Sperm Swimming Velocity Predicts Competitive Fertilization Success in the Green Swordtail Xiphophorus helleri

Sperm competition is expected to favour the evolution of traits that influence the performance of sperm when they compete to fertilize a female's eggs. While there is considerable evidence that selection favours increases in sperm numbers, much less is known about how sperm quality contributes towards competitive fertilization success. Here, we determine whether variation in sperm quality influences competitive fertilization success in the green swordtail Xiphophorus helleri, a highly promiscuous livebearing fish. We use artificial insemination as a method of controlled sperm delivery and show that sperm swimming velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success when ejaculates from two males compete to fertilize a female's eggs. By contrast, we found no evidence that sperm length had any effect on siring success. We also found no evidence that pre- and postcopulatory sexual traits were phenotypically integrated in this species, suggesting that the previous observation that reproductive skew favours males with high mating rates is unlikely to be due to any direct association between sperm quality and male sexual ornamentation.

[1]  I. Ramnarine,et al.  Geographic variation in sperm traits reflects predation risk and natural rates of multiple paternity in the guppy , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[2]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Do female association preferences predict the likelihood of reproduction? , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  R. J. Robertson,et al.  Comparative Evidence for the Evolution of Sperm Swimming Speed by Sperm Competition and Female Sperm Storage Duration in Passerine Birds , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid fishes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  L. Simmons,et al.  Molecular evidence for multiple paternity in a feral population of green swordtails. , 2008, The Journal of heredity.

[6]  J. Avise,et al.  Pronounced reproductive skew in a natural population of green swordtails, Xiphophorus helleri , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[7]  D. Hosken,et al.  Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition , 2008, Current Biology.

[8]  I. Folstad,et al.  Factors predicting male fertilization success in an external fertilizer , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  J. Evans,et al.  Postcopulatory sexual selection favours intrinsically good sperm competitors , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  L. Simmons,et al.  SHORTER SPERM CONFER HIGHER COMPETITIVE FERTILIZATION SUCCESS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[12]  R. Ingermann,et al.  Development of a novel CASA system based on open source software for characterization of zebrafish sperm motility parameters. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[13]  D. Emlen,et al.  Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[15]  A. Basolo,et al.  Male–male competition and the sword in male swordtails, Xiphophorus helleri , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  A. Dixson,et al.  Sperm competition and the evolution of sperm midpiece volume in mammals , 2005 .

[17]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Paternity in mallards: Effects of sperm quality and female sperm selection for inbreeding avoidance , 2005 .

[18]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual conflict , 2005, Current Biology.

[19]  G. Yue,et al.  Novel microsatellites from the green swordtail (Xiphophorus hellerii) also display polymorphism in guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2004 .

[20]  J. Evans,et al.  CRYPTIC FEMALE PREFERENCE FOR COLORFUL MALES IN GUPPIES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  G. Parker,et al.  Spermatozoal Traits and Sperm Competition in Atlantic Salmon Relative Sperm Velocity Is the Primary Determinant of Fertilization Success , 2004, Current Biology.

[22]  L. Simmons,et al.  Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  J. Evans,et al.  Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination , 2003, Nature.

[24]  L. Simmons,et al.  EVOLUTION OF EJACULATES: PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC AND GENOTYPIC VARIATION AND CONDITION DEPENDENCE IN SPERM COMPETITION TRAITS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Evolution of sex: Postcopulatory sexual selection , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[26]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Sperm Viability and Sperm Competition in Insects , 2002, Current Biology.

[27]  A. Meyer,et al.  Microsatellites in the genus Xiphophorus, developed in Xiphophorus montezumae , 2001 .

[28]  A. Magurran,et al.  Patterns of sperm precedence and predictors of paternity in the Trinidadian guppy , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion , 2001, Nature.

[30]  I. Danielsson Antagonistic pre– and post–copulatory sexual selection on male body size in a water strider (Gerris lacustris) , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  M. Edvardsson,et al.  Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  T. Burke,et al.  Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  P. Stockley Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection , 1999, Heredity.

[34]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Female preference for swords in Xiphophorus helleri reflects a bias for large apparent size. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  A. Magurran,et al.  Male display rate reveals ejaculate characteristics in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  W. L. Miller,et al.  Female preference for dynamic traits in the green swordtail,Xiphophorus helleri , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  M. Gomendio,et al.  Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  A. Basolo,et al.  Female preference for male sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae) , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  Claude Gagnon Controls of Sperm Motility: Biological and Clinical Aspects , 1990 .

[40]  R. Thornhill Cryptic Female Choice and Its Implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[41]  E. Clark A method for artificial insemination in viviparous fishes. , 1950, Science.

[42]  J. Evans,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Poeciliid Fishes , 2011 .

[43]  M. Gomendio,et al.  Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility. , 2008, The International journal of developmental biology.

[44]  R. Snook Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  T. Vladić,et al.  Sperm Quality as Reflected Through Morphology in Salmon Alternative Life Histories1 , 2002, Biology of reproduction.

[46]  W. Eberhard Female control : sexual selection by cryptic female choice , 1996 .

[47]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS , 1970 .