Advancing Citizen Science for Coastal and Ocean Research

n Citizen Science, members of the general public collaborate with scientists to generate and use data relating to the natural world. For the many fields of marine research, this is a particularly powerful approach which should not be overlooked. The sheer scale of coastal and ocean environments mean that it would take several lifetimes for scientists to study them alone. By collaborating with citizens, a much greater number of people can be mobilized to gather a wealth of data and develop new scientific knowledge and understanding. The variety of data types which are amenable to Citizen Science, as outlined in the position paper, are great, meaning that there could be a project to suit everyone. Citizen Science can also enable participants to improve their Ocean Literacy, gain new skills and experiences, and can also empower them to participate in the process of delivering future marine policy.Now, more than ever, marine science research is needed to understand the impacts of a world undergoing change. The rise of Marine Citizen Science to help address this need is therefore timely. This paper highlights opportunities, challenges and best practice in Marine Citizen Science, and sets out a list of high-level strategic recommendations for the future development of Marine Citizen Science in Europe. It presents examples of existing Marine Citizen Science initiatives in Europe to illustrate good practice. Common concerns such as data quality and maintaining engagement are discussed, as are future opportunities such as increased use of technology and potential role of Marine Citizen Science in informing marine policy and conservation. The paper closes with a list of high-level strategic recommendations for the future development of Marine Citizen Science in Europe.

[1]  Wesley P. Schultz,et al.  Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda , 2017 .

[2]  Patricia McHugh,et al.  Evaluate development! Develop evaluation! Answering the call for a reflexive turn in social marketing , 2017 .

[3]  M. Witt,et al.  Marine anthropogenic litter on British beaches: A 10-year nationwide assessment using citizen science data. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  E. Vayena,et al.  The dynamics of big data and human rights: the case of scientific research , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  Chung-Ling Chen,et al.  Marine environmental awareness among university students in Taiwan: a potential signal for sustainability of the oceans , 2016 .

[6]  Zachary Dixon.  Material expertise: An ontological approach to stakeholder participation in marine policy , 2016 .

[7]  E. Harvey,et al.  Can citizen science work? Perceptions of the role and utility of citizen science in a marine policy and management context , 2016 .

[8]  Oliver Zielinski,et al.  Citizens and satellites: Assessment of phytoplankton dynamics in a NW Mediterranean aquaculture zone , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[9]  I. Côté,et al.  Evidence for a trophic cascade on rocky reefs following sea star mass mortality in British Columbia , 2016, PeerJ.

[10]  S. Byrne,et al.  Communicating about ocean health: theoretical and practical considerations , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Jaume Piera,et al.  Estimating the Underwater Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient with a Low-Cost Instrument: The KdUINO DIY Buoy , 2016, Sensors.

[12]  J. Hirschfeld,et al.  Economic valuation of Baltic marine ecosystem services: blind spots and limited consistency , 2016 .

[13]  Renzo Kottmann,et al.  MyOSD 2014: Evaluating Oceanographic Measurements Contributed by Citizen Scientists in Support of Ocean Sampling Day † , 2016, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[14]  L. Christidis,et al.  Understanding drivers, barriers and information sources for public participation in marine citizen science , 2016 .

[15]  V. Strezov,et al.  An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  Hans-Georg Frede,et al.  HydroCrowd: a citizen science snapshot to assess the spatial control of nitrogen solutes in surface waters , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Robert J. W. Brewin,et al.  On the Potential of Surfers to Monitor Environmental Indicators in the Coastal Zone , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Effy Vayena,et al.  “We the Scientists”: a Human Right to Citizen Science , 2015 .

[19]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Point process models for presence‐only analysis , 2015 .

[20]  Rebecca Jordan,et al.  Citizen Science as a Distinct Field of Inquiry , 2015 .

[21]  Lucas B. Eastman,et al.  The potential for young citizen scientist projects: a case study of Chilean schoolchildren collecting data on marine litter , 2014 .

[22]  J. Castilla,et al.  Public awareness, concerns, and priorities about anthropogenic impacts on marine environments , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Richard Fox,et al.  Quantifying range‐wide variation in population trends from local abundance surveys and widespread opportunistic occurrence records , 2014 .

[24]  J. Manderson,et al.  Determining the willingness to pay for ecosystem service restoration in a degraded coastal watershed: A ninth grade investigation , 2014 .

[25]  S. Novoa,et al.  The modern Forel-Ule scale: a ‘do-it-yourself’ colour comparator for water monitoring , 2014 .

[26]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[27]  Valentina Melli,et al.  Pelagia benovici sp. nov. (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa): a new jellyfish in the Mediterranean Sea. , 2014, Zootaxa.

[28]  Tomas J. Bird,et al.  Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets , 2014 .

