[To fix the unstable region of sagittal injured unit symmetrically with pedicle screws combined with bone graft fusion for treating thoracolumbar fractures].

Objective To discuss the security and effectiveness of fixing the unstable region of sagittal injured unit symmetrically with pedicle screws combined with bone graft fusion for treating thoracolumbar fractures. Methods A series of 65 patients with a single level thoracolumbar fracture between November 2011 and November 2015 were included in the study. There were 41 males and 24 females with an average age of 36.7 years (range, 23-60 years). The fracture segments included T 7 1 case, T 9 in 2 cases, T 10 in 4 cases, T 11 in 8 cases, T 12 in 14 cases, L 1 in 19 cases, L 2 in 13 cases, L 3 in 3 cases, and L 4 in 1 case. According to AO classification, there were 34 cases classified as type A, 27 cases type B, and 4 cases type C. The neurological function was evaluated by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade score, there were 1 case at grade A, 2 cases grade B, 6 cases grade C, 15 cases grade D, and 41 cases grade E. The thoracolumbar injury severity score (TLICS) was 4 in 9 cases, 5 in 29 cases, 6-8 in 23 cases, 9-10 in 4 cases. The time form injury to operation was 2-12 days (mean, 5.3 days). The fractured vertebra, along with the superior and inferior discs were defined as a injured unit and divided into three parts on the sagittal position: region Ⅰ mainly including the superior disc, cephalic 1/3 of injured vertebra, and posterior ligamentous complex as to oppose; region Ⅱ mainly including the middle 1/3 of injured vertebra, pedicles, lamina, spinous process, and supraspinal ligament; region Ⅲ mainly including the inferior disc, caudal 1/3 of injured vertebra, and posterior ligamentous complex as to oppose. The unstable region was defined as the key injured region of the vertebra. Pedicle screws were fixed symmetrically and correspondingly with bone grafting to treat thoracolumbar fractures. The neurological status, ratio of anterior body height, and sagittal Cobb angle were collected at preoperation, immediate after operation, and last follow-up to evaluate surgical and clinical outcomes. Results All patients accepted operation safely and were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17.3 months). Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 3 patients, and cured by symptomatic treatment. There was no complications such as loosening, displacement, and breakage of internal fixator. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients at 10-13 months (mean, 11.4 months) after operation. At last follow-up, according to ASIA grading, 1 case was grade A, 1 grade B, 3 grade C, 9 grade D, and 51 grade E, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative data ( Z=-2.963, P=0.014). The ratio of anterior body height at preoperation, immediate after operation, and last follow-up were 53.2%±6.8%, 91.3%±8.3%, 89.5%±6.6% respectively; and the sagittal Cobb angle were (16.3±8.1), (2.6±7.5), (3.2±6.8)° respectively. The ratio of anterior body height and the sagittal Cobb angle at immediate after operation and at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between at immediate after operation and at last follow-up ( P>0.05). Conclusion It is safe and reliable to treat thoracolumbar fractures under the principle of fixing the unstable region of injured unit symmetrically with pedicle screws combined with bone grafting.

[1]  Alpesh A. Patel,et al.  Evaluation of the safety and reliability of the newly-proposed AO spine injury classification system , 2017, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[2]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  The radiologic assessment of posterior ligamentous complex injury in patients with thoracolumbar fracture , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[3]  L. Felli,et al.  Which patients risk segmental kyphosis after short segment thoracolumbar fracture fixation with intermediate screws? , 2016, Injury.

[4]  Sub-Ri Park,et al.  More than 5-Year Follow-up Results of Two-Level and Three-Level Posterior Fixations of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures with Load-Sharing Scores of Seven and Eight Points , 2016, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[5]  Alpesh A. Patel,et al.  Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Injury Severity Score System: A Literature Review of Its Safety , 2015, Global spine journal.

[6]  J. Vlamis,et al.  Evaluation of TLICS for thoracolumbar fractures , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[7]  R. Aujla,et al.  The management of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective study between conservative management, traditional open spinal surgery and minimally interventional spinal surgery , 2015, SpringerPlus.

[8]  Dong-Eun Shin,et al.  Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fracture , 2015, Asian spine journal.

[9]  Chien-Lin Liu,et al.  Fusion may not be a necessary procedure for surgically treated burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spines: a follow-up of at least ten years. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  L. Latta,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of four- versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  B. Aarabi,et al.  AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System: Fracture Description, Neurological Status, and Key Modifiers , 2013, Spine.

[12]  S. Liew,et al.  Epidemiological Trends of Spine Trauma: An Australian Level 1 Trauma Centre Study , 2013, Global spine journal.

[13]  V. Bachhal,et al.  The role of fusion in the management of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by short segment pedicle screw fixation: a prospective randomised trial. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  Dong Jun Kim,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) , 2010, Asian spine journal.

[15]  Mehmet Yetiş,et al.  Results of 'two above- one below approach' with intermediate screws at the fracture site in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. , 2010, The Kobe journal of medical sciences.

[16]  Kyungsoo Kim,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of instrumentation techniques in treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a finite element analysis , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[17]  L. Dai,et al.  Posterior short-segment fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. a five to seven-year prospective randomized study. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  R. McLain The Biomechanics of Long Versus Short Fixation for Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures , 2006, Spine.

[19]  R. Hurlbert,et al.  A New Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries: The Importance of Injury Morphology, the Integrity of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex, and Neurologic Status , 2005, Spine.