Intelligibility in speech maskers with a binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex

ABSTRACT We have recently proposed a binaural cochlear implant (CI) sound processing strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex (the MOC strategy) and shown that it improves intelligibility in steady‐state noise (Lopez‐Poveda et al., 2016, Ear Hear 37:e138‐e148). The aim here was to evaluate possible speech‐reception benefits of the MOC strategy for speech maskers, a more natural type of interferer. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in six bilateral and two single‐sided deaf CI users with the MOC strategy and with a standard (STD) strategy. SRTs were measured in unilateral and bilateral listening conditions, and for target and masker stimuli located at azimuthal angles of (0°, 0°), (−15°, +15°), and (−90°, +90°). Mean SRTs were 2–5 dB better with the MOC than with the STD strategy for spatially separated target and masker sources. For bilateral CI users, the MOC strategy (1) facilitated the intelligibility of speech in competition with spatially separated speech maskers in both unilateral and bilateral listening conditions; and (2) led to an overall improvement in spatial release from masking in the two listening conditions. Insofar as speech is a more natural type of interferer than steady‐state noise, the present results suggest that the MOC strategy holds potential for promising outcomes for CI users. HIGHLIGHTSBenefits of a novel binaural cochlear implant sound‐coding strategy are reported.The strategy improves intelligibility and spatial masking release in speech interferers.For single‐sided deaf implant users, benefits occur in unilateral listening.For bilateral implant users, benefits occur in unilateral and bilateral listening.The strategy holds potential for promising outcomes for implant users.

[1]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Alicia Huarte,et al.  The Castilian Spanish Hearing in Noise Test , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[4]  J. Guinan Olivocochlear Efferents: Anatomy, Physiology, Function, and the Measurement of Efferent Effects in Humans , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[5]  IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics.

[6]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Vincent Aubanel,et al.  The Sharvard Corpus: A phonemically-balanced Spanish sentence resource for audiology , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[8]  Paul J Boyd,et al.  Effects of Programming Threshold and Maplaw Settings on Acoustic Thresholds and Speech Discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ Cochlear Implant , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[9]  John J Guinan,et al.  Cochlear efferent innervation and function , 2010, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[10]  Enrique A. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2016, Trends in hearing.

[11]  W. G. Gardner,et al.  HRTF measurements of a KEMAR , 1995 .

[12]  Yi Hu,et al.  Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Roles of the Contralateral Efferent Reflex in Hearing Demonstrated with Cochlear Implants. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[14]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Two New Directions in Speech Processor Design for Cochlear Implants , 2005, Ear and hearing.