Cortical encoding of speech acoustics: Effects of noise and amplification

Abstract Objective: To investigate speech stimuli and background-noise-dependent changes in cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in unaided and aided conditions, and determine amplification effects on CAEPs. Design: CAEPs to naturally produced syllables in quiet and in multi-talker babble were recorded, with and without a hearing aid in the right ear. At least 300 artifact-free trials for each participant were required to measure latencies and amplitudes of CAEPs. Acoustic characteristics of the hearing-aid-transduced stimuli were measured using in-the-canal probe microphone measurements to determine unaided versus aided SNR and to compare stimulus acoustic characteristics to CAEP findings. Study sample: Ten participants with normal hearing, aged 19 to 35 years. Results: CAEP latencies and amplitudes showed significant effects of speech contrast, background noise, and amplification. N1 and P2 components varied differently across conditions. In general, cortical processing in noise was influenced by SNR and the spectrum of the speech stimuli. Hearing-aid-induced spectral and temporal changes to the speech stimuli affected P1-N1-P2 components. Amplification produced complex effects on latencies and amplitudes across speech stimuli and CAEP components, and for quiet versus noise conditions. Conclusion: CAEP components reflect spectral and temporal characteristics of speech stimuli and acoustic changes induced by background noise and amplification.

[1]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Absolute Pitch and Planum Temporale , 2001, NeuroImage.

[2]  S. Purdy,et al.  Duration-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex , 2009, Neuroreport.

[3]  Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al.  Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. NOISEX-92: A database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recognition systems , 1993, Speech Commun..

[4]  U. Hoppe,et al.  Contribution of Spectrotemporal Features on Auditory Event-Related Potentials Elicited by Consonant-Vowel Syllables , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[5]  David L Woods,et al.  Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  F. Musiek,et al.  Auditory Cortical Processing in Noise in Normal-Hearing Young Adults , 2012 .

[7]  D. Glista,et al.  A Pilot Study on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children: Aided CAEPs Reflect Improved High-Frequency Audibility with Frequency Compression Hearing Aid Technology , 2012, International journal of otolaryngology.

[8]  H. Dillon,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Duration and Inter-stimulus Interval on Cortical Responses in Infants , 2006 .

[9]  Anders Friberg,et al.  Expressive Timing Facilitates the Neural Processing of Phrase Boundaries in Music: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  D. Glista,et al.  The effect of stimulus choice on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP): Consideration of speech segment positioning within naturally produced speech , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[11]  D Benson,et al.  Patient experiences with multiband full dynamic range compression. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[12]  T. Picton,et al.  Human Cortical Responses to the Speech Envelope , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[13]  S. Gordon-Salant Recognition of digitized CV syllables in multitalker babble. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Clinical Use of Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials as a Measure of Physiological Detection or Physiological Discrimination , 2012, International journal of otolaryngology.

[15]  P. Skinner,et al.  Relation between sound intensity and amplitude of the AER at different stimulus frequencies. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P. Chauvel,et al.  Neuromagnetic source localization of auditory evoked fields and intracerebral evoked potentials: a comparison of data in the same patients , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  D. P. Phillips Neural representation of sound amplitude in the auditory cortex: effects of noise masking , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  H. Davis,et al.  Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  K. Jellinger,et al.  Reprogramming the Cerebral Cortex: Plasticity Following Central and Peripheral Lesions , 2007 .

[20]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Central auditory onset responses, and temporal asymmetries in auditory perception , 2002, Hearing Research.

[21]  Features From Normal and Sensorineural Listeners Nonsense Syllable Test Errors , 1981, Ear and hearing.

[22]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) CDs of Speech and Noise for Hearing Aid Evaluation: Normative Data and Potential Applications , 2002 .

[25]  B. Lavoie,et al.  The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[26]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  G. Adler,et al.  Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials , 1991, Biological Psychiatry.

[28]  David W. Purcell,et al.  Electroacoustic Comparison of Hearing Aid Output of Phonemes in Running Speech versus Isolation: Implications for Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Testing , 2012, International journal of otolaryngology.

