Abrupt transitions in variational quantum circuit training

Variational quantum algorithms dominate gate-based applications of modern quantum processors. The so called, {\it layer-wise trainability conjecture} appears in various works throughout the variational quantum computing literature. The conjecture asserts that a quantum circuit can be trained piece-wise, e.g.~that a few layers can be trained in sequence to minimize an objective function. Here we prove this conjecture false. Counterexamples are found by considering objective functions that are exponentially close (in the number of qubits) to the identity matrix. In the finite setting, we found abrupt transitions in the ability of quantum circuits to be trained to minimize these objective functions. Specifically, we found that below a critical (target gate dependent) threshold, circuit training terminates close to the identity and remains near to the identity for subsequently added blocks trained piece-wise. A critical layer depth will abruptly train arbitrarily close to the target, thereby minimizing the objective function. These findings shed new light on the divide-and-conquer trainability of variational quantum circuits and apply to a wide collection of contemporary literature.

[1]  P. Coveney,et al.  Scalable Quantum Simulation of Molecular Energies , 2015, 1512.06860.

[2]  Peter J. Love,et al.  Contextuality Test of the Nonclassicality of Variational Quantum Eigensolvers. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[3]  T. Monz,et al.  Quantum Chemistry Calculations on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator , 2018, Physical Review X.

[4]  Ryan Babbush,et al.  Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes , 2018, Nature Communications.

[5]  J. Biamonte Universal variational quantum computation , 2019, Physical Review A.

[6]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , 2014, 1411.4028.

[7]  Masoud Mohseni,et al.  Layerwise learning for quantum neural networks , 2020, Quantum Machine Intelligence.

[8]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Variational quantum unsampling on a quantum photonic processor , 2019, Nature Physics.

[9]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets , 2017, Nature.

[10]  C. Gogolin,et al.  Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware , 2018, Physical Review A.

[11]  Simone Severini,et al.  Hierarchical quantum classifiers , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[12]  John Shalf,et al.  Understanding Quantum Control Processor Capabilities and Limitations through Circuit Characterization , 2019, 2020 International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC).

[13]  Keisuke Fujii,et al.  Quantum circuit learning , 2018, Physical Review A.

[14]  Marcello Benedetti,et al.  Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models , 2019, Quantum Science and Technology.

[15]  Kunal Sharma,et al.  Noise resilience of variational quantum compiling , 2019, New Journal of Physics.

[16]  Mikhail N. Vyalyi,et al.  Classical and Quantum Computation , 2002, Graduate studies in mathematics.

[17]  Ievgeniia Oshurko Quantum Machine Learning , 2020, Quantum Computing.

[18]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms , 2015, 1509.04279.

[19]  Travis S. Humble,et al.  Quantum chemistry as a benchmark for near-term quantum computers , 2019, npj Quantum Information.

[20]  Ming Li,et al.  Variational Quantum Algorithms for Dimensionality Reduction and Classification , 2019, ArXiv.

[21]  Jonathan Carter,et al.  Computation of Molecular Spectra on a Quantum Processor with an Error-Resilient Algorithm , 2018 .

[22]  G. Galli,et al.  Quantum simulations of materials on near-term quantum computers , 2020, npj Computational Materials.

[23]  Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz,et al.  A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[24]  Frank Pollmann,et al.  Simulating quantum many-body dynamics on a current digital quantum computer , 2019, npj Quantum Information.

[25]  Isaac L. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary edition) , 2011 .

[26]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor , 2013, Nature Communications.

[27]  M. B. Hastings,et al.  Classical and quantum bounded depth approximation algorithms , 2019, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[28]  Michael Broughton,et al.  A quantum algorithm to train neural networks using low-depth circuits , 2017, 1712.05304.

[29]  Edward Grant,et al.  An initialization strategy for addressing barren plateaus in parametrized quantum circuits , 2019, Quantum.

[30]  Travis S. Humble,et al.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.

[31]  Ryan LaRose,et al.  Quantum-assisted quantum compiling , 2018, Quantum.

[32]  Masoud Mohseni,et al.  TensorFlow Quantum: A Software Framework for Quantum Machine Learning , 2020, ArXiv.

[33]  S. Brierley,et al.  Variational Quantum Computation of Excited States , 2018, Quantum.

[34]  Andrey Kardashin,et al.  Machine Learning Phase Transitions with a Quantum Processor , 2019, Physical Review A.

[35]  Jacob Biamonte,et al.  On the universality of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm , 2019, Quantum Information Processing.

[36]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Quantum optimization using variational algorithms on near-term quantum devices , 2017, Quantum Science and Technology.

[37]  L. Lamata,et al.  From transistor to trapped-ion computers for quantum chemistry , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Simon C. Benjamin,et al.  Variational Circuit Compiler for Quantum Error Correction , 2019, Physical Review Applied.