Morphometry of human superficial dorsal and dorsolateral column fibres: significance to spinal cord stimulation.

In spinal cord stimulation (SCS) large diameter cutaneous (Abeta) fibres in the dorsal columns (DCs) are activated and have an inhibiting effect on the transmission of pain signals by Adelta and C fibres from the corresponding dermatome(s). The largest Abeta fibres can be activated up to a maximum depth of about 0.25 mm in the DCs. No data are available on the distribution of the large fibres in this superficial human DC layer at the common SCS levels Th(10-11). Such data are indispensable to improve the predictive capability of a computer model of SCS. The whole myelinated fibre population in the superficial 300 microm of the dorsal column (DC(0-300)) at Th(10-11 )of two human subjects was morphometrically analysed. Some data was obtained from a third subject. The superficial dorsolateral column (DLC(0-300)) was included in this analysis because it was hypothesized that large dorsal spinocerebellar tract fibres could also be activated by SCS. Only very few fibres larger than 10.7 microm were found: a mean of 68 (0.5%) in DC(0-300) and 114 (2%) in DLC(0-300). Considering that the effect of SCS is primarily attributed to activation of these largest fibres, it is concluded that a surprisingly small average amount of 2.4 fibres per running 0.1 mm width and 6 fibres per segmental division of the DC is involved. Distinct mediolateral heterogeneity in fibre composition was found in both DC(0-300) and DLC(0-300). In the DC(0-300), the mean diameter of fibres > or =7.1 microm increases significantly by 5% from medial to lateral. Density (i.e. number of fibres per 1000 microm(2)) and frequency (i.e. percentage of a fibre size group compared to its parent population) of the large fibres increase significantly from medial to lateral in the DC(0-300). For fibres > or =10.7 microm, these parameters increase by 200 and 269%, respectively. It is concluded that the difference in stimulation threshold of large Abeta fibres in the median and lateral DC can be mainly attributed to the absence and presence, respectively, of collaterals at the stimulation site. Marked differences were found between DC(0-300) and DLC(0-300). The largest DLC(0-300) fibres (> or =10.7 microm) have a 320% higher frequency and a 473% higher density. Their mean diameter is, however, only 2% larger. The largest DLC(0-300) fibres are not likely to be recruited by SCS, since they are not larger than their DC(0-300) counterparts, they lack collaterals (which would reduce the threshold stimulus substantially) and they are more remote from the stimulation electrode.

[1]  Jan Holsheimer,et al.  Which Neuronal Elements are Activated Directly by Spinal Cord Stimulation , 2002, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[2]  Y. Imai,et al.  Distribution of the dorsal root fibers in the cat. An experimental study with the Nauta method. , 1969, Brain research.

[3]  H. Feirabend,et al.  Preservation and staining of myelinated nerve fibers. , 1998, Methods.

[4]  N. Smirnov Table for Estimating the Goodness of Fit of Empirical Distributions , 1948 .

[5]  J. Szentágothai-Schimert Die Bedeutung des Faserkalibers und der Markscheidendicke im Zentralnervensystem , 2004, Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte.

[6]  K. Horch,et al.  Ascending collaterals of cutaneous neurons in the fasciculus gracilis of the cat , 1976, Brain Research.

[7]  M C Smith,et al.  Topographical anatomy of the posterior columns of the spinal cord in man. The long ascending fibres. , 1984, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Estimation of fiber diameters in the spinal dorsal columns from clinical data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Jan Holsheimer,et al.  Computer modelling of spinal cord stimulation and its contribution to therapeutic efficacy , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[10]  Y. Hashizume,et al.  Morphometric Study of Myelinated Fibers in Human Cervical Spinal Cord White Matter , 1996, Spine.

[11]  J. Struijk,et al.  Contact Combinations in Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation , 1991 .

[12]  R. North,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. , 1995, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[13]  J. Voogd,et al.  White matter of the cerebellum of the chicken (Gallus domesticus): A quantitative light and electron microscopic analysis of myelinated fibers and fiber compartments , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  J. Holsheimer,et al.  Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Preservation of myelinated fibers for electron microscopy: a qualitative comparison of aldehyde fixation, microwave stabilisation and other procedures all completed by osmication , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Patrick D. Wall,et al.  Pain mechanisms: A new theory , 1996 .

[17]  Simpson Ba Spinal cord stimulation. , 1997 .

[18]  A. Kolmogoroff Confidence Limits for an Unknown Distribution Function , 1941 .

[19]  G. Barolat Current Status of Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation , 1995 .

[20]  A. G. Brown,et al.  Organization of the spinal cord , 1964 .

[21]  Akio Ohnishi,et al.  Morphometry of myelinated fibers of fasciculus gracilis of man , 1976, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[22]  P. Wall,et al.  The physiology and anatomy of long ranging afferent fibres within the spinal cord. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  R A Davidoff,et al.  The dorsal columns , 1989, Neurology.