[29]  D. Stapells,et al.  Effects of Various Articulatory Features of Speech on Cortical Event-Related Potentials and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[30]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[31]  M. Dorman,et al.  Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials for Hearing Instrument Evaluation in Infants , 2005 .

[33]  Alexander Gutschalk,et al.  Activity associated with stream segregation in human auditory cortex is similar for spatial and pitch cues. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  Obligatory Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential Waveform Detection and Differentiation Using a Commercially Available Clinical System: HEARLab™ , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[35]  B C Moore,et al.  Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[36]  Katrina Agung,et al.  The use of cortical auditory evoked potentials to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in adults. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[37]  Andrea D. Warner-Czyz,et al.  Accuracy of consonant-vowel syllables in young cochlear implant recipients and hearing children in the single-word period. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[38]  H. Dillon,et al.  An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .

[39]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional anatomy of musical processing in listeners with absolute pitch and relative pitch. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  Proprietary fitting algorithms compared with one another and with generic formulas , 2003 .

[41]  Peter Heil,et al.  Coding of temporal onset envelope in the auditory system , 2003, Speech Commun..

[42]  B. Ross,et al.  Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners , 2009, Hearing Research.

[43]  Susan D Scollie,et al.  Hearing aid processing changes tone burst onset: effect on cortical auditory evoked potentials in individuals with normal audiometric thresholds. , 2012, American journal of audiology.

[44]  A. Starr,et al.  The auditory P50 component to onset and offset of sound , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds , 1998, Brain Research.

[46]  D. Kurtzberg,et al.  The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/and/da. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[47]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Predicting Perception in Noise Using Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[48]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Neural Representation of Amplified Speech Sounds , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[49]  Eric D Young,et al.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Lorienne M. Jenstad,et al.  Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part II: Acoustic Measures , 2012, International journal of otolaryngology.

[51]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  Cortical Encoding of Signals in Noise: Effects of Stimulus Type and Recording Paradigm , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[52]  Andrea S. Kelly,et al.  The Contribution of Speech-Evoked Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to the Diagnosis and Measurement of Intervention Outcomes in Children with Auditory Processing Disorder , 2014, Seminars in Hearing.

[53]  Diane Kurtzberg,et al.  Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[54]  K. Tremblay,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Cortical Evoked Potentials Using Naturally Produced Speech Sounds , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[55]  Marshall Chasin,et al.  Hearing Aids and Music , 2004, Trends in amplification.

[56]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Consonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Gibak Kim,et al.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  G. Christopher Stecker,et al.  Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level , 2009, Hearing Research.

[59]  D. Stapells,et al.  The Effects of Broadband Noise Masking on Cortical Event‐Related Potentials to Speech Sounds /ba/ and /da/ , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[60]  M F Dorman,et al.  Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  K. Tremblay,et al.  Speech Evoked Potentials: From the Laboratory to the Clinic , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[62]  W. Wilson,et al.  A systematic review of electrophysiological outcomes following auditory training in school-age children with auditory processing deficits , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[63]  Martin Dahlquist,et al.  Standard Audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 Measurement Procedure , 2010, Trends in amplification.

[64]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Effects of Hearing Aid Amplification and Stimulus Intensity on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[65]  Sergei Kochkin,et al.  MarkeTrak VII: Obstacles to adult non‐user adoption of hearing aids , 2007 .

[66]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Cortical Evoked Response To Acoustic Change Within A Syllable , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[67]  Diane Kurtzberg,et al.  Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Personal Hearing Aids on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[68]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Sensitivity of offset and onset cortical auditory evoked potentials to signals in noise , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[69]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using statistical and visual detection techniques. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[70]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[71]  W S Winholtz,et al.  Conversion of a head-mounted microphone signal into calibrated SPL units. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[72]  M. Hyde,et al.  The N1 response and its applications. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[73]  Wolfgang Skrandies,et al.  Data reduction of multichannel fields: Global field power and Principal Component Analysis , 2005, Brain Topography.

[74]  U. Hoppe,et al.  Effects of Consonant-Vowel Transitions in Speech Stimuli on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Adults , 2011, The open neurology journal.

[75]  D. Stapells,et al.  Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures , 2012, International journal of otolaryngology.

[76]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Cortical sensitivity to periodicity of speech sounds. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.