Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease.

BACKGROUND A family history of breast cancer is known to increase risk of the disease, but other genetic and environmental factors that modify this risk are likely to exist. One of these factors is mammographic density, and we have sought evidence that it is associated with increased risk of breast cancer among women with a family history of breast cancer. METHODS We used data from a nested case-control study based on the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS). From 354 case patients with incident breast cancer detected at least 12 months after entry into the NBSS and 354 matched control subjects, we analyzed subjects who were identified as having a family history of breast cancer according to one of three, nonmutually exclusive, criteria. We compared the mammographic densities of case patients and control subjects by radiologic and computer-assisted methods of measurement. RESULTS After adjustment for other risk factors for breast cancer, the relative risks (RRs) between the most and least extensive categories of breast density were as follows: For at least one first-degree relative with breast cancer, RR = 11.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.54-80.39); for at least two affected first- or second-degree relatives, RR = 2.57 (95% CI = 0.23-28.22); for at least one first- or second-degree relative with breast cancer, RR = 5.43 (95% CI = 1.85-15.88). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that mammographic density may be strongly associated with risk of breast cancer among women with a family history of the disease. Because mammographic densities can be modified by dietary and hormonal interventions, the results suggest potential approaches to the prevention of breast cancer in women with a family history of breast cancer.

[1]  J. Struewing,et al.  Population-based study of risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA2 mutation , 1998, The Lancet.

[2]  N F Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Breast disease.

[3]  D. Easton Breast cancer genes—what are the real risks? , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[4]  N. Day,et al.  Family history and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 1997, International journal of cancer.

[5]  P. Hartge,et al.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  N. Boyd,et al.  Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  N F Boyd,et al.  Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images , 1996, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[8]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification , 1996, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[9]  J. Rommens,et al.  The complete BRCA2 gene and mutations in chromosome 13q-linked kindreds , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[10]  D. Bentley,et al.  Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 , 1995, Nature.

[11]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  D. Easton,et al.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[15]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  S. Seal,et al.  Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. , 1994, Science.

[17]  M. Pike,et al.  Changes in mammographic densities induced by a hormonal contraceptive designed to reduce breast cancer risk. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  H. Burhenne,et al.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a Canadian critique. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  T. Sellers,et al.  Effect of family history, body‐fat distribution and reproductive factors on the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  T. Sellers,et al.  Effect of family history, body-fat distribution, and reproductive factors on the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. , 1992 .

[21]  N Risch,et al.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  M. Szklo,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. , 1987, Epidemiologic reviews.

[24]  P. Wingo,et al.  Family history and the risk of breast cancer. , 1985, JAMA.

[25]  J. Gershon-Cohen,et al.  Comparative Anatomy, Pathology, and Roentgenology of the Breast , 1960 .