Endotoxin contamination causes neutrophilia following pulmonary allergen challenge.

Segmental bronchoprovocation (SBP) with allergen was used in an attempt to study eosinophils recruited to the airway 24 h after challenge. Unexpectedly, in the first four patients, neutrophils (rather than eosinophils) were recruited in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids, and we hypothesized that the allergen extracts were contaminated with endotoxin. The extracts used for challenge in the first four patients tested positive for bacterial endotoxin in a limulus amebocyte lysate assay. Rechallenge of one patient from the first group with a comparable dose of an endotoxin-free extract and SBP with endotoxin-free extract in five additional patients resulted in preferential recruitment of eosinophils rather than neutrophils. The number of neutrophils recovered from the challenged segments in the patients challenged with endotoxin-free extract was significantly less than that observed in the first four patients. Taken together, these observations suggest that neutrophil recruitment in the 24-h BAL fluids from the first four patients was probably due to endotoxin contamination of the allergen extract. We caution investigators that endotoxin contamination of allergen extract may alter the cellular inflammation during the late airway response following allergen challenge.

[1]  S. Peters,et al.  Effect of antigen dose on the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the lung by segmental antigen challenge. , 1992, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[2]  S. Wenzel,et al.  Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid mediator levels 5 minutes after allergen challenge in atopic subjects with asthma: relationship to the development of late asthmatic responses. , 1991, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  R. Pauwels,et al.  The effect of endotoxin inhalation on airway responsiveness and cellular influx in rats. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[4]  R. Sergysels,et al.  Effect of inhaled endotoxin on bronchial reactivity in asthmatic and normal subjects. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  S. Wenzel,et al.  Activation of pulmonary mast cells by bronchoalveolar allergen challenge. In vivo release of histamine and tryptase in atopic subjects with and without asthma. , 1988, The American review of respiratory disease.

[6]  T. Casale,et al.  Direct evidence of a role for mast cells in the pathogenesis of antigen-induced bronchoconstriction. , 1987, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[7]  J L Hankinson,et al.  Inhaled endotoxin and decreased spirometric values. An exposure-response relation for cotton dust. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. B. Kay,et al.  Neutrophil chemotactic activity in antigen-induced late asthmatic reactions. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  E. Vigliani,et al.  Effects in man and rabbits of inhalation of cotton dust or extracts and purified endotoxins1 , 1969, British journal of industrial medicine.

[10]  M E Weary,et al.  Understanding and setting endotoxin limits. , 1990, Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association.

[11]  P. Moseley,et al.  Methods for bronchoalveolar lavage in asthmatic patients following bronchoprovocation and local antigen challenge. , 1985, Chest.