Selection of a taxonomic level for soil mapping using diversity and map purity indices: A case study from an Iranian arid region

Abstract There is a growing demand for digital soil maps for environmental planning, modeling and management. If mapped soil classes are taken from a hierarchical taxonomic system, a question arises: which taxonomic level is most appropriate to be depicted on the map with a given sample size, available environmental covariates and the strength of predictive relations between covariates and the soil classes? Pedodiversity, the study and measurement of soil diversity, can be considered as a framework to analyze spatial patterns depicted on soil maps. This paper discusses the selection of the taxonomic level for soil mapping in an arid region in southeast Iran on the basis of (1) the purity of a digital soil class map derived from an artificial neural network (ANN) prediction method using environmental covariates and (2) pedodiversity indices of these soil maps. The prediction of soil classes and the calculation of diversity indices were carried out for taxonomic categories of order, suborder, great group, and subgroup. Using the feed forward back-propagation algorithm, three-layer ANNs with input, hidden and output layers were trained for soil class prediction at each category level. In most predictions, the combined use of terrain attributes and geomorphic surfaces provided the best results. When the taxonomic level changed from order to subgroup, the purity decreased, whereas the values of the diversity indices increased. The highest purity and lowest diversity are observed at the order level, indicating a good quality map in terms of its purity, but reflecting only little soil diversity, thus with a low usage potential. On the other hand, soil maps at the level of subgroup illustrate high diversity and low purity, so that the predicted map units are highly uncertain. This map is also inappropriate for users. We introduced an index combining the diversity and purity which indicated that the best taxonomic level for soil mapping in the study area is the great group, with both high diversity and purity.

[1]  R. Huggett,et al.  Soil chronosequences, soil development, and soil evolution: a critical review , 1998 .

[2]  Thorsten Behrens,et al.  Digital soil mapping using artificial neural networks , 2005 .

[3]  P. Gong,et al.  Pedodiversity in the United States of America , 2003 .

[4]  Anònim Anònim.  Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[5]  Y. Guéro,et al.  Xerolysis: a hypothetical process of clay particles weathering under Sahelian climate , 2002 .

[6]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[7]  J. Phillips,et al.  Soil geomorphic classification, soil taxonomy, and effects on soil richness assessments , 2007 .

[8]  Thorsten Behrens,et al.  Digital soil mapping in Germany—a review , 2006 .

[9]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  Divergent evolution and the spatial structure of soil landscape variability , 2001 .

[10]  A. Zhu.  Mapping soil landscape as spatial continua: The Neural Network Approach , 2000 .

[11]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[12]  P. Krasilnikov,et al.  Soilscapes in the dynamic tropical environments: The case of Sierra Madre del Sur , 2011 .

[13]  R J Poppi,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks to the classification of soils from São Paulo State using near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2001, The Analyst.

[14]  J. Gallant,et al.  A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas , 2003 .

[15]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Sampling for validation of digital soil maps , 2011 .

[16]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Updating the 1:50,000 Dutch soil map using legacy soil data: A multinomial logistic regression approach , 2009 .

[17]  R. Person.  Remote mapping of standing crop biomass for estimation of the productivity of the short-grass Prairie, Pawnee National Grasslands, Colorado , 1972 .

[18]  R. Ferguson.  The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology: B. L. Rhoads and C. E. Thorn (eds) Wiley, Chichester (1996) 481 pp. £65.00 hardback , 1998 .

[19]  Brett Whelan,et al.  Measuring the quality of digital soil maps using information criteria , 2001 .

[20]  J. Phillips.  Global and local factors in earth surface systems , 2002 .

[21]  A-Xing Zhu,et al.  Soil Mapping Using GIS, Expert Knowledge, and Fuzzy Logic , 2001 .

[22]  E. Perfect,et al.  Scaling, fractals and diversity in soils and ecohydrology , 2004 .

[23]  J. Ibáñez,et al.  Pedodiversity: concepts and measures , 1995 .

[24]  M. Longuet-Higgins.  On the Shannon-Weaver index of diversity, in relation to the distribution of species in bird censuses. , 1971, Theoretical population biology.

[25]  Ahmad Jalalian,et al.  Pedodiversity and pedogenesis in Zayandeh-rud Valley, Central Iran , 2006 .

[26]  Prasanna H. Gowda,et al.  Using Thematic Mapper Data to Identify Contrasting Soil Plains and Tillage Practices , 1997 .

[27]  A. Lobo,et al.  Pedodiversity and global soil patterns at coarse scales (with discussion) , 1998 .

[28]  Methods to quantify the pedodiversity of 1 km2 areas — results from southern African drylands , 2010 .

[29]  J. Phillips,et al.  Agricultural soil redistribution and landscape complexity , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  Thorsten Behrens,et al.  Analysis on pedodiversity and spatial subset representativity—the German soil map 1:1,000,000 , 2009 .

[31]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[32]  J. Phillips.  Weathering instability and landscape evolution , 2005 .

[33]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Digital soil mapping : an introductory perspective , 2007 .

[34]  Thorsten Behrens,et al.  Instance selection and classification tree analysis for large spatial datasets in digital soil mapping , 2008 .

[35]  P. Scull,et al.  The application of classification tree analysis to soil type prediction in a desert landscape , 2005 .

[36]  B. Minasny,et al.  journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geoderma Global pedodiversity, taxonomic distance, and the World Reference Base , 2022 .

[37]  J. Ibáñez,et al.  Pedodiversity analysis at large scales: an example of three fluvial terraces of the Henares River (central Spain) , 2004 .

[38]  J. Phillips,et al.  Biomechanical effects, lithological variations, and local pedodiversity in some forest soils of Arkansas , 2004 .

[39]  L. D. Miller,et al.  Remote mapping of standing crop biomass for estimation of the productivity of the shortgrass prairie, Pawnee National Grasslands, Colorado , 1972 .

[40]  A. J. Richardsons,et al.  DISTINGUISHING VEGETATION FROM SOIL BACKGROUND INFORMATION , 1977 .

[41]  Sovan Lek,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction , 1999 .