A History of Perimetry and Visual Field Testing

Perimetry and visual field testing have been used as clinical ophthalmic diagnostic tools for many years, and this manuscript will provide a brief historical overview of these procedures and the individuals who developed them. Today, we have many different forms of perimetry that are designed to evaluate different locations within the visual pathways and various mechanisms and subsets of mechanisms within the visual system. However, the most widely used method of performing perimetry and visual field testing has not substantially changed for more than 150 years, consisting of detecting a small target superimposed on a uniform background at different locations within the field of view. Although the basic test procedure has remained similar throughout the ages, there have been many advances in test administration, standardization, statistical evaluation, clinical analysis, interpretation, and prediction of outcome based on visual field findings.

[1]  J L Keltner,et al.  Automated and manual perimetry-a six-year overview. Special emphasis on neuro-ophthalmic problems. , 1984, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Richard F. Brubaker,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye , 1976 .

[3]  J L Keltner,et al.  Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters-1983. , 1983, Ophthalmology.

[4]  H Bebie,et al.  STATIC PERIMETRY: STRATEGIES , 1976, Acta ophthalmologica.

[5]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Automated and Manual Periemetry-A Six-Year Overview , 1984 .

[6]  S. Azen,et al.  Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of screening tests for eye conditions in a clinic-based population. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Donald C Hood,et al.  Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique , 2000, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[8]  R. Kardon,et al.  Pupil perimetry. , 1992, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[9]  F T Fraunfelder,et al.  Ocular toxicity of antineoplastic agents. , 1983, Ophthalmology.

[10]  Anders Heijl,et al.  Essential perimetry: The field analyzer primer , 2002 .

[11]  Robert L. Tomsak,et al.  Perimetry , 1987, Neurology.

[12]  H. Chan,et al.  Detection of glaucomatous damage using multifocal ERG , 2005, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[13]  H Bebie,et al.  STATIC PERIMETRY: ACCURACY AND FLUCTUATIONS , 1976, Acta ophthalmologica.

[14]  C A Johnson Diagnostic value of short-wavelength automated perimetry. , 1996, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[15]  J M Wild,et al.  Short wavelength automated perimetry. , 2001, Acta ophthalmologica.

[16]  Wolfgang Fink,et al.  Novel 3D Computer-Automated Threshold Amsler Grid Visual Field Testing of Scotomas in Patients with Glaucoma , 2009, European journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Douglas R. Anderson Perimetry with and without automation , 1987 .

[18]  D A Springer,et al.  Automated perimetry. , 1978, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[19]  P. Sample Short-wavelength automated perimetry: it’s role in the clinic and for understanding ganglion cell function , 2000, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[20]  William H Swanson,et al.  Rapid Pupil-Based Assessment of Glaucomatous Damage , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  W. Stewart,et al.  Bimanual endoscopic orbital biopsy. An emerging technique. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[22]  D. L. Guyton,et al.  Automated perimetry: American academy of ophthalmology recommendation , 1984 .

[23]  L. Frisén New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing , 2002, Vision Research.

[24]  A. Graefe,et al.  Ueber die Untersuchung des Gesichtsfeldes bei amblyopischen Affectionen , 2007, Archiv für Ophthalmologie.

[25]  M. L. Salvetat,et al.  Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[26]  J L Keltner,et al.  Automated perimetry. II. Devices manufactured in the United States and abroad. , 1981, Annals of ophthalmology.

[27]  Randy H. Kardon,et al.  Pupil perimetry Editorial review , 1992 .

[28]  Robert B. MacLeod,et al.  William James: Unfinished business. , 1969 .

[29]  Chris A Johnson,et al.  Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  S Demirel,et al.  Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice. , 1996, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[31]  John Lascaratos,et al.  A historical outline of Greek ophthalmology from the Hellenistic period up to the establishment of the first universities , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[32]  Kimiya Shimizu,et al.  New approach for the glaucoma detection with pupil perimetry , 2010, Clinical ophthalmology.

[33]  J L Keltner,et al.  Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters--1985. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[34]  J L Keltner,et al.  Comparative material on automated and semiautomated perimeters--1986. , 1981, Ophthalmology.

[35]  H. M. Traquair,et al.  An Introduction to Clinical Perimetry , 1943, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[36]  John R. Lynn,et al.  Principles of quantitative perimetry: Testing and interpreting the visual field , 1977 .

[37]  J L Keltner,et al.  Automated perimetry I. A consumer's guide. , 1981, Annals of ophthalmology.

[38]  B. Gloor,et al.  Franz Fankhauser: the father of the automated perimeter. , 2009, Survey of ophthalmology.

[39]  John Gilbey,et al.  Unfinished business , 2010, Nature.

[40]  Paul Henkind The Battle for Vision Care , 1984 .

[41]  Donald C Hood,et al.  Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[42]  K W Clark,et al.  Color contrast perimetry. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  M. Wall,et al.  Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.