Learning and transfer from a simple dynamic system.

The amount of learning gained from being assisted in completing the task of bringing a predator-prey system into equilibrium by controlling the predator population was investigated. Learning was explored both by post-task questioning and by testing for transfer to another predator-prey task. Participants were 28 undergraduate psychology students, all female. They were randomly and evenly split into an experiment group that was subjected to a learning session with the first task before being tested in the second task, and a control group that only performed the second task. What was most needed in the first task was help in sticking to analytically derived conclusions by resisting "common sense" responses. There was a significant transfer effect on performance to the second task, stemming from learning shown by half the participants in the experiment group. The other half showed hardly any learning. Learning in about half the subjects has proven a stable finding.

[1]  B. Brehmer,et al.  Understanding and control of a simple dynamic system , 2003 .

[2]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. , 1999 .

[3]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[4]  B. Brehmer,et al.  Micro-worlds and the circular relation between people and their environment , 2005 .

[5]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Lessons from system dynamics modeling , 1987 .

[6]  D. Gentner,et al.  Reasoning and learning by analogy. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[7]  Erling Moxnes.  Not Only the Tragedy of the Commons: Misperceptions of Bioeconomics , 1998 .

[8]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Reliability and validity of performance measures in microworlds , 2002 .

[9]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processings1 , 1962 .

[10]  J. Forrester.  System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years , 1993 .

[11]  D. Gentner,et al.  Reasoning and learning by analogy. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[12]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[13]  Robert G. Boutilier,et al.  The Development of Dynamic System Reasoning , 1992 .

[14]  Brian Dangerfield,et al.  Projecting dynamic behavior in the absence of a model: An experiment , 1995 .

[15]  J. Sterman.  Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making , 1989 .

[16]  Bent Erik Bakken.  Learning and transfer of understanding in dynamic decision environments , 1993 .

[17]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Analogical problem solving: a hierarchical analysis of procedural similarity. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[19]  Erling Moxnes,et al.  Not only the tragedy of the commons: misperceptions of feedback and policies for sustainable development , 2000 .

[20]  Erling Moxnes.  OVEREXPLOITATION OF RENEWABLE RESOURCES : THE ROLE OF MISPERCEPTIONS , 1998 .

[21]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory , 2000 .

[22]  J. Sterman,et al.  Cloudy Skies: Assessing Public Understanding of Global Warming , 2002 .