AUTONOMY MEASURES FOR ROBOTS

Robots are becoming increasingly autonomous. Yet, there are no commonly accepted terms and measures of how “autonomous” a robot is. An ad hoc working group has been formed to address these deficiencies, focusing on the unmanned vehicles domain. This group is defining terminology relevant to unmanned systems and is devising metrics for autonomy levels of these systems. Autonomy definitions and measures must encompass many dimensions and serve many audiences. An Army general making decisions about deployment of unmanned scout vehicles may want to only know a value on a scale from 1 to 10, whereas test engineers need to know specifics about the types of environments and missions that the vehicles are expected to deal with. Any system will have to communicate with humans, hence this is an important dimension in evaluating autonomy. The autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS) group is therefore developing metrics based on three principal dimensions: task complexity, environmental difficulty, and human interaction. This paper reports on the current state of the ALFUS metric for evaluating robots.Copyright © 2004 by ASME

[1]  Panos J. Antsaklis,et al.  Towards intelligent autonomous control systems: Architecture and fundamental issues , 1989, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[2]  Hui-Min Huang,et al.  Terminology for Specifying the Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems: Version 1.0 , 2004 .

[3]  Mark A. Boyer.  The American heritage dictionary , 1984 .

[4]  B. P. Zeigler,et al.  High autonomy systems: concepts and models , 1990, Proceedings [1990]. AI, Simulation and Planning in High Autonomy Systems.

[5]  James Albus.  4D/RCS: A Reference Model Architecture for Unmanned Vehicle Systems , 2002 .

[6]  F. E. Collis.  Telerobotics, Automation and Human Supervisory Control by Thomas B. Sheridan, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 393 pages, incl. index £35.95) , 1993, Robotica.

[7]  James S. Albus,et al.  Autonomy Level Specification for Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles: Interim Progress Report | NIST , 2003 .

[8]  John Blair,et al.  AD Hoc Study on Human Robot Interface Issues , 2002 .

[9]  Elena R. Messina,et al.  Autonomy Level Specification for Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles , 2003 .

[10]  Bruce T Clough,et al.  Metrics, Schmetrics! How The Heck Do You Determine A UAV's Autonomy Anyway , 2002 .

[11]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[12]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Awareness in human-robot interactions , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).