Adaptation of forages to climate, soils and use in smallholder farming systems in southeast Asia.

The Forages for Smallholders Project (FSP) actively involved farmers in evaluating forage varieties for smallholder farming systems in Southeast Asia. The combination of ‘traditional’ evaluation techniques (nursery and regional evaluations) with farmer-led, informal evaluation of forages by farmer experimenters on their own farms resulted in the identification of a small range of robust, broadly adapted forage varieties. Most of these varieties have already been adopted and integrated in various ways into upland farming systems in the region. Farmer experimenters not only provided a huge amount of information on environmental adaptation of forage varieties but also on ways of growing, managing and using forages in smallholder upland farms. WORKING with smallholder farmers to develop appropriate technologies for their farms requires not only a sound ‘partnership’ approach but also ‘knowledge’ and ‘technologies’ which farmers can use and adapt to their particular situations. In the case of forages, farmers need access to forage varieties that are: 1. adapted to the climate and soils; 2. suited to the intended use (e.g. what type of feed, environmental application); and 3. fit into the farming system. The ‘traditional’ approach to forage species evaluation was to conduct a small plot evaluation on agricultural research stations. Species with high yields were selected and further tested in larger plots to elicit agronomic information on management and feeding value. Much information on forage varieties has been generated in this way in many countries and is available in reports and the scientific literature. Unfortunately, few smallholder farmers have ever adopted forage varieties and thus little is known about needs of smallholder farmers, the suitability of different forages to fulfill these needs and how forages can be integrated into smallholder farming systems. The Forages for Smallholder Project (FSP) tried to overcome this limitation by including farmers early in the species evaluation process and by providing feedback of their experiences to other partners in the evaluation process. The objective of the evaluation was to identify ‘forage options’ which development workers could offer smallholder farmers in Southeast Asia for adaptation and integration on their farms.

[1]  S. Fujisaka,et al.  Trees, grasses, and weeds: species choices in farmed-developed contour hedgerows , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[2]  B. Riera,et al.  Geography and Climate , 2001 .

[3]  J. Hacker,et al.  Potential new Brachiaria cultivars for the seasonally dry tropics. , 2000 .

[4]  Xu Minggang,et al.  Forage research on the red soils of south central China. , 2000 .

[5]  D. K. Hau,et al.  The Amarasi farming system, its economic aspects and the adoption of improved cattle feeding and group pen systems. , 2000 .

[6]  P. Horne,et al.  Developing forage technologies with smallholder farmers: how to select the best varieties to offer farmers in Southeast Asia , 1999 .

[7]  M. Versteeg,et al.  Farmers' adoptability of Mucuna fallowing and agroforestry technologies in the coastal savanna of Benin. , 1998 .

[8]  B. Triomphe,et al.  Cover crops in hillside agriculture : farmer innovation with Mucuna , 1998 .

[9]  B. H. Dzowela,et al.  Leucaena in smallholder farming systems in Africa: challenges for development. , 1998 .

[10]  T. M. Ibrahim,et al.  Agronomic adaptation to environmental challenges in the genus Leucaena , 1998 .

[11]  W. Thorpe,et al.  Adoption of planted forages by smallholder dairy farmers in coastal lowland Kenya , 1998 .

[12]  L. Ramírez,et al.  Leucaena in Latin American farming systems : Challenges for development , 1998 .

[13]  S. Wiggins,et al.  Returns to smallholder dairying in the Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania , 1997 .

[14]  C. Wortmann,et al.  Using trial follow-up surveys to assess varietal adoption: The case of beans , 1997 .

[15]  S. Shabala Leaf Temperature Kinetics Measure Plant Adaptation to Extreme High Temperatures , 1996 .

[16]  J. Stewart,et al.  Gliricidia sepium: genetic resources for farmers , 1996 .

[17]  G. Wickens,et al.  Role of Acacia Species in the Rural Economy of Dry Africa and the Near East , 1995 .

[18]  J. D'mello,et al.  Tropical Legumes in Animal Nutrition , 1995 .

