Responding under sequence schedules of electric shock presentation.

Lever pressing by squirrel monkeys was examined under second-order schedules of electric shock presentation in which different discriminative stimuli were associated with consecutive components (sequence schedules). Components were always two-minute fixed-interval schedules, and three different overall schedules were studied. Under an overall eight-minute fixed-interval schedule, the first component completion after at least eight minutes had elapsed produced electric shock. The number of components actually completed ranged from one to four; thus, different discriminative stimuli were occasionally associated with electric shock presentation. Under an overall "yoked" variable-ratio schedule, electric shock was presented after completion of a variable number of components; the required number and the distribution of components were matched to those obtained under the overall eight-minute fixed-interval schedule. Under an overall fixed-ratio schedule, electric shock was presented after completion of four components (chained schedule). Under all three sequence schedules, responding in early components was characterized by a pause followed by a single response after the end of the two-minute interval; responding in later components was characterized by a shorter pause followed by positively accelerated responding. Manipulation of overall schedules of shock presentation in these complex behavioral situations produced changes in responding comparable to those ordinarily obtained after similar manipulation of dependencies under both single and second-order schedules of food presentation. These experiments extend the range of conditions and levels of complexity under which responding can be maintained by presentation of electric shock.

[1]  R. T. Kelleher,et al.  Fixed-interval responding under second-order schedules of food presentation or cocaine injection. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  J. Barrett The Estes-Skinner Procedure: Inadequacy of Traditional Interpretations , 1975 .

[3]  E F Malagodi,et al.  Responding maintained under intermittent schedules of electric-shock presentation: "Safety" or schedule effects? , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  J. W. Kearney Differences in Responding under Fixed-Time and Fixed-Interval Schedules of Electric Shock Presentation , 1974 .

[5]  M. Sidman Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal. , 1953, Science.

[6]  J. Barrett,et al.  Effects of alcohol, chlordiazepoxide, cocaine and pentobarbital on responding maintained under fixed-interval schedules of food or shock presentation. , 1976, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[7]  M. Davison,et al.  Successive interresponse times in fixed-ratio and second-order fixed-ratio performance. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  S J Weiss,et al.  An effective and economical sound-attenuation chamber. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  J W McKearney,et al.  Fixed-interval schedules of electric shock presentation: extinction and recovery of performance under different shock intensities and fixed-interval durations. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  R. T. Kelleher CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT IN SECOND‐ORDER SCHEDULES1 , 1966 .

[11]  W. H. Morse,et al.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  F M Webbe,et al.  Second-order schedules of token reinforcement: effects of varying the schedule of food presentation. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  P B Dews,et al.  Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: II. The scalloped pattern of the cumulative record. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  J Deweese,et al.  Second-order schedules: a comparison of chained, brief-stimulus, and tandem procedures. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  W. H. Morse,et al.  Modulation of Elicited Behavior by a Fixed-Interval Schedule of Electric Shock Presentation , 1967, Science.

[16]  J W McKearney,et al.  Maintenance and suppression of responding under schedules of electric shock presentation. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  John de Lorge THE EFFECTS OF BRIEF STIMULI PRESENTED UNDER A MULTIPLE SCHEDULE OF SECOND‐ORDER SCHEDULES , 1971 .

[18]  M. Marr Effects of chlorpromazine in the pigeon under a second-order schedule of food presentation. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  J. Mckearney Effects of d-amphetamine, morphine and chlorpromazine on responding under fixed-interval schedules of food presentation or electric shock presentation. , 1974, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[20]  D. Stubbs,et al.  Second-order schedules and the problem of conditioned reinforcement. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  R. T. Kelleher Conditioned reinforcement in chimpanzees. , 1957, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology.

[22]  L. D. Byrd,et al.  Responding in the squirrel monkey under second-order schedules of shock delivery. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  J. Mckearney Responding under a Constant-Probability Schedule of Electric Shock Presentation , 1974 .

[24]  J. D. Lorge Fixed-interval behavior maintained by conditioned reinforcement. , 1967 .

[25]  J Deweese,et al.  Schedule-induced biting under fixed-interval schedules of food or electric-shock presentation. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[26]  Jonathan Katz,et al.  A comparison of responding maintained under second-order schedules of intramuscular cocaine injection or food presentation in squirrel monkeys. , 1979, Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

[27]  F. Webbe,et al.  Second-order schedules of token reinforcement: comparisons of performance under fixed-ratio and variable-ratio exchange schedules. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[28]  J. Findley,et al.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  J W McKearney,et al.  Responding under fixed-ratio and multiple fixed-interval fixed-ratio schedules of electric shock presentation. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  R. T. Kelleher,et al.  Stimulus functions in chained fixed-interval schedules. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[31]  L. Gollub,et al.  A detailed analysis of the effects of d-amphetamine on behavior under fixed-interval schedules. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[32]  N H AZRIN,et al.  An apparatus for delivering pain shock to monkevs. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[33]  M J Marr,et al.  Sequence schedules of reinforcement. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  L. D. Byrd Responding in the pigeon under chained schedules of food presentation: the repetition of a stimulus during alternate components. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[35]  E F Malagodi,et al.  Responding maintained under fixed-interval and fixed-time schedules of electric shock presentation. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[36]  M. Marr,et al.  Relations between patterns of responding and the presentation of stimuli under second-order schedules. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[37]  L. D. Byrd Responding in the cat maintained under response-independent electric shock and response-produced electric shock. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[38]  R. Shull,et al.  Changing the response unit from a single peck to a fixed number of pecks in fixed-interval schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[39]  A. V. Bacotti Responding under schedules combining response-dependent and response-independent shock delivery. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[40]  B A Schneider,et al.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[41]  R T Kelleher,et al.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. IV: An interlocking shock-postponement schedule in the squirrel monkey. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[42]  P. Killeen On the temporal control of behavior. , 1975 .

[43]  J W McKearney,et al.  Maintenance of Responding under a Fixed-Interval Schedule of Electric Shock-Presentation , 1968, Science.

[44]  J. Barrett,et al.  Behavior simultaneously maintained by both presentation and termination of noxious stimuli. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[45]  F. Webbe,et al.  Schedule interactions in second-order fixed-interval (fixed-ratio) schedules of token reinforcement☆ , 1972 .