Segmentation of mass in mammograms using a novel intelligent algorithm

In order to improve the performance of mass segmentation on mammograms, an intelligent algorithm is proposed in this paper. It establishes two mass models to characterize the various masses, and the ones in the denser tissue are represented with Model I, while the ones in the fatty tissue are represented with Model II. Then, it uses iterative thresholding to extract the suspicious area, as well as the rough regions of those masses matching Model II, and applies a DWT-based technique to locate those masses matching Model I, which are hidden in the high gray-level intensity and contrast area. A region growing process restricted by Canny edge detection is subsequently used to segment the rough regions of those masses matching Model I, and finally snakes are carried out to find all the mass regions roughly extracted above. Thirty patient cases with 60 mammograms and 107 masses were used for evaluation, and the experimental result has demonstrated the algorithm's better performance over the conventional methods.

[1]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[2]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Classification of tumors and masses in mammograms using neural networks with shape and texture features , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[3]  Charles K. Chui,et al.  An Introduction to Wavelets , 1992 .

[4]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Efficient Contour Detection Based On Improved Snake Model , 2004, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[5]  A. Chan,et al.  An artificial intelligent algorithm for tumor detection in screening mammogram , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  XU Wei-dong.  Study on model-based pectoral-muscle segment algorithmin mammograms , 2005 .

[7]  Yuan Yan Tang,et al.  Wavelet Orthonormal Decompositions for Extracting Features in Pattern Recognition , 1999, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[8]  Jong Kook Kim,et al.  Adaptive mammographic image enhancement using first derivative and local statistics , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  Min Xiao,et al.  [Research progresses on deformable model in medical image processing]. , 2005, Hang tian yi xue yu yi xue gong cheng = Space medicine & medical engineering.

[12]  Weidong Xu,et al.  Application of CMAC-Based Networks on Medical Image Classification , 2004, ISNN.

[13]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision , 1993, Springer US.

[14]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  You Jian-jie.  Simulated Annealing Based Simplified Snakes for Weak Edge Medical Image Segmentation , 2004 .

[16]  Martin P. DeSimio,et al.  Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Michele Nappi,et al.  Edge Detection: Local and Global Operators , 1998, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[18]  Sheng Liu,et al.  Multiresolution detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Yuan Yan Tang,et al.  Edge Extraction of Images by Reconstruction Using Wavelet Decomposition Details at Different Resolution Levels , 2000, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..