Optimal active suspension structures for quarter-car vehicle models

Abstract The preliminary design of active vehicle suspensions can be naturally cast into an equivalent linear-quadratic Gaussian (LQG)-optimization problem, where the performance index is an appropriate combination of ride comfort, vehicle handling and suspension design constraints. The vehicle models vary in complexity with the simplest one being the one degree-of-freedom (DOF) quarter-car model which neglects wheel dynamics. The present paper explores the connections between LQG-optimal one DOF and two DOF models. In a recent study (Hrovat, 1987), it was shown that for the optimal two DOF systems, both ride and handling can be improved by reducing the unsprung mass. The limiting one DOF case of zero unsprung mass then represented the maximum possible improvement within the constraint of a single active actuator. It is shown in the present paper that in practice these limiting benefits can be approached via passive dynamic absorbers attached to the unsprung mass. Moreover, the structural constraint of a single active actuator has been relaxed to allow for both secondary suspension and unsprung mass active actuators. Here the maximum possible ride and handling improvements for two DOF systems are obtained in the limiting case of singular control with zero penalty on unsprung actuator force. This absolutely optimal structure turns out to be yet another special one DOF system, which in practice could be approached with the help of active dynamic absorbers.

[1]  A. G. Thompson.  Design of Active Suspensions , 1970 .

[2]  D. Metz,et al.  Optimal ride height and pitch control for championship race cars , 1986, Autom..

[3]  D. Hrovat.  A class of active LQG optimal actuators , 1982, Autom..

[4]  P. Sannuti,et al.  Multiple time-scale decomposition in cheap control problems--Singular control , 1985 .

[5]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Comparative Study of Optimization Techniques for Shock and Vibration Isolation , 1969 .

[6]  Petar V. Kokotovic,et al.  Singular perturbations and time-scale methods in control theory: Survey 1976-1983 , 1982, Autom..

[7]  A. J. Healey,et al.  The Prediction of Passenger Riding Comfort From Acceleration Data , 1978 .

[8]  D. N. Wormley,et al.  Active Control of Vehicle Air Cushion Suspensions , 1972 .

[9]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Theoretical Limitations in Active Vehicle Suspensions , 1986 .

[10]  M. Rabins,et al.  Semi‐Active versus Passive or Active Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Control , 1983 .

[11]  Davor Hrovat,et al.  Optimum Vehicle Suspensions Minimizing RMS Rattlespace, Sprung-Mass Acceleration and Jerk , 1981 .

[12]  A G Thompson.  Optimal and Suboptimal Linear Active Suspensions for Road Vehicles , 1984 .

[13]  E. K. Bender,et al.  Optimum Linear Preview Control With Application to Vehicle Suspension , 1968 .

[14]  P. Kokotovic,et al.  Singular perturbation of linear regulators: Basic theorems , 1972 .

[15]  M. Hubbard,et al.  A comparison between jerk optimal and acceleration optimal vibration isolation , 1987 .

[16]  A. Saberi,et al.  Cheap and singular controls for linear quadratic regulators , 1985, 1985 24th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[17]  Ali Saberi,et al.  Special coordinate basis for multivariable linear systems—finite and infinite zero structure, squaring down and decoupling , 1987 .

[18]  D. Hrovat,et al.  Influence of unsprung weight on vehicle ride quality , 1988 .

[19]  P. Kokotovic.  Applications of Singular Perturbation Techniques to Control Problems , 1984 .

[20]  Peddapullaiah Sannuti,et al.  Direct singular perturbation analysis of high-gain and cheap control problems , 1983, Autom..