论文信息 - Unravelling causation: An empirical analysis of contingent protection in Australia - 字舞流文

Unravelling causation: An empirical analysis of contingent protection in Australia

D. Feaver | Kenneth G. Wilson

[1] D. Feaver,et al. Unlocking Australia's Contingent Protection Black Box , 1998 .

[2] D. Feaver. A Regulatory Analysis of Australia's Anti-dumping Law and Policy: Statutory Failure or Regulatory Capture? , 1997 .

[3] Edwin A. Vermulst,et al. Injury in Anti-Dumping ProceedingsThe Need to Look Beyond the Uruguay Round Results , 1994, Journal of World Trade.

[4] Jeffrey W. Steagall,et al. An analysis of ITC decisions in antidumping, countervailing duty and safeguard cases , 1994 .

[5] J. Waelbroeck,et al. Antidumping and countervailing duty decisions in the E.C. and in the U.S.: An experiment in comparative political economy , 1994 .

[6] Jeffrey W. Steagall,et al. An Analysis of Factors Influencing Itc Decisions in Antidumoing, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Cases , 1993 .

[7] J. Francois. Countervailing the Effects of Subsidies: An Economic Analysis , 1992, Journal of World Trade.

[8] P. Tharakan. Policy implications of antidumping measures , 1991 .

[9] Tracy W. Murray,et al. A method for estimating injury caused by unfair trade practices , 1989 .

[10] Michael S. Knoll. An Economic Appproach to the Determination of Injury Under United States Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law , 1989 .

[11] Douglas Nelson,et al. The political economy of administered protection , 1982 .