Public Demand for Preserving Local Open Space

Increased development results in the loss of forest, farm, range, and other open space lands that contribute to the quality of life of U.S. residents. I describe an economic rationale for growing public support for preserving local open space, based the growing scarcity of open space lands. I test the rationale empirically by correlating the prevalence of open space referenda in U.S. counties to socioeconomic variables, including population density, change in density, per capita income, education, and other factors. Data come from the Trust for Public Land LandVote database and the U.S. Bureau of the Census. The results suggest how key socioeconomic trends—most notably, population growth, rising incomes, development, and increasing open space scarcity—motivate interest and support for preserving open space, when open space lands remain unprotected. The analysis provides a context for discussing policy and management strategies for addressing urban sprawl and open space loss.

[1]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Could State-Level Variation in the Number of Land Trusts Make Economic Sense? , 2003, Land Economics.

[2]  Eric M. White,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of "Forests on the edge: housing development on America's private forests". , 2005 .

[3]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Endangered by Sprawl. How Runaway Development Threatens America's Wildlife , 2005 .

[4]  Natural resources and open space in the residential decision process: a study of recent movers to fringe counties in southeast Michigan , 2004 .

[5]  Susan I. Stewart,et al.  The social aspects of landscape change: protecting open space under the pressure of development , 2004 .

[6]  G. Wolfram.  The Sale of Development Rights and Zoning in the Preservation of Open Space: Lindahl Equilibrium and a Case Study , 1981 .

[7]  N. Sampson,et al.  Forest fragmentation: implications for sustainable private forests. , 2000 .

[8]  Daniel M. Press.  Who Votes for Natural Resources in California? , 2003 .

[9]  B. Roe,et al.  The Effects of Farmland, Farmland Preservation, and Other Neighborhood Amenities on Housing Values and Residential Growth , 2004, Land Economics.

[10]  DOMENICO PARISI,et al.  Civic Responsibility and the Environment: Linking Local Conditions to Community Environmental Activeness , 2004 .

[11]  Warren M. Lee.  National Resources Conservation Service , 1997 .

[12]  Paul Mohai,et al.  Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism , 1992 .

[13]  R. W. Burgess,et al.  BUREAU OF THE CENSUS , 1992 .

[14]  J. Duke,et al.  Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process , 2002 .

[15]  Mark E. Lichtenstein,et al.  Urbanization on the US landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century , 2004 .

[16]  D. Glickman,et al.  Managing the Impact of Wildfires on Communities and the Environment: A Report to the President in Re , 2000 .

[17]  J. Wu,et al.  The optimal allocation of conservation funds , 1999 .

[18]  G. Norman.  The Future of the United States , 1875 .

[19]  Lance deHaven-Smith.  Environmental Belief Systems , 1988 .

[20]  David Berry.  Preservation of Open Space and the Concept of Value , 1976 .

[21]  J. Kline,et al.  Public Preferences Regarding the Goals of Farmland Preservation Programs , 1996 .

[22]  P. Shapiro,et al.  Private Preference for Collective Goods Revealed Through Voting on Referenda , 1975 .

[23]  Dennis Wichelns,et al.  Using Referendum Data to Characterize Public Support for Purchasing Development Rights to Farmland , 1994 .

[24]  Jerry J. Vaske,et al.  A Value-Attitude-Behavior Model Predicting Wildland Preservation Voting Intentions , 1999 .

[25]  Dennis Wichelns,et al.  Measuring heterogeneous preferences for preserving farmland and open space , 1998 .

[26]  The Geography of Support for Open-Space Initiatives: A Case Study of New Jersey's 1998 Ballot Measure , 2004 .

[27]  Maureen E. Austin,et al.  Out in the country: sprawl and the quest for nature nearby , 2004 .

[28]  Voting Preferences and the Environment in the American Electorate: The Discussion Extended , 2003 .

[29]  Mary Formanowicz,et al.  United States Census 1900 , 1907 .

[30]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  DEMAND FOR ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS : EVIDENCE FROM VOTING PATTERNS ON CALIFORNIA INITIATIVES * , 2008 .

[31]  D. Bengston,et al.  Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States , 2004 .

[32]  T. Daniels.  Integrated Working Landscape Protection: The Case of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania , 2000 .