Product optimization with the improved marginal moment model

ABSTRACT The probabilistic choice model is an important theory foundation for investigating consumer choice behavior in product optimization. In most studies, probabilistic choice behavior is simulated by the multinomial logit (MNL) model and a product always obtains some market share even though the utility a consumer obtains from buying the product is negative. However, the MNL model has a very restrictive substitution pattern – the independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA). This paper investigates a product optimization problem based on the marginal moment model (MMM). Residual utility is involved in the MMM and negative utility is considered as well. The optimization model of product line design, based on the improved MMM, is established to maximize total profit through three types of problems. The established model fits reality better because the MMM does not have the IIA problem and has good statistical performance. Numerical experiments are carried out to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed model. Meanwhile, the relationships are explored between the optimal solutions and several factors, including the competitive products’ prices, utility variance, rate of cost reduction, and utility of competitive products.

[1]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[2]  J. Blanchet,et al.  A markov chain approximation to choice modeling , 2013, EC '13.

[3]  Songlin Chen,et al.  A Bi-level algorithm for product line design and pricing , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[4]  Jihwan Moon,et al.  Product Line Bundling: Why Airlines Bundle High-End While Hotels Bundle Low-End , 2017, Mark. Sci..

[5]  Denzil G. Fiebig,et al.  The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[6]  Cornelia Schön,et al.  On the product line selection problem under attraction choice models of consumer behavior , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[8]  Peter Boatwright,et al.  A Satisficing Choice Model , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[9]  Lingxiu Dong,et al.  Product Line Pricing in a Supply Chain , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Jerrold H. May,et al.  A Simulation Comparison of Methods for New Product Location , 1983 .

[11]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  Estimation of Choice-Based Models Using Sales Data from a Single Firm , 2014, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[12]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Product Line Design with Deliberation Costs: A Two-Stage Process , 2013, Decis. Anal..

[13]  Xiaobo Li,et al.  On Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Marginal Distribution Choice Models , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[15]  Soumojit Kumar,et al.  A profit maximizing mathematical model for pricing and selecting optimal product line , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[16]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  Coordination of the closed-loop supply chain for product line design with consideration of remanufactured products , 2016 .

[17]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  The Probit Choice Model under Sequential Search with an Application to Online Retailing , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Zizhuo Wang,et al.  Consumer Choice Models with Endogenous Network Effects , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Milan Martic,et al.  An approach to competitive product line design using conjoint data , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  ESTIMATION OF VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS USING MIXED LOGIT MODELS , 2005 .

[21]  Cornelia Schön,et al.  On the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem with Price Discrimination , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Huseyin Topaloglu,et al.  Robust Assortment Optimization in Revenue Management Under the Multinomial Logit Choice Model , 2012, Oper. Res..

[23]  Candace A. Yano,et al.  Product line selection and pricing under a share-of-surplus choice model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Gerard Debreu,et al.  A Social Equilibrium Existence Theorem* , 1952, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Kuo-Sheng Cheng,et al.  Acoustic monitoring of daily activities based on hidden Markov model and multidimensional scaling , 2015 .

[26]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Product Line Design , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  A. Yesim Orhun,et al.  Optimal Product Line Design When Consumers Exhibit Choice Set-Dependent Preferences , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[28]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  Optimal product positioning with consideration of negative utility effect on consumer choice rule , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  Jeffrey D. Camm,et al.  Conjoint Optimization: An Exact Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Share-of-Choice Problem , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Chung-Piaw Teo,et al.  Persistency Model and Its Applications in Choice Modeling , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Paul Lacourbe,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A model of product line design and introduction sequence with reservation utility , 2012 .

[32]  Xiaobo Li,et al.  Distributionally Robust Mixed Integer Linear Programs: Persistency Models with Applications , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Chao Ou-Yang,et al.  Applying a risk assessment approach for cost analysis and decision-making: a case study for a basic design engineering project , 2017 .

[34]  Shan-Huo Chen,et al.  A Model and Algorithm of Fuzzy Product Positioning , 1999, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Jie Zhang,et al.  An Integrated Choice Model Incorporating Alternative Mechanisms for Consumers' Reactions to In-Store Display and Feature Advertising , 2006 .

[36]  Hongmin Li,et al.  Pricing Multiple Products with the Multinomial Logit and Nested Logit Models: Concavity and Implications , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[37]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  Robust Product Line Design , 2017, Oper. Res..

[38]  Nan Xia,et al.  Standard vs. Custom Products: Variety, Lead Time, and Price Competition , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[39]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Multi‐Product Quality Competition: Impact of Resource Constraints , 2013 .