Target setting and allocation of carbon emissions abatement based on DEA and closest target: an application to 20 APEC economies

Regarded as an effective method for treating the global warming problem, carbon emissions abatement (CEA) allocation has become a hot research topic and has drawn great attention recently. However, the traditional CEA allocation methods generally set efficient targets for the decision-making units (DMUs) using the farthest targets, which neglects the DMUs’ unwillingness to maximize (minimize) some of their inputs (outputs). In addition, the total CEA level is usually subjectively determined without any consideration of the current carbon emission situations of the DMUs. To surmount these deficiencies, we incorporate data envelopment analysis and its closest target technique into the CEA allocation problem. Firstly, a two-stage approach is proposed for setting the optimal total CEA level for the DMUs. Then, another two-stage approach is given for allocating the identified optimal total CEA among the DMUs. Our approach provides more flexibility when setting new input and output targets for the DMUs in CEA allocation. Finally, the proposed approaches are applied for CEA target setting and allocation for 20 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation economies.

[1]  David B. Humphrey,et al.  Megamergers in Banking and the Use of Cost Efficiency as an Antitrust Defense , 1992 .

[2]  Tobias N. Rasmussen,et al.  Allocation of CO2 Emissions Permits: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments , 2000 .

[3]  P. Jones,et al.  Global warming and changes in drought , 2014 .

[4]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies , 2007 .

[5]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  CENTRALISED TARGET SETTING FOR REGIONAL RECYCLING OPERATIONS USING DEA , 2004 .

[6]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading , 1998 .

[8]  Alec Morton,et al.  Incorporating balance concerns in resource allocation decisions: A bi-criteria modelling approach , 2014 .

[9]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Output-Based Allocations of Emissions Permits: Efficiency and Distributional Effects in a General Equilibrium Setting with Taxes and Trade , 2004 .

[10]  R. Kopp Allowance Allocation , 2007 .

[11]  S. Lozano,et al.  Centralized Resource Allocation Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2004 .

[12]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Review of proposals for an Agreement on Future Climate Policy: Perspectives from the responsibilities for GHG reduction , 2013 .

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a DEA approach , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  Liang Liang,et al.  A DEA-based approach for fair reduction and reallocation of emission permits , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[15]  A. Athanassopoulos Decision Support for Target-Based Resource Allocation of Public Services in Multiunit and Multilevel Systems , 1998 .

[16]  Frank Ackerman,et al.  SO2 emissions trading: does it work? , 1997 .

[17]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Estimation of potential gains from mergers in multiple periods: a comparison of stochastic frontier analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis , 2011, Ann. Oper. Res..

[19]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Measuring environmental performance with stochastic environmental DEA: The case of APEC economies , 2014 .

[20]  Jichuan Sheng,et al.  China’s future investments in environmental protection and control of manufacturing industry: lessons from developed countries , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[21]  Ranjit Bharvirkar,et al.  The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emission Trading , 2001 .

[22]  Lei Fang Centralized resource allocation based on efficiency analysis for step-by-step improvement paths , 2015 .

[23]  Zhenming Xu,et al.  Recycling of non-metallic fractions from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): a review. , 2014, Waste management.

[24]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA , 2007 .

[25]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  Transactions Costs in Tradable Permit Markets: An Experimental Study of Pollution Market Designs , 2003 .

[26]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  How can China reach its CO2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development , 2011 .

[27]  Gongbing Bi,et al.  Carbon Emissions Abatement (CEA) allocation and compensation schemes based on DEA , 2015 .

[28]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach , 2007 .

[29]  Li Li,et al.  Economic and environmental evaluation of coal production in China and policy implications , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[30]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[31]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Toshi H. Arimura,et al.  Output-based allocation of emissions permits for mitigating the leakage and competitiveness issues for the Japanese economy , 2011 .

[33]  P. Bogetoft,et al.  Gains from quota trade: theoretical models and an application to the Danish fishery , 2007 .

[34]  J. Pastor,et al.  Centralized resource allocation BCC models , 2009 .

[35]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[36]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[38]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020 , 2013 .

[39]  A. Athanassopoulos Goal programming & data envelopment analysis (GoDEA) for target-based multi-level planning: Allocating central grants to the Greek local authorities , 1995 .

[40]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach , 2004 .

[41]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA , 2014 .

[42]  Jiancang Xie,et al.  Use of four drought indices for evaluating drought characteristics under climate change in Shaanxi, China: 1951–2012 , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[43]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Evaluating Efficiency-Effectiveness-Equality Trade-Offs: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 1995 .

[44]  Yung‐ho Chiu,et al.  Carbon Emission Allowances of Efficiency Analysis: Application of Super SBM ZSG-DEA Model , 2013 .

[45]  Liang Liang,et al.  Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree , 2013 .

[46]  Ray Y. Zhong,et al.  Allocation of emission permits using DEA: centralised and individual points of view , 2014 .

[47]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Energy and emissions efficiency patterns of Chinese regions: A multi-directional efficiency analysis , 2013 .

[48]  Yan Luo,et al.  Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA , 2011 .

[49]  Shiwei Yu,et al.  Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China , 2014 .

[50]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  Revenue-Raising versus Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Preexisting Tax Distortions , 1997 .

[51]  Haoxun Chen,et al.  Closest targets in environmental efficiency evaluation based on enhanced Russell measure , 2015 .

[52]  Liang Liang,et al.  Internal resource waste and centralization degree in two-stage systems: An efficiency analysis , 2016 .

[53]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  CO 2 Emissions and Productivity in APEC Member Economies , 2011 .