Molecular biomimetics: utilizing nature's molecular ways in practical engineering.

In nature, proteins are the machinery that accomplish many functions through their specific recognition and interactions in biological systems from single-celled to multicellular organisms. Biomolecule-material interaction is accomplished via molecular specificity, leading to the formation of controlled structures and functions at all scales of dimensional hierarchy. Through evolution, molecular recognition and, consequently, functions developed through successive cycles of mutation and selection. Using biology as a guide, we can now understand, engineer and control peptide-material interactions and exploit these to tailor novel materials and systems for practical applications. We adapted combinatorial biology protocols to display peptide libraries, either on the cell surface or on phages, to select short peptides specific to a variety of practical materials systems. Following the selection step, we determined the kinetics and stability of peptide binding experimentally to understand the bound peptide structure via modeling and its assembly via atomic force microscopy. The peptides were further engineered to have multiple repeats or their amino acid sequences varied to tailor their function. Both nanoparticles and flat inorganic substrates containing multimaterials patterned at the nano- and microscales were used for self-directed immobilization of molecular constructs. The molecular biomimetic approach opens up new avenues for the design and utilization of multifunctional molecular systems with wide ranging applications, from tissue engineering, drug delivery and biosensors, to nanotechnology and bioremediation. Here we give examples of protein-mediated functional materials in biology, peptide selection and engineering with affinity to inorganics, demonstrate potential utilizations in materials science, engineering and medicine, and describe future prospects.

[1]  B. Kay,et al.  Filamentous phage display in the new millennium. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[2]  G. Weiss,et al.  Optimizing the affinity and specificity of proteins with molecular display. , 2006, Molecular bioSystems.

[3]  D. Bartel,et al.  Synthesizing life , 2001, Nature.

[4]  Hideaki Nakamura,et al.  Current research activity in biosensors , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[5]  Ersin Emre Oren,et al.  Adsorption kinetics of an engineered gold binding Peptide by surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and a quartz crystal microbalance. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  D. Ryu,et al.  Recent Progress in Biomolecular Engineering , 2000, Biotechnology progress.

[7]  Marina Cretich,et al.  Protein and peptide arrays: recent trends and new directions. , 2006, Biomolecular engineering.

[8]  B. Rehm Microbial bionanotechnology : biological self-assembly systems and biopolymer-based nanostructures , 2006 .

[9]  Mehmet Sarikaya,et al.  Rigid biological composite materials: Structural examples for biomimetic design , 2002 .

[10]  N. Seeman,et al.  Emulating biology: Building nanostructures from the bottom up , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Joachim,et al.  Nanoscale science of single molecules using local probes , 1999, Science.

[12]  S. Bader Colloquium: Opportunities in Nanomagnetism , 2006 .

[13]  Rajesh R Naik,et al.  Silica-precipitating peptides isolated from a combinatorial phage display peptide library. , 2002, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[14]  Mehmet Sarikaya,et al.  Identification and characterization of Cu2O‐ and ZnO‐binding polypeptides by Escherichia coli cell surface display: toward an understanding of metal oxide binding , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Johannes A A W Elemans,et al.  Self-assembled nanoreactors. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[16]  Philip Ball,et al.  Synthetic biology for nanotechnology , 2004 .

[17]  Candan Tamerler,et al.  Genetically engineered polypeptides for inorganics: A utility in biological materials science and engineering , 2007 .

[18]  M. Sarikaya,et al.  A genetic analysis of crystal growth. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  N. Kröger,et al.  Polycationic peptides from diatom biosilica that direct silica nanosphere formation. , 1999, Science.

[20]  M. Schembri,et al.  Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by fimbrial designer adhesins. , 1999, FEMS microbiology letters.

[21]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Bionanotechnology: Lessons from Nature , 2004 .

[22]  Ersin Emre Oren,et al.  Metal recognition of septapeptides via polypod molecular architecture. , 2005, Nano letters.

[23]  M. Mann,et al.  Proteomics to study genes and genomes , 2000, Nature.

[24]  S. Weiner,et al.  Design strategies in mineralized biological materials , 1997 .

[25]  D. Endy Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[26]  Stanley Brown,et al.  Metal-recognition by repeating polypeptides , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  M. N. Gupta,et al.  The affinity concept in bioseparation: evolving paradigms and expanding range of applications. , 2006, Biomolecular engineering.

[28]  K. Schulten,et al.  Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology , 2003, Nature materials.

[29]  F. Baneyx,et al.  MATERIALS ASSEMBLY AND FORMATION USING ENGINEERED POLYPEPTIDES , 2004 .

[30]  F. Buot,et al.  Mesoscopic physics and nanoelectronics: nanoscience and nanotechnology , 1993 .

[31]  M. Sarikaya Biomimetics: materials fabrication through biology. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Paul F. Barbara,et al.  Selection of peptides with semiconductor binding specificity for directed nanocrystal assembly , 2000, Nature.

[33]  Satchidananda Panda,et al.  An array of insights: application of DNA chip technology in the study of cell biology. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[34]  E. Gaino,et al.  Biomimetic model of a sponge-spicular optical fiber—mechanical properties and structure , 2001 .

[35]  G. Stucky,et al.  Silicatein alpha: cathepsin L-like protein in sponge biosilica. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Clément Sanchez,et al.  Biomimetism and bioinspiration as tools for the design of innovative materials and systems , 2005, Nature materials.

[37]  John R. Miller,et al.  Charge Transfer on the Nanoscale: Current Status , 2003 .

[38]  Philip Ball,et al.  Life's lessons in design , 2001, Nature.

[39]  C. Rodríguez-Abreu,et al.  Self-assembly: a minimalist route to the fabrication of nanomaterials. , 2006, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[40]  C. Niemeyer REVIEW Nanoparticles, Proteins, and Nucleic Acids: Biotechnology Meets Materials Science , 2022 .

[41]  K. Katti,et al.  3D finite element modeling of mechanical response in nacre-based hybrid nanocomposites , 2001 .

[42]  Mehmet Sarikaya,et al.  Enamel Structure Properties Controlled by Engineered Proteins in Transgenic Mice , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[43]  D. Bartel,et al.  Synthesizing life : Paths to unforeseeable science & technology , 2001 .

[44]  B. Power,et al.  A new generation of protein display scaffolds for molecular recognition , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[45]  Kiyotaka Shiba,et al.  Specificity and biomineralization activities of Ti-binding peptide-1 (TBP-1). , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.