The Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance Conference on Research Endpoints Appropriate for Medicare Coverage of New PET Radiopharmaceuticals

The outcomes of a 2011 Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance (MITA) conference helped shape considerations about what might be the most appropriate pathways for the regulatory and payment considerations of new PET radiopharmaceuticals. As follow-up to that conference, MITA convened a second conference of stakeholders to advise payers on what might be acceptable endpoints for clinical trials to support the coverage of novel PET agents. The conference involved experts on imaging and clinical research, providers of PET services, as well as representatives of interested medical societies, the PET industry, and the regulatory and payer communities. The principal outcome of their deliberations was that it was unrealistic to expect trials of new PET radiopharmaceuticals to directly demonstrate a health benefit. Rather, intermediate outcomes, such as a positive change in patient management, would be more efficient and appropriate.

[1]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid PET: A Report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer’s Association , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. , 2012, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  R. Coleman,et al.  Impact of 18F-FDG PET Used After Initial Treatment of Cancer: Comparison of the National Oncologic PET Registry 2006 and 2009 Cohorts , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  B. Hillman,et al.  New Pathways to Medicare Coverage for Innovative PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Report of a Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance (MITA) Workshop , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  R. Coleman,et al.  Impact of Dedicated Brain PET on Intended Patient Management in Participants of the National Oncologic PET Registry , 2010, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[6]  Barry A. Siegel,et al.  The impact of positron emission tomography (PET) on expected management during cancer treatment , 2009, Cancer.

[7]  R. Coleman,et al.  Relationship Between Cancer Type and Impact of PET and PET/CT on Intended Management: Findings of the National Oncologic PET Registry , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Barry A Siegel,et al.  Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.