fMRI activation maps based on the NN-ARx model

The most significant progresses in the understanding of human brain functions have been possible due to the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which when used in combination with other standard neuroimaging techniques (i.e., EEG) provides researchers with a potential tool to elucidate many biophysical principles, established previously by animal comparative studies. However, to date, most of the methods proposed in the literature seeking fMRI signs have been limited to the use of a top-down data analysis approach, thus ignoring a pool of physiological facts. In spite of the important contributions achieved by applying these methods to actual data, there is a disproportionate gap between theoretical models and data-analysis strategies while trying to focus on several new prospects, like for example fMRI/EEG data fusion, causality/connectivity patterns, and nonlinear BOLD signal dynamics. In this paper, we propose a new approach which will allow many of the abovementioned hot topics to be addressed in the near future with an underlying interpretability based on bottom-up modeling. In particular, the theta-MAP presented in the paper to test brain activation corresponds very well with the standardized t test of the SPM99 toolbox. Additionally, a new Impulse Response Function (IRF) has been formulated, directly related to the well-established concept of the hemodynamics response function (HRF). The model uses not only the information contained in the signal but also that in the structure of the background noise to simultaneously estimate the IRF and the autocorrelation function (ACF) by using an autoregressive (AR) model with a filtered Poisson process driving the dynamics. The short-range contributions of voxels within the near-neighborhood are also included, and the potential drift was characterized by a polynomial series. Since our model originated from an immediate extension of the hemodynamics approach [Friston, K.J., Mechelli, A., Turner, R., Price C.J. (2000a). Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the balloon model, volterra kernels, and other hemodynamics. NeuroImage 12, 466-477.], a natural interpretability of the results is feasible.

[1]  T. Ozaki,et al.  Modelling nonlinear random vibrations using an amplitude-dependent autoregressive time series model , 1981 .

[2]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Regional Differences in the Refractory Period of the Hemodynamic Response: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[3]  Xianhong Xie,et al.  Optimal spline smoothing of fMRI time series by generalized cross-validation , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  B. Rosen,et al.  Evidence of a Cerebrovascular Postarteriole Windkessel with Delayed Compliance , 1999, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing the Response of PET and fMRI Data Using Multivariate Linear Models , 1997, NeuroImage.

[7]  Tohru Ozaki,et al.  Recursive penalized least squares solution for dynamical inverse problems of EEG generation , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  Regional distribution of human cerebral vascular mean transit time measured by positron emission tomography , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear event‐related responses in fMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  To Smooth or Not to Smooth? Bias and Efficiency in fMRI Time-Series Analysis , 2000, NeuroImage.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Study of Analysis Parameters That Influence the Sensitivity of Event-Related fMRI Analyses , 2000, NeuroImage.

[14]  P. J. Jennings,et al.  Time series analysis in the time domain and resampling methods for studies of functional magnetic resonance brain imaging , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multivariate Autoregressive Modelling of fMRI time series , 2003 .

[16]  G. Berns,et al.  Continuous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Dynamic Nonlinearities of “Dose-Response” Curves for Finger Opposition , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  Yasumasa Matsuda,et al.  A Spatio-temporal Regression Model for the Analysis of Functional MRI Data , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  On Bias in the Estimation of Autocorrelations for fMRI Voxel Time-Series Analysis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  O Josephs,et al.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  C. Iadecola,et al.  Intrinsic signals and functional brain mapping: caution, blood vessels at work. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Posterior probability maps and SPMs , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Martin Petri,et al.  To Smooth or Not to Smooth - the Impact of Grants and Remittances on the Equilibrium Real Exchange Rate in Jordan , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  J. Rajapakse,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:283–300(1998) � Modeling Hemodynamic Response for Analysis of Functional MRI Time-Series , 2022 .

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  P. Magistretti,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of brain energy metabolism and their relevance to functional brain imaging. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response in fMRI using smooth FIR filters , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event-related fMRI , 1997 .

[32]  J. C. Jimenez,et al.  Local linearization filters for non-linear continuous-discrete state space models with multiplicative noise , 2003 .

[33]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of the Nonlinear Dynamics in the FMRI BOLD Response , 2001, NeuroImage.

[34]  A M Dale,et al.  Estimation and detection of event‐related fMRI signals with temporally correlated noise: A statistically efficient and unbiased approach , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[35]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Scott L. Zeger,et al.  Non‐linear Fourier Time Series Analysis for Human Brain Mapping by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997 .

[37]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Introduction to time series and forecasting , 1998 .

[38]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Locally Regularized Spatiotemporal Modeling and Model Comparison for Functional MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[39]  N. Harel,et al.  Blood capillary distribution correlates with hemodynamic-based functional imaging in cerebral cortex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[41]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Evidence for a Refractory Period in the Hemodynamic Response to Visual Stimuli as Measured by MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[42]  H. Benali,et al.  Robust Bayesian estimation of the hemodynamic response function in event‐related BOLD fMRI using basic physiological information , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[43]  F Kruggel,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response in single‐trial functional MRI experiments , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[44]  Silke Dodel,et al.  Functional connectivity: studying nonlinear, delayed interactions between BOLD signals , 2003, NeuroImage.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Dynamical Systems: An Application to fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[46]  Naoki Miura,et al.  A state-space model of the hemodynamic approach: nonlinear filtering of BOLD signals , 2004, NeuroImage.