Quantifying the implications of transformation from even to uneven-aged forest stands

Transformation requires, in part, the setting of goals for the stand structure that should be ultimately achieved. This structure can be described by the number of trees per unit area of different sizes, and their species, before and after the harvest. The structure should be sustainable under the prescribed intensity of harvest and cutting cycle. In addition, the harvest and residual growing stock should be such as to meet management goals in the best possible way. These goals usually involve economic and ecological dimensions that can be quantified with financial criteria such as net present value, and with ecological criteria such as diversity indices. The core of quantification is a growth model suitable for the specific forest type under consideration. The growth model allows the determination of feasible, sustainable regimes, which are rarely unique. The choice of a specific regime can be guided by optimization methods, for example, to maximize economic returns, subject to ecological constraints. Once the desired state is decided upon, the conversion to this state can be achieved by harvesting only the trees in excess of the desired distribution. Alternatively, the conversion can also be optimized, for example, by calculating the regime that brings the stand as close as possible to the desired state, within a specific amount of time.

[1]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Geographic extension of an uneven-aged, multi-species matrix growth model for northern hardwood forests , 1999 .

[2]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Growth models for tropical forests: a synthesis of models and methods , 1995 .

[3]  M. Morrison,et al.  Adequacy of Natural Hardwood Regeneration on Forestlands in Northeastern Pennsylvania , 1998 .

[4]  S. A. Temple,et al.  Area-Dependent Changes in the Bird Communities and Vegetation of Southern Wisconsin Forests , 1983 .

[5]  B. Stokes,et al.  Assessment of costs and impacts for alternative harvesting methods in mixed stands , 1993 .

[6]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .

[7]  M. B. Usher,et al.  A Matrix Model for Forest Management , 1969 .

[8]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  A multi-species, density-dependent matrix growth model to predict tree diversity and income in northern hardwood stands , 1996 .

[9]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Long- and short-term effects of alternative cutting regimes on economic returns and ecological diversity in mixed-species forests , 1993 .

[10]  J. Guldin The Role of Uneven-Aged Silviculture in the Context of Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[11]  H. Williston Uneven-Aged Management in the Loblolly-Shortleaf Pine Type , 1978 .

[12]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Wildlife, Forests and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity , 1989 .

[13]  George B Dantzig,et al.  Determining Optimal Policies for Ecosystems , 1974 .

[14]  M. Hansen,et al.  Data bases for forest inventory in the North-Central Region. , 1985 .

[15]  R. Haight Evaluating the efficiency of even-aged and uneven-aged stand management , 1987 .

[16]  F. Houllier,et al.  Growth and management of mixed-species, uneven-aged forests in the French Jura : implications for economic returns and tree diversity , 1995 .

[17]  J. Osho Matrix model for tree population projection in a tropical rain forest of south-western Nigeria , 1991 .

[18]  Åke E. Andersson,et al.  Systems analysis in forestry and forest industries , 1986 .

[19]  S. Chang Determination of the Optimal Growing Stock and Cutting Cycle for an Uneven-Aged Stand , 1981 .

[20]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY IN MANAGED FORESTS : LESSONS FROM NATURAL FORESTS , 1991 .

[21]  M. Faustmann,et al.  Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry , 1995 .

[22]  Alan R. Ek,et al.  Optimizing the Management of Uneven-aged Forest Stands , 1974 .