The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

In the literature there are conflicting reports on the optimal scaffold mean pore size required for successful bone tissue engineering. This study set out to investigate the effect of mean pore size, in a series of collagen-glycosaminoglycan (CG) scaffolds with mean pore sizes ranging from 85 microm to 325 microm, on osteoblast adhesion and early stage proliferation up to 7 days post-seeding. The results show that cell number was highest in scaffolds with the largest pore size of 325 microm. However, an early additional peak in cell number was also seen in scaffolds with a mean pore size of 120 microm at time points up to 48 h post-seeding. This is consistent with previous studies from our laboratory which suggest that scaffold specific surface area plays an important role on initial cell adhesion. This early peak disappears following cell proliferation indicating that while specific surface area may be important for initial cell adhesion, improved cell migration provided by scaffolds with pores above 300 microm overcomes this effect. An added advantage of the larger pores is a reduction in cell aggregations that develop along the edges of the scaffolds. Ultimately scaffolds with a mean pore size of 325 microm were deemed optimal for bone tissue engineering.

[1]  B D Boyan,et al.  Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[2]  S F Hulbert,et al.  Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. , 1970, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  Colleen L Flanagan,et al.  Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[4]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Observations on the Effect of Movement on Bone Ingrowth into Porous‐Surfaced Implants , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Edward Y Lee,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Douglas A Lauffenburger,et al.  Microarchitecture of three-dimensional scaffolds influences cell migration behavior via junction interactions. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[7]  A. Rezania,et al.  Integrin subunits responsible for adhesion of human osteoblast‐like cells to biomimetic peptide surfaces , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  Patrick J Prendergast,et al.  The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. , 2007, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[9]  K. Anselme,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[10]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[11]  P J Prendergast,et al.  A comparison of the osteogenic potential of adult rat mesenchymal stem cells cultured in 2-D and on 3-D collagen glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. , 2007, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[12]  L. Gibson,et al.  Fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[13]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Erratum: Integrin–ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell–substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[14]  J. Davies,et al.  Three-dimensional matrices of calcium polyphosphates support bone growth in vitro and in vivo , 1998, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[15]  C B Sledge,et al.  Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behaviour of seeded canine chondrocytes. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[16]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[17]  J. Heino The collagen receptor integrins have distinct ligand recognition and signaling functions. , 2000, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[18]  Scott J Hollister,et al.  The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Cellular materials as porous scaffolds for tissue engineering , 2001 .

[20]  I. Yannas,et al.  Tissue regeneration by use of collagen-glycosaminoglycan copolymers. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[21]  A. Weinstein,et al.  An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold supports adult rat mesenchymal stem cell differentiation along osteogenic and chondrogenic routes. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[23]  H. Takita,et al.  Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. , 1997, Journal of biochemistry.

[24]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[25]  H. Takita,et al.  Geometry of Carriers Controlling Phenotypic Expression in BMP-Induced Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  Sang Jin Lee,et al.  Macroporous biodegradable natural/synthetic hybrid scaffolds as small intestine submucosa impregnated poly(D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) for tissue-engineered bone , 2004, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[27]  Ioannis V. Yannas,et al.  Tissue and organ regeneration in adults , 2001 .

[28]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Fluorometric assay of DNA in cartilage explants using Hoechst 33258. , 1988, Analytical biochemistry.