Outcomes in work-related upper extremity and low back injuries: results of a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND The outcomes of treatment for work-related injuries and illnesses are multidimensional and complex, but have rarely been explored in detail. This study was intended to provide information on a sample of workers representing a range of jobs and employers typical of the workers compensation system. METHODS A mailed, self-report survey measuring multiple dimensions was conducted. Identified through the New Hampshire Division of Workers' Compensation First Report of Injury database, a sample of workers with injuries to their lower back (60%) or upper extremities (40%) a year prior to the study were surveyed. Response rate was 80% (N=169; upper extremity cases=70; low back cases=99). RESULTS Most (82.8%) were working one year post-injury. Over half reported residual effects of the injury on work or activities of daily living. Many working subjects reported persistent injury-related anxiety and pain at the end of the work day, worse in those with low back pain compared to those with upper extremity injuries. Almost 40% of those who returned to work suffered a reinjury. Forty-four percent of respondents suffered significant injury-related financial problems, which were worse in those who had been out of work for longer periods. CONCLUSIONS Occupational musculoskeletal injuries do result in significant, long-term adverse physical, economic, and psychological consequences, as demonstrated in self-reported surveys.

[1]  A. Stewart,et al.  Psychometric Considerations in Functional Status Instruments , 1990 .

[2]  E. Volinn,et al.  Back Sprain in Industry: The Role of Socioeconomic Factors in Chronicity , 1991, Spine.

[3]  Sheldon Greenfield,et al.  Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care , 1990, Frontiers of Primary Care.

[4]  M Feuerstein,et al.  Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale. , 1997, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[5]  M. Liang,et al.  The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument: Reliability and Validity Tests , 1996, Spine.

[6]  G. Pransky,et al.  Outcomes research: implications for occupational health. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  J J Bartko,et al.  ON THE METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITY , 1976, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[8]  John P. Robinson,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation , 1991 .

[9]  Frymoyer Jw,et al.  An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. , 1991 .

[10]  R. Butler,et al.  The error of using returns-to-work to measure the outcomes of health care. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[11]  W. Fordyce,et al.  A Prospective Study of Work Perceptions and Psychosocial Factors Affecting the Report of Back Injury , 1991, Spine.

[12]  D L Patrick,et al.  Measurement of health status in the 1990s. , 1990, Annual review of public health.

[13]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[14]  A Cheadle,et al.  Factors influencing the duration of work-related disability: a population-based study of Washington State workers' compensation. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[15]  Usaid,et al.  Annual statistical bulletin , 1950 .