[29]  Tyler D. Eddy,et al.  One hundred-fold difference between perceived and actual levels of marine protection in New Zealand , 2014 .

[30]  T. Hastie,et al.  Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species , 2014, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[31]  Boris Schröder,et al.  The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models , 2013 .

[32]  T. Söderqvist,et al.  Public preferences regarding use and condition of the Baltic Sea—An international comparison informing marine policy , 2013 .

[33]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs , 2013 .

[34]  Michel Bariche,et al.  Citizen science detects the undetected: the case of Abudefduf saxatilis from the Mediterranean Sea , 2013 .

[35]  U. Siebert,et al.  The Stranding Anomaly as Population Indicator: The Case of Harbour Porpoise Phocoena phocoena in North-Western Europe , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  C. G. Suazo,et al.  Fishermen's perceptions of interactions between seabirds and artisanal fisheries in the Chonos archipelago, Chilean Patagonia , 2013, Oryx.

[37]  Alf Ring Kleiven,et al.  Communication between scientists, fishery managers and recreational fishers: lessons learned from a comparative analysis of international case studies , 2013 .

[38]  Carsten Rahbek,et al.  Comparing diversity data collected using a protocol designed for volunteers with results from a professional alternative , 2013 .

[39]  Anthony Davis,et al.  Knowing in context: An exploration of the interface of marine harvesters’ local ecological knowledge with ecosystem approaches to management , 2013 .

[40]  R. Craig Lefebvre,et al.  Social Marketing and Social Change: Strategies and Tools For Improving Health, Well-Being, and the Environment , 2013 .

[41]  Angelos Markos,et al.  Greek Pre-Service Teachers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Environmental Behavior Toward Marine Pollution , 2013 .

[42]  Sandra Henderson,et al.  Citizen science comes of age , 2012 .

[43]  W. Dabin,et al.  The significance of stranding data as indicators of cetacean populations at sea: Modelling the drift of cetacean carcasses , 2012 .

[44]  Celiam . Smith,et al.  Expert variability provides perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of citizen-driven intertidal monitoring program. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[45]  E. McKinley,et al.  Improving marine environmental health through marine citizenship: A call for debate , 2012 .

[46]  P. Ramírez-Monsalve,et al.  On unequal footing: Stakeholder perspectives on the marine strategy framework directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management , 2012 .

[47]  J. Caselle,et al.  Comparing volunteer and professionally collected monitoring data from the rocky subtidal reefs of Southern California, USA , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[48]  Alf Ring Kleiven,et al.  Total Catch of a Red-Listed Marine Species Is an Order of Magnitude Higher than Official Data , 2012, PloS one.

[49]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  Yuri T Yamamoto.  Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[51]  R. Jordan,et al.  Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen‐Science Programs , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  Bramanti Lorenzo,et al.  Involvement of recreational scuba divers in emblematic species monitoring: The case of Mediterranean red coral (Corallium rubrum) , 2011 .

[53]  Gregory M. Ruiz,et al.  Discovery and significance of the colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum in Alaska. , 2011 .

[54]  Emilio Padoa-Schioppa,et al.  Usefulness of volunteer data to measure the large scale decline of “common” toad populations , 2011 .

[55]  J. Olden,et al.  Multi-scale habitat occupancy of invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans) in coral reef environments of Roatan, Honduras. , 2011 .

[56]  P. Larcombe,et al.  Actually achieving marine sustainability demands a radical re-think in approach, not 'more of the same'. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[57]  Krista G. Hilchey,et al.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[58]  H. Lotze,et al.  Spatial and temporal trends in yellow stingray abundance: evidence from diver surveys , 2011, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[59]  Antonio Orlandi,et al.  Unite research with what citizens do for fun: "recreational monitoring" of marine biodiversity. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[60]  Adrien Treuille,et al.  Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game , 2010, Nature.

[61]  Joaquín Tintoré,et al.  Balancing science and society through establishing indicators for integrated coastal zone management in the Balearic Islands , 2010 .

[62]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography , 2010 .

[63]  E. D. Santo.  ‘Whose science?’ Precaution and power-play in European marine environmental decision-making , 2010 .

[64]  B. Orr,et al.  Using fishers' local knowledge to aid management at regional scales: Spatial distribution of small-scale fisheries in the northern Gulf of California, Mexico , 2010 .

[65]  Paul G. Finn,et al.  Assessing the quality of seagrass data collected by community volunteers in Moreton Bay Marine Park, Australia , 2010, Environmental Conservation.

[66]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[67]  S. O'Neill,et al.  An iconic approach for representing climate change , 2009 .

[68]  C. Lintott,et al.  Galaxy Zoo Green Peas: discovery of a class of compact extremely star-forming galaxies , 2009, 0907.4155.

[69]  F. Berkes,et al.  Local Knowledge, Subsistence Harvests, and Social–Ecological Complexity in James Bay , 2009 .

