Ability, location and household demand for Internet bandwidth

This paper examines consumer preferences for Internet bandwidth, focusing on technical ability and urban/rural location as sources of preference heterogeneity. An economic model is outlined that shows that ability decreases the effective price of bandwidth. As a result of this decrease, part of the total effect of an increase in ability will always be an increase in the demand for bandwidth. The implication is empirically investigated with an econometric approach that overcomes the limitations of the aggregated data that is currently available to describe consumer preferences. Results show that high-ability, urban consumers are willing to pay a substantive monthly premium for an improvement in bandwidth relative to rural consumers.

[1]  Donald M. Waldman,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/jae.984 LEARNING AND FATIGUE DURING CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: A COMPARISON OF ONLINE AND MAIL SURVEY MODES , 2022 .

[2]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs , 1996 .

[3]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership , 2005 .

[4]  Gregory S. Crawford The Impact of the 1992 Cable Act on Household Demand and Welfare , 2000 .

[5]  J. Prieger The Supply Side of the Digital Divide: Is There Equal Availability in the Broadband Internet Access Market? , 2003 .

[6]  Walter Beckert,et al.  Estimation of Heterogeneous Preferences, with an Application to Demand for Internet Services , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data , 1985 .

[8]  R. Fairlie Race and the Digital Divide , 2004 .

[9]  Steven T. Berry,et al.  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium , 1995 .

[10]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Internet Adoption and Usage Patterns are Different: Implications for the Digital Divide , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[11]  James E. Prieger,et al.  The Broadband Digital Divide and the Nexus of Race, Competition, and Quality , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[12]  Jaison R. Abel,et al.  Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Infrastructure in Rural America: Measuring the Digital Divide , 2002 .

[13]  Donald M. Waldman Computation in duration models with heterogeneity , 1985 .

[14]  J. Heckman,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data: Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions , 1985 .

[15]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions: An overview , 1985 .

[16]  Scott J. Savage,et al.  The Effects of Competition on the Price for Cable Modem Internet Access , 2007 .

[17]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  Estimating the extent of potential competition in the Korean mobile telecommunications market: Switching costs and number portability , 2006 .