How Do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas?: A New Approach to the Analysis of Criminal Location Choice

This paper introduces the discrete spatial choice approach to the study of criminal target choice. The approach is used to assess whether residential burglars are attracted to target areas that are affluent, accessible, and poorly guarded. In addition, the importance of these criteria is postulated to vary across burglars. The theory is tested using data on 548 residential burglaries, committed by 290 burglars from the city of The Hague, the Netherlands. The likelihood of a neighbourhood's being selected for burglary is heightened by its ethnic heterogeneity, its percentage of single-family dwellings, and its proximity to where the offender lives. The results and prospects of the discrete spatial choice approach for spatial target selection research are discussed.

[1]  H. D. McKay,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas , 1943 .

[2]  J. Marschak Binary Choice Constraints on Random Utility Indicators , 1959 .

[3]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[4]  S L Boggs,et al.  Urban crime patterns. , 1965, American sociological review.

[5]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[6]  T. S. Smith,et al.  Inverse Distance Variations for the Flow of Crime in Urban Areas , 1976 .

[7]  Monica A. Walker,et al.  The urban criminal: A study in Sheffield , 1976 .

[8]  A. Agresti,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Qualitative Variation , 1978 .

[9]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[10]  H. White Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models , 1982 .

[11]  Mike Maguire,et al.  Recent Book: Burglary in a Dwelling — The Offence, the Offender and the Victim , 1983 .

[12]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Territoriality and residential crime: a conceptual framework. , 1982 .

[13]  Thomas Gabor,et al.  Offender Characteristics and Spatial Mobility: An Empirical Study and Some Policy Implications , 1984 .

[14]  Patricia L. Brantingham,et al.  Burglar Mobility and Crime Prevention Planning , 1984 .

[15]  Trevor Bennett,et al.  Burglars on Burglary: Prevention and the Offender , 1984 .

[16]  D. McFadden,et al.  Specification tests for the multinomial logit model , 1984 .

[17]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization , 1987 .

[18]  C. Nee,et al.  THE ROLE OF CUES IN SIMULATED RESIDENTIAL BURGLARYA Preliminary Investigation , 1988 .

[19]  R. Sampson,et al.  Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  G. Jarjoura,et al.  Household Characteristics, Neighborhood Composition and Victimization Risk , 1989 .

[21]  Paul F. Cromwell,et al.  Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary , 1990 .

[22]  Rene B. P. Hesseling Using data on offender mobility in ecological research , 1992 .

[23]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Contextual Effects in Models of Criminal Victimization , 1993 .

[24]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  MACRO‐MICRO INTEGRATION IN THE STUDY OF VICTIMIZATION: A HIERARCHICAL LOGISTIC MODEL ANALYSIS ACROSS SEATTLE NEIGHBORHOODS* , 1994 .

[25]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[26]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Burglars On The Job: Streetlife and Residential Break-ins , 1994 .

[27]  G. Farrell,et al.  LIKE TAKING CANDY Why does Repeat Victimization Occur , 1995 .

[28]  Strategische misdaadanalyse en stedelijke criminaliteit. Een toepassing van de rationele keuzebenadering op stedelijke criminaliteitspatronen en het gedrag van daders, toegespitst op het delict woninginbraak , 1996 .

[29]  K. Bowers,et al.  NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF REPEAT VICTIMIZATION , 1997 .

[30]  Kate Bowers,et al.  Exploring links between crime and disadvantage in north-west England: an analysis using geographical information systems , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Max Taylor,et al.  Examining burglars' target selection: Interview, experiment or ethnomethodology? , 2000 .

[32]  David V. Canter,et al.  Predicting Serial Killers' Home Base Using a Decision Support System , 2000 .

[33]  Janet Chaseling,et al.  Repeat Burglary Victimisation: Spatial and Temporal Patterns , 2000 .

[34]  K. Land,et al.  The Generalizability of Multilevel Models of Burglary Victimization: A Cross-City Comparison , 2000 .

[35]  George F. Rengert,et al.  Target search of burglars: A revised economic model , 2001 .

[36]  María B. Vélez THE ROLE OF PUBLIC SOCIAL CONTROL IN URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS: A MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS OF VICTIMIZATION RISK* , 2001 .

[37]  Wim Bernasco,et al.  EFFECTS OF ATTRACTIVENESS, OPPORTUNITY AND ACCESSIBILITY TO BURGLARS ON RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY RATES OF URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS , 2003 .

[38]  Suburb boundaries and residential burglars , 2003 .

[39]  M. Townsley,et al.  Infectious Burglaries. A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis , 2003 .

[40]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  The Stability of Space-Time Clusters of Burglary , 2004 .

[41]  T. Clackson,et al.  Breaking and entering , 2006, Nature chemical biology.