Propagation of a stress wave through a virtual functionally graded foam

Abstract Stress wave propagation through a Functionally Graded Foam Material (FGFM) is analysed in this paper using the finite element method. A finite element model of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) is developed to apply realistic boundary conditions to a uniform density foam and is validated against laboratory SHPB tests. Wave propagation through virtual FGFMs with various gradient functions is then considered. The amplitude of the stress wave is found to be shaped by the gradient functions, i.e., the stress can be amplified or diminished following propagation through the FGFMs. The plastic dissipation energy in the specimens is also shaped by the gradient functions. This property of FGFMs provides significant potential for such materials to be used for cushioning structures.

[1]  S. Stock,et al.  Uniform and graded chemical milling of aluminum foams , 2007 .

[2]  K O'Riordain,et al.  Reconstruction of real world head injury accidents resulting from falls using multibody dynamics. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  O. Lee,et al.  Dynamic material property characterization by using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) technique , 2003 .

[4]  Gérard Gary,et al.  A three dimensional analytical solution of the longitudinal wave propagation in an infinite linear viscoelastic cylindrical bar. Application to experimental techniques , 1995 .

[5]  J. Lankford,et al.  Strain Rate Effects in Porous Materials , 1998 .

[6]  M. D. Gilchrist,et al.  Simulation of the development of frontal head impact injury , 2000 .

[7]  N. Fleck,et al.  High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams , 2000 .

[8]  David C. Dunand,et al.  Mechanical properties of a density-graded replicated aluminum foam , 2008 .

[9]  T. J. Horgan,et al.  Influence of FE model variability in predicting brain motion and intracranial pressure changes in head impact simulations , 2004 .

[10]  William G. Proud,et al.  Determination of physicomechanical properties of soft soils from medium to high strain rates , 2008 .

[11]  Han Zhao,et al.  On the strength enhancement under impact loading of square tubes made from rate insensitive metals , 2004 .

[12]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood , 1997 .

[13]  Fangyun Lu,et al.  High-strain-rate compressive behavior of a rigid polyurethane foam with various densities , 2002 .

[14]  Mamoru Mabuchi,et al.  Dynamic compression of an ultra-low density aluminium foam , 2000 .

[15]  Giuseppe Sala,et al.  Deformation mechanisms and energy absorption of polystyrene foams for protective helmets , 2002 .

[16]  Gérard A. Maugin,et al.  Numerical simulation of two-dimensional wave propagation in functionally graded materials , 2003 .

[17]  N. S. Brar,et al.  Dynamic characterization of compliant materials using an all-polymeric split Hopkinson bar , 1998 .

[18]  M. Avalle,et al.  High strain-rate compression test on metallic foam using a multiple pulse SHPB Apparatus , 2006 .

[19]  F. Hild,et al.  Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: Part I Experiments , 2007 .

[20]  Hugh A. Bruck,et al.  A one-dimensional model for designing functionally graded materials to manage stress waves , 2000 .

[21]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Mechanical characterization of soft materials using high speed photography and split hopkinson pressure bar technique , 2002 .

[22]  M. J. Forrestal,et al.  Dynamic Compression Testing of Soft Materials , 2002 .

[23]  A. Evans,et al.  Porous and cellular materials for structural applications , 1998 .

[24]  B. Kieback,et al.  Processing techniques for functionally graded materials , 2003 .

[25]  F. H. Harlow,et al.  A stochastic constitutive model for disordered cellular materials: Finite-strain uni-axial compression , 2006 .

[26]  Michael D. Gilchrist,et al.  Designing the energy absorption capacity of functionally graded foam materials , 2009 .

[27]  Han Zhao,et al.  On the use of SHPB techniques to determine the dynamic behavior of materials in the range of small strains , 1996 .

[28]  James Lankford,et al.  High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminium foams , 2000 .

[29]  M. J. Forrestal,et al.  Dynamic small strain measurements of a metal specimen with a split Hopkinson pressure bar , 2003 .

[30]  Jia-Lin Tsai,et al.  Use of split Hopkinson pressure bar for testing off-axis composites , 2001 .

[31]  T. J. Horgan,et al.  A two-dimensional analysis of the biomechanics of frontal and occipital head impact injuries , 2001 .

[32]  W. Stronge.  DYNAMIC CRUSHING OF ELASTOPLASTIC CELLULAR SOLIDS , 1992 .

[33]  M. M. Al-Mousawi,et al.  The use of the split Hopkinson pressure bar techniques in high strain rate materials testing , 1997 .

[34]  N. Hilyard,et al.  Observations on the Impact Behaviour of Polyurethane Foams; I. The Polymer Matrix , 1971 .

[35]  A Gilchrist,et al.  The effectiveness of foams in bicycle and motorcycle helmets. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  R. H. Blanc.  Transient Wave Propagation Methods for Determining the Viscoelastic Properties of Solids , 1993 .