[19]  S. G. Reynolds Pasture-cattle-coconut systems , 1995 .

[20]  J. D'mello,et al.  Intake of tropical legumes. , 1995 .

[21]  J. D'mello,et al.  Anti-nutritional factors in forage legumes. , 1995 .

[22]  C. Lascano,et al.  The effect of mixtures of sun-dried tropical shrub legumes on intake and nitrogen balance by sheep , 1995 .

[23]  C. Lascano,et al.  The effect of wilting and drying on intake rate and acceptability by sheep of the shrub legume Cratylia argentea , 1995 .

[24]  D. Macqueen,et al.  Calliandra calothyrsus - a multipurpose tree legume for humid locations. , 1994 .

[25]  R. Gutteridge,et al.  The perennial Sesbania species. , 1994 .

[26]  S. Fujisaka A Case of Farmer Adaptation and Adoption of Contour Hedgerows for Soil Conservation , 1993, Experimental Agriculture.

[27]  S. El‐Swaify World Soil Erosion and Conservation: Soil erosion and conservation in the humid tropics , 1993 .

[28]  S. Fujisaka,et al.  Contour hedgerow technology in the Philippines : not yet sustainable. , 1993 .

[29]  K. F. Wiersum,et al.  Calliandra calothyrsus Meissn. , 1992 .

[30]  R. Daniels,et al.  Infiltration Variability and Correlations with Surface Soil Properties for an Eroded Hapludult , 1991 .

[31]  J. Hoorweg,et al.  Dairy development and nutrition in Kilifi District, Kenya , 1991 .

[32]  Lauren MacLennan,et al.  Annual research report , 1991 .

[33]  A. Young The potential of agroforestry for soil conservation , 1990 .

[34]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Soil Erosion in the Tropics: Principles and Management , 1990 .

[35]  S. Aziz Smallholder livestock development in Pakistan. , 1990 .

[36]  E. Barbier The Farm-Level Economics of Soil Conservation: The Uplands of Java , 1990 .

[37]  P. Nair,et al.  Agroforestry: A Decade of Development , 1987 .

[38]  R. F. Follett,et al.  Soil erosion and crop productivity , 1987 .

[39]  B. Kang,et al.  The development of alley cropping as a promising agroforestry technology. , 1987 .

[40]  P. Mella,et al.  Investigations on the growth and resistance to Heteropsylla cubana of Leucaena and other tree legumes in Timor, Indonesia. , 1987 .

[41]  A. Young The potential of agroforestry for soil conservation. Part I. Erosion control. , 1986 .

[42]  M. Stocking,et al.  Crop yield losses from the erosion of alfisols , 1986 .

[43]  H. Shelton,et al.  Adoption of the shrub legume Leucaena leucocephala in central and southeast Queensland. , 1986 .

[44]  East-West Environment,et al.  Community forestry : lessons from case studies in Asia and the Pacific region , 1985 .

[45]  Sulabha Brahme Producers' Cooperatives; Experience and Lessons from India , 1984 .

[46]  T. N. Barry,et al.  The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep , 1984, British Journal of Nutrition.

[47]  R. Lal Soil Erosion from Tropical Arable Lands and its Control , 1984 .

[48]  J. Dawson,et al.  The utilization of rice straw fed to Zebu cattle and swamp buffalo as influenced by alkali treatment and Leucaena supplementation , 1983 .

[49]  L. C. Kearl,et al.  Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants in Developing Countries , 1982 .

[50]  V. Parera Lamtoronisasi in Kabupaten Sikka. , 1980 .

[51]  J. Metzner Lamtoronisasi: An Experiment in Soil Conservation , 1976 .

[52]  G. W. Burton Factors Influencing Seed Setting in Several Southern Grasses 1 , 1943 .

[53]  G. W. Burton The establishment of Bahia grass Paspalum noratum. , 1940 .

[54]  H W Wiley,et al.  THE ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTS. , 1886, Science.