[70]  A. Burger,et al.  SYMPOSIUM PAPER: Bycatch and beached birds: assessing mortality impacts in coastal net fisheries using marine bird strandings , 2009 .

[71]  J. Holmberg,et al.  Estimating population size, structure, and residency time for whale sharks Rhincodon typus through collaborative photo-identification , 2009 .

[72]  C. Prell,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[73]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[74]  J. Bertrand,et al.  Ecosystem trends: evidence for agreement between fishers' perceptions and scientific information , 2008 .

[75]  Corey J A Bradshaw,et al.  Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  C. Lintott,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2008, 0804.4483.

[77]  Michael Elliott,et al.  How good is good? Human values and Europe's proposed Marine Strategy Directive. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[78]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Ocean Citizenship: An Emergent Geographical Concept , 2007 .

[79]  Peter J S Jones,et al.  Offshore marine conservation policies in the North East Atlantic: Emerging tensions and opportunities , 2007 .

[80]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[81]  P. Dearden,et al.  Detecting a decline in whale shark Rhincodon typus sightings in the Andaman Sea, Thailand, using ecotourist operator-collected data , 2006, Oryx.

[82]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  To What Degree are Environmentally Beneficial Choices Reflective of a General Conservation Stance? , 2006 .

[83]  J. Petts,et al.  Expert Conceptualisations of the Role of Lay Knowledge in Environmental Decisionmaking: challenges for Deliberative Democracy , 2006 .

[84]  Finn Danielsen,et al.  Does Monitoring Matter? A Quantitative Assessment of Management Decisions from Locally-based Monitoring of Protected Areas , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[85]  G. Pierce,et al.  Climate change and the cetacean community of north-west Scotland , 2005 .

[86]  Thomas C. Beierle.  USING SOCIAL GOALS TO EVALUATE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISIONS , 2005 .

[87]  B. Semmens,et al.  Observations of a Nassau grouper, Epinephelus striatus, Spawning Aggregation Site in Little Cayman, Cayman Islands, Including Multi-Species Spawning Information , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[88]  John Robinson.  Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development , 2004 .

[89]  S. Jasanoff.  Science and citizenship: a new synergy , 2004 .

[90]  S. M. Evans,et al.  The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers , 2003 .

[91]  Jay Barlow,et al.  ACOUSTIC IDENTIFICATION OF NINE DELPHINID SPECIES IN THE EASTERN TROPICAL PACIFIC OCEAN , 2000 .

[92]  K. Camphuysen,et al.  Seabirds in the North Sea demobilized and killed by polyisobutylene (C4H8)n (PIB) , 1999 .

[93]  T. Caro,et al.  On the Use of Surrogate Species in Conservation Biology , 1999 .

[94]  Tony Alabaster,et al.  Citizen 2000: development of a model of environmental citizenship , 1999 .

[95]  F. Kaiser,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[96]  W. Darwall,et al.  An evaluation of the suitability of non-specialist volunteer researchers for coral reef fish surveys. Mafia Island, Tanzania — A case study , 1996 .

[97]  K. Pond,et al.  Marine litter monitoring programmes—A review of methods with special reference to national surveys , 1995 .

[98]  H. Hungerford,et al.  Changing Learner Behavior through Environmental Education , 1990 .

[99]  E. Hind,et al.  A review of the past, the present, and the future of fishers' knowledge research: a challenge to established fisheries science , 2015 .

[100]  J. P. Richards,et al.  Public perceptions of the UK marine environment , 2014 .

[101]  Dimitris Poursanidis,et al.  The role played by citizen scientists in monitoring marine alien species in Greece , 2013 .

[102]  R. Mcdermott,et al.  Evaluation in Social Marketing , 2011 .

[103]  P. Starr.  Fisher-Collected Sampling Data: Lessons from the New Zealand Experience , 2010 .

[104]  Mordechai Haklay,et al.  ‘Extreme’ Citizen Science, London Citizen Cyberscience Summit , 2010 .

[105]  J. Assis,et al.  Findkelp, a GIS-based community participation project to assess Portuguese kelp conservation status , 2009 .

[106]  A. Huckauf.  Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience , 2008 .

[107]  Brendan Gould,et al.  Survey evaluations to assess marine bioinvasions. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[108]  G. V. D. Meeren,et al.  Spatial variation in abundance and catch composition of Cancer pagurus in Norwegian waters: biological reasoning and implications for assessment , 2006 .

[109]  Courtland L. Smith,et al.  Public ocean literacy in the United States , 2005 .

[110]  Jeremy Wates,et al.  The Aarhus Convention: a Driving Force for Environmental Democracy , 2005 .

[111]  C. Dahl.  Integrated coastal resources management and community participation in a small island setting , 1997 .