A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection

Article history: Received 1 April 2011 Received in revised form May, 08, 2011 Accepted 08 May 2011 Available online 10 May 2011 Industrial robots are mainly employed to perform repetitive and hazardous production jobs, multi-shift operations etc. to reduce the delivery time, improve the work environment, lower the production cost and even increase the product range to fulfill the customers’ needs. When a choice is to be made from among several alternative robots for a given industrial application, it is necessary to compare their performance characteristics in a decisive way. As the industrial robot selection problem involves multiple conflicting criteria and a finite set of candidate alternatives, different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods can be effectively used to solve such type of problem. In this paper, ten most popular MCDM methods are considered and their relative performance are compared with respect to the rankings of the alternative robots as engaged in some industrial pick-n-place operation. It is observed that all these methods give almost the same rankings of the alternative robots, although the performance of WPM, TOPSIS and GRA methods are slightly better than the others. It can be concluded that for a given industrial robot selection problem, more attention is to be paid on the proper selection of the relevant criteria and alternatives, not on choosing the most appropriate MCDM method to be employed. © 2011 Growing Science Ltd. All rights reserved

[1]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting , 2009, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[2]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  A hybrid multiple attribute decision making method for solving problems of industrial environment , 2011 .

[3]  M. J. Khouja.  AN OPTIONS VIEW OF ROBOT PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS IN A DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT , 1999 .

[4]  Mitsuo Gen,et al.  Genetic algorithm for robot selection and work station assignment problem , 1996 .

[5]  Y. A. Tung,et al.  A revised weighted sum decision model for robot selection , 1996 .

[6]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[8]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Decision making in the manufacturing environment using an improved PROMETHEE method , 2010 .

[9]  Subir Kumar Saha,et al.  Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot , 2004 .

[10]  Chon-Huat Goh,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process for robot selection , 1997 .

[11]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods , 2010 .

[12]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Evaluating and selecting investments in industrial robots , 1999 .

[13]  S. K. Mukherjee,et al.  Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective , 2005 .

[14]  David J. Sheskin,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 1997 .

[15]  T. Chu,et al.  A Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Robot Selection , 2003 .

[16]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Robot selection using an integrated approach based on quality function deployment and fuzzy regression , 2008 .

[17]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Multicriteria analysis: survey and new tendencies , 1981 .

[18]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) , 2004 .

[19]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences , 2011, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  V. P. Agrawal,et al.  Computer aided robot selection: the ‘multiple attribute decision making’ approach , 1991 .

[22]  P. Vincke,et al.  Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions , 1981 .

[23]  Adel Guitouni,et al.  Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Arpan Kumar Kar,et al.  A satisfaction function and distance measure based multi-criteria robot selection procedure , 2011 .

[25]  Dimitris E. Koulouriotis,et al.  A fuzzy digraph method for robot evaluation and selection , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[27]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Andrew J. Higgins,et al.  A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju,et al.  Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Rishi Kumar,et al.  Optimal selection of robots by using distance based approach method , 2010 .

[31]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Stelios H. Zanakis,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Celik Parkan,et al.  Decision-making and performance measurement models with applications to robot selection , 1999 .

[34]  E. E. Karsak *,et al.  Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection , 2005 .

[35]  Ram Rachamadugu,et al.  A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1997 .

[36]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Dimensional analysis for investment selection in industrial robots , 2000 .

[37]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods , 2006 .

[38]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification , 2000 .

[39]  V. Tummala,et al.  A comparative study of multiattribute decision making methodologies , 1990 .