Approaching Semantically-Mediated Acoustic Data

Our primary hypothesis is that it should be possible to enrich data fusion by semantic processing, with wide potential application. In order to achieve our aim we need to represent the semantic data and enable reasoning about it in a framework that can be aligned with data fusion. Ontologies are most suited to this task as they allow for appropriate representation of data structure; some approaches include probabilistic representation. These can be aligned with data fusion approaches, such as Bayesian, which can fuse by including estimates of uncertainty. We shall describe our initial approaches towards establishing our hypothesis. We shall survey the enabling technologies, showing how they can contribute to our goal. We shall describe our selection of application data which derives from an acoustic sensor (military) scenario. We shall show how feature subset selection can reduce information-redundancy and improve efficiency in these domains, prior to fusion to enhance performance further. We shall explore the semantic attributes and the representations that can be deployed for enrichment purposes, showing how ontologies can be used in this context. In these respects we are aiming to show how we can approach enrichment of data fusion by semantic technologies, how this can capitalise on the current stock of techniques, and illustrate the potential benefits associated with this new approach.

[1]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[2]  Philippe Smets,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Robert I. Damper,et al.  Band Selection for Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Mutual Information , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  The Military Knowledge Information Fusion Via Semantic Web Technologies , 2006 .

[5]  Gene T. Whipps,et al.  Multiple target tracking and classification improvement using data fusion at node level using acoustic signals , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Tien Pham,et al.  Algorithm for classifying multiple targets using acoustic signatures , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[8]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Level 5: user refinement to aid the fusion process , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[9]  D. J. Barrett,et al.  Model-Data Fusion , 2003 .

[10]  Paul O'Brien,et al.  Domain Ontology Management Environment , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  D. E. Lake,et al.  Tracking fundamental frequency for synchronous mechanical diagnostic signal processing , 1998, Ninth IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing (Cat. No.98TH8381).

[12]  Douglas E. Lake,et al.  Harmonic phase coupling for battlefield acoustic target identification , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[13]  Janusz Zalewski,et al.  Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , 1996 .

[14]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.