Full-beam performances of a PET detector with synchrotron therapeutic proton beams

Treatment quality assessment is a crucial feature for both present and next-generation ion therapy facilities. Several approaches are being explored, based on prompt radiation emission or on PET signals by [Formula: see text]-decaying isotopes generated by beam interactions with the body. In-beam PET monitoring at synchrotron-based ion therapy facilities has already been performed, either based on inter-spill data only, to avoid the influence of the prompt radiation, or including both in-spill and inter-spill data. However, the PET images either suffer of poor statistics (inter-spill) or are more influenced by the background induced by prompt radiation (in-spill). Both those problems are expected to worsen for accelerators with improved duty cycle where the inter-spill interval is reduced to shorten the treatment time. With the aim of assessing the detector performance and developing techniques for background reduction, a test of an in-beam PET detector prototype was performed at the CNAO synchrotron-based ion therapy facility in full-beam acquisition modality. Data taken with proton beams impinging on PMMA phantoms showed the system acquisition capability and the resulting activity distribution, separately reconstructed for the in-spill and the inter-spill data. The coincidence time resolution for in-spill and inter-spill data shows a good agreement, with a slight deterioration during the spill. The data selection technique allows the identification and rejection of most of the background originated during the beam delivery. The activity range difference between two different proton beam energies (68 and 72 MeV) was measured and found to be in sub-millimeter agreement with the expected result. However, a slightly longer (2 mm) absolute profile length is obtained for in-spill data when compared to inter-spill data.

[1]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Range assessment in particle therapy based on prompt γ-ray timing measurements , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Vision 20/20: Positron emission tomography in radiation therapy planning, delivery, and monitoring. , 2015, Medical physics.

[3]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  A Compton imager for in-vivo dosimetry of proton beams—A design study , 2011 .

[4]  G Sportelli,et al.  First full-beam PET acquisitions in proton therapy with a modular dual-head dedicated system , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Piergiorgio Cerello,et al.  Performance of a fast acquisition system for in-beam PET monitoring tested with clinical proton beams , 2015 .

[6]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Random coincidences during in-beam PET measurements at microbunched therapeutic ion beams , 2005 .

[7]  Kimberlee J. Kearfott A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography: Comment , 1985 .

[8]  E. Fiorina An integrated system for the online monitoring of particle therapy treatment accuracy , 2016 .

[9]  F. Licciulli,et al.  The INSIDE project: Innovative solutions for in-beam dosimetry in hadrontherapy , 2015 .

[10]  M. J. Berger ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer programs for calculating stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions , 1992 .

[11]  Reuven Ramaty,et al.  Nuclear Deexcitation Gamma-Ray Lines from Accelerated Particle Interactions , 2001 .

[12]  Denis Dauvergne,et al.  Real-time monitoring of the Bragg-peak position in ion therapy by means of single photon detection , 2010, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[13]  K. Perez Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment , 2014 .

[14]  G Janssens,et al.  Prompt gamma imaging of proton pencil beams at clinical dose rate , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[16]  R. Bugalho,et al.  TOFPET ASIC for PET applications , 2013 .

[17]  W. Kaye,et al.  Evaluation of a multistage CdZnTe Compton camera for prompt γ imaging for proton therapy , 2015 .

[18]  Giacomo Cuttone,et al.  An in-beam PET system for monitoring ion-beam therapy: test on phantoms using clinical 62 MeV protons , 2014 .

[19]  Georges El Fakhri,et al.  Proton Therapy Verification with PET Imaging , 2013, Theranostics.

[20]  Keiichi Nakagawa,et al.  The development and clinical use of a beam ON-LINE PET system mounted on a rotating gantry port in proton therapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  P. Verhulst Recherches mathématiques sur la loi d’accroissement de la population , 1845, Nouveaux mémoires de l'Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres de Bruxelles.

[23]  Denis Dauvergne,et al.  Design of a Compton camera for 3D prompt-γ imaging during ion beam therapy , 2011 .

[24]  Jong-Won Kim,et al.  Pinhole Camera Measurements of Prompt Gamma-rays for Detection of Beam Range Variation in Proton Therapy , 2009 .

[25]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  First Compton telescope prototype based on continuous LaBr3-SiPM detectors , 2013 .

[26]  Piergiorgio Cerello,et al.  Development of a PET detector module with Depth of Interaction capability , 2013 .

[27]  Carlo Fiorini,et al.  First clinical application of a prompt gamma based in vivo proton range verification system. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  F. Licciulli,et al.  A study of monitoring performances with the INSIDE system , 2015 .

[29]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Positron emission tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Nicola Belcari,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography: Its 65 years , 2016 .

[31]  K Parodi,et al.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  M. Pullia,et al.  Online monitoring for proton therapy: A real-time procedure using a planar PET system , 2015 .

[33]  K. Parodi,et al.  Suppression of random coincidences during in-beam PET measurements at ion beam radiotherapy facilities , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[34]  F Fiedler,et al.  Short-lived positron emitters in beam-on PET imaging during proton therapy , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Yiping Shao,et al.  In-beam PET imaging for on-line adaptive proton therapy: an initial phantom study , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Time-of-flight neutron rejection to improve prompt gamma imaging for proton range verification: a simulation study , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Chan Hyeong Kim,et al.  Two-dimensional measurement of the prompt-gamma distribution for proton dose distribution monitoring , 2013 .

[38]  Joao Seco,et al.  Proton range verification through prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  Katia Parodi,et al.  On- and off-line monitoring of ion beam treatment , 2016 .

[40]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  Positron emission tomography for quality assurance of cancer therapy with light ion beams , 1999 .