Impedance spectroscopy to monitor fracture healing

An estimated 7.9 million fracture injuries occur each year in the United States, of which a substantial fraction result in delayed or non-union. Current methods of monitoring fracture healing include taking x-rays and making clinical observations. However, x-ray confirmation of bone healing typically lags behind biologic healing, and physician assessment of healing is fraught with subjectivity. No standardized methods exist to assess the extent of healing that has taken place in a fracture. Without such knowledge, interventions to aid healing and prevent fracture non-union are often delayed, leading to increased morbidity and suffering to patients. We are developing an objective measurement tool that utilizes electrical impedance spectroscopy to distinguish between the various types of tissue present during the different stages of fracture healing. Preliminary measurements of cadaveric tissues reveal adequate spread in impedance measurements and differences in frequency response among different tissue types. Electrodes implanted in a simulated fracture created in an ex vivo cadaver model yield promising results for our system's ability to differentiate between the stages of fracture healing.

[1]  R Wytch,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography: a review of current literature. , 1994, European journal of radiology.

[2]  S. P. Whiley Evaluating fracture healing using digital X-ray image analysis , 2011 .

[3]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of mammalian tissues from 0.1 to 100 MHz: a summary of recent data. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  R. Sundararajan,et al.  Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Study of Biological Tissues. , 2008, Journal of electrostatics.

[6]  B. Mckibbin,et al.  The biology of fracture healing in long bones. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  B. Jakoby,et al.  Position-dependent characterization of bone tissue with electrical impedance spectroscopy , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sensors.

[8]  H. Frost,et al.  The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  L. Claes,et al.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Ralph S. Marcucio,et al.  Fracture Repair and Bone Grafting , 2011 .

[11]  G. Paiement,et al.  The importance of the blood supply in the healing of tibial fractures. , 1995, Contemporary orthopaedics.

[12]  Toby King,et al.  The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. , 2016, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  D.I. Fotiadis,et al.  Ultrasonic monitoring of bone fracture healing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  Ioana Ciuchi,et al.  Impedance Spectroscopy characterization of bone tissues , 2010 .

[15]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Saam Morshed,et al.  Current Options for Determining Fracture Union , 2014, Advances in medicine.

[17]  Vivek Subramanian,et al.  Impedance sensing device enables early detection of pressure ulcers in vivo , 2015, Nature Communications.