Pregnancy outcomes according to the definition of gestational diabetes

Objective To assess the frequency and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) defined by the criteria according to the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) diagnostic criteria for GDM. Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Six secondary and tertiary delivery hospitals in Finland in 2009. Population Pregnant women (N = 4,033) and their offspring. Methods We used data on comprehensive screening of pregnant women with a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), performed between gestational weeks 24 and 40. OGTT glucose concentrations were used to identify women who fulfilled IADPSG and NICE criteria. While cut-offs according to Finnish national criteria partly overlapped with both criteria, a subgroup of IADPSG- or NICE-positive GDM women remained undiagnosed by Finnish criteria and hence non-treated. They were analysed as subgroups and compared to controls who were negative with all cut-offs. Main outcome measures GDM prevalence, birth weight SD score (BWSDS), large for gestational age (LGA) and caesarean section (CS) rates. Results Among the 4,033 women screened for GDM, 1,249 (31.0%) and 529 (13.1%) had GDM according to the IADPSG and NICE criteria, respectively. The LGA rate was similar in both groups. Regardless of the diagnostic criteria, women with GDM had a higher risk of induced delivery and CSs than controls. In IADPSG-positive non-treated women, offspring’s BWSDS and CS rate were higher than in controls. Conclusions GDM prevalence was 2.4-fold higher according to the IADPSG compared with the NICE criteria but the LGA rate did not differ. BWSDS and CS rate were increased already with mild untreated hyperglycaemia.

[1]  Shubin Hong,et al.  Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review , 2019, BMJ Open.

[2]  Carmelo Velardo,et al.  Clinical Implications of the NICE 2015 Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus , 2018, Journal of clinical medicine.

[3]  M. Gissler,et al.  The changing face of gestational diabetes: the effect of the shift from risk factor-based to comprehensive screening. , 2015, European journal of endocrinology.

[4]  Eran Hadar,et al.  The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: A pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care # , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  P. Catalano,et al.  Perinatal Outcomes Associated With the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Made by The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  G. Roglić,et al.  Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: a World Health Organization Guideline. , 2014, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[7]  M. Gissler,et al.  New population-based references for birth weight, length, and head circumference in singletons and twins from 23 to 43 gestation weeks , 2013, Annals of medicine.

[8]  E. Disse,et al.  Heterogeneity of pregnancy outcomes and risk of LGA neonates in Caucasian females according to IADPSG criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. , 2013, Diabetes & metabolism.

[9]  B. Poindexter,et al.  NIH consensus development conference: diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. , 2013, NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements.

[10]  A. Xiang,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of Pregnancies Complicated by Mild Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Differ by Combinations of Abnormal Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Values , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[11]  A. Dyer,et al.  International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the Diagnosis and Classification of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[12]  Bengt Persson,et al.  International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the Diagnosis and Classification of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[13]  Dwight J Rouse,et al.  A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Hingorani,et al.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2009, The Lancet.

[15]  Bengt Persson,et al.  Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes , 2009 .

[16]  Silvio E. Inzucchi,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008 , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[17]  Thodoris D. Karapantsios,et al.  Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2008 The recommendations in this article are based on the evidence reviewed in the following publication: Standards of care for diabetes (Technical Review). Diabetes Care 17:1514–1522, 1994. Originally approved 1988. Most recent review/revision, October 2007. , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[18]  J. Hiller,et al.  Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Gissler,et al.  Quality of data on subsequent events in a routine Medical Birth Register , 2002, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[20]  M Gissler,et al.  Data quality after restructuring a national medical registry. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.