Zeuch method-based injection rate analysis of a common-rail system operated with advanced injection strategies

In the present paper the results of an experimental hydraulic analysis of a common rail injection system are discussed. A complete wet system, composed of an automotive injection pump, a rail and a Bosch CRI2.16 injector, is analyzed in realistic operating conditions. The hydraulic analysis is carried out by a Zeuch method-based instrument which is used to measure the injected volume and the injection rate; both these quantities are obtained in mean terms and shot-to-shot resolved in order to investigate the system operation dispersion. The injection rate measurement is supplemented by both the rail pressure and the needle movement measurements to better analyze the injector behavior. Some different advanced injector driving strategies are analyzed, focusing on reduced dwell time operation conditions. Peculiar attention is devoted to the injection process start detection, which is of special interest in case of multiple injections. An accurate analysis of the injection rate time-history suggests that in the initial part of the process the flow is directed toward the injector nozzle (negative flow) and only after a short time the injection rate profile becomes positive, apparently indicating the start of the injection process. In order to define a proper start time detection criterion, the results of the hydraulic analysis were compared with the spray evolution analysis based on imaging carried out by an ensemble-averaged approach. This comparison suggested that the injection start can be derived by the hydraulic analysis: the outflow onset is generally synchronized with the first positive values of the injected volume, computed as the time integral of the injection rate profile.

[1]  R. Reitz,et al.  Effects of Injection Pressure and Nozzle Geometry on D.I. Diesel Emissions and Performance , 1995 .

[2]  C. Arcoumanis,et al.  Analysis of Consecutive Fuel Injection Rate Signals Obtained by the Zeuch and Bosch Methods , 1993 .

[3]  Carlo N. Grimaldi,et al.  Experimental Comparison Between Conventional and Bio-derived Fuels Sprays from a Common Rail Injection System , 2000 .

[4]  Glenn R. Bower,et al.  A Comparison of the Bosch and Zuech Rate of Injection Meters , 1991 .

[5]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[6]  S. Kampmann,et al.  The influence of hydro grinding at VCO nozzles on the mixture preparation in a DI diesel engine , 1996 .

[7]  C. Baumgarten Mixture formation in internal combustion engines , 2006 .

[8]  Takashi Ohta,et al.  A Study on Precise Measurement of Diesel Fuel Injection Rate , 1992 .

[9]  Raul Payri,et al.  Influence of injector technology on injection and combustion development - Part 1: Hydraulic characterization , 2011 .

[10]  B. Mahr,et al.  Future and Potential of Diesel Injection Systems , 2004 .

[11]  Andrea Catania,et al.  Numerical-Experimental Study and Solutions to Reduce the Dwell-Time Threshold for Fusion-Free Consecutive Injections in a Multijet Solenoid-Type CR System , 2006 .

[12]  Takeyuki Kamimoto,et al.  Measurement of the Rate of Multiple Fuel Injection with Diesel Fuel and DME , 2001 .

[13]  M. Battistoni,et al.  Analysis of Diesel Spray Momentum Flux Spatial Distribution , 2011 .

[14]  Andrea Catania,et al.  Numerical-Experimental Study and Solutions to Reduce the Dwell Time Threshold for Fusion-Free Consecutive Injections in a Multijet Solenoid-Type C.R. System , 2006 .

[15]  Raul Payri,et al.  A new methodology for correcting the signal cumulative phenomenon on injection rate measurements , 2008 .

[16]  Wilhelm Bosch,et al.  The Fuel Rate Indicator: A New Measuring Instrument For Display of the Characteristics of Individual Injection , 1966 .

[17]  L. Postrioti,et al.  Momentum Flux Spatial Distribution and PDA Analysis of a GDI Spray , 2012 .

[18]  Carlo N. Grimaldi,et al.  Diesel Common Rail Injection System Behavior with Different Fuels , 2004 .