Scripting For Collaborative Search Computer-Supported Classroom Activities

Searching online is one of the most powerful resources today’s students have for accessing information. Searching in groups is a daily practice across multiple contexts; however, the tools we use for searching online do not enable collaborative practices and traditional search models consider a single user navigating online in solitary. This paper presents a three level conceptual model, called the Collaborative Search Procedural Model, which enables the implementation of collaborative search classroom activities based on multi-user collaborative search scripts. A software solution, CollSearch, which follows the Collaborative Search Procedural Model and offers a unified tool to enable collaborative searching computer-supported classroom activities, is also presented. Empirical evaluation of the tool with high school students as part of an English as a second language course shows that students’ outcomes improve when compared to non-scripted group search. Results show that by following the Collaborative Search Procedural Model students better appropriate the work they build together with their group. The OECD has highlighted the importance of collaborative work by the fact that PISA 2015 will assess collaborative problem solving; collaborative search is a fertile field for fostering better group work interactions. This paper shows that new tools that enable collaborative work dynamics in searching for information must be developed in order to address the educational challenges that today’s students are facing.

[1]  P. Dillenbourg What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[2]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[4]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[5]  Hugo Fuks,et al.  Coordination of collaborative activities: a framework for the definition of tasks interdependencies , 2001, Proceedings Seventh International Workshop on Groupware. CRIWG 2001.

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Making cooperative learning work , 1999 .

[7]  Jette Hyldegård,et al.  Beyond the search process - Exploring group members' information behavior in context , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  CoSearch: a system for co-located collaborative web search , 2008, CHI.

[9]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Dynamic Grouping in Collaborative Learning Supported by Wireless Handhelds , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[10]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Browsing is a collaborative process , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  Meredith Ringel Morris Collaborating Alone and Together: Investigating Persistent and Multi-User Web Search Activities , 2007 .

[12]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  A survey of collaborative web search practices , 2008, CHI.

[13]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[14]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Technology as small group face-to-face Collaborative Scaffolding , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Co-located Collaborative Learning Video Game with Single Display Groupware Co-located Collaborative Learning Video Game with Single Display Groupware , 2022 .

[17]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Information Search Process , 2005 .

[18]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  TeamSearch: comparing techniques for co-present collaborative search of digital media , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[19]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Jochen Rick,et al.  Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games , 2006 .

[21]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[22]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Importance of Awareness for Team Cognition in Distributed Collaboration , 2001 .

[23]  Jamshid Beheshti,et al.  Gender differences in collaborative Web searching behavior: an elementary school study , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Co-located collaborative web search: understanding status quo practices , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[25]  Justine Alsop-Cotton Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century , 2009 .

[26]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .