Do civil engineering systems need systematising? Tackling complexity – top 10 issues for civil engineering systems

Civil engineering systems is crucially about promoting and developing ‘systems thinking’ to solve or resolve civil engineering problems. The gaps between practice, theory and why things go wrong have narrowed but there is still much to be done. Civil engineering systems thinkers have absorbed and applied the ideas of others. But we have also developed ideas that are relevant outside of our own domain and evidence of our influence is growing. Five examples are modelling, conceptions of uncertainty and risk, the critical importance of the legal ‘duty of care’ and the relationship between ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ systems. Ten generic questions are discussed and tentative answers given. They include, what is the status of a model compared to a theory? What constitutes practical rigour? Are hard and soft systems irreconcilable? What is the nature of truth? How do we characterise and model uncertainty? Are risk and vulnerability different? Do risks incubate or emerge?

[1]  David Okrent,et al.  Man-made disasters , 1998 .

[2]  D. Blockley,et al.  The importance of being process , 2010, Building Bridges.

[3]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[4]  Ruth Deakin Crick,et al.  SYSTEMS THINKING, SYSTEMS DESIGN, AND LEARNING POWER , 2013 .

[5]  J. Mearsheimer.  Structural Realism , 2006 .

[6]  T Byrom,et al.  Doing it differently , 2014 .

[7]  Anjan Chakravartty,et al.  The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science , 2000 .

[8]  Colin B. Brown,et al.  Professional decisions: the central role of models , 2012 .

[9]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Keep it complex , 2010, Nature.

[11]  W. Cui,et al.  Interval probability theory for evidential support , 1990, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[12]  David I Blockley,et al.  Analysing uncertainties: Towards comparing Bayesian and interval probabilities' , 2013 .

[13]  M. Sachs.  Objective Knowledge , 1974 .

[14]  David I Blockley,et al.  Infrastructure Resilience for High-Impact Low-Chance Risks , 2012, Building Bridges.

[15]  David I Blockley,et al.  Measuring judgements to improve performance , 2005 .

[16]  Colin B. Brown,et al.  Professional decisions: responsibilities , 2012 .

[17]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[18]  David I Blockley,et al.  The nature of structural design and safety , 1980 .

[19]  Daniela M. Bailer-Jones,et al.  When scientific models represent , 2003 .

[20]  David I Blockley,et al.  On Communicating the Uncertainty of Risk , 2013 .

[21]  David I Blockley,et al.  The vulnerability of structures to unforeseen events , 2008 .

[22]  David I Blockley.  Managing risks to structures , 2008 .

[23]  Simon,et al.  A HISTORY OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY , 2012 .

[24]  Patrick Godfrey,et al.  Systems 2030 – Emergent themes , 2010 .

[25]  Mark Colyvan,et al.  Is Probability the Only Coherent Approach to Uncertainty? , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.