Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with elevated PSA levels and negative tumor prostate biopsies underwent a MR-guided prostate biopsy in a 1.5-T scanner in the supine position. After localization of suspected tumor areas using an endorectal coil and two body-phased array coils, the biopsy device was positioned without any repositioning of the patient. The biopsy device consisted of a mount, a ball joint, a positioning stage and an insertion stage with a needle guide, which was filled with a MR-visible fluid to control positioning of the needle using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence (TrueFISP) and a high-resolution turbo spin echo (T2-TSE) sequence. Core biopsies were taken manually in the magnet. The biopsy needle could be correctly positioned in all cases. Suspected lesions with a diameter ≥10 mm could be successfully punctured. Four to nine (mean =6) biopsies were taken per patient. In 14 patients, prostate cancer was confirmed at histology. Twenty-four biopsies positive for cancer were performed in 14 patients. A correct correlation was found between the site of biopsy and histology. MR-guided prostate biopsy can be effective in increasing primary positive tumor biopsy results in patients with a history of negative tumor TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.

[1]  P H Bland,et al.  Prostate cancer: correlation of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination. , 1991, Radiology.

[2]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[3]  S. Haukaas,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate , 2001, Current opinion in urology.

[4]  Update on transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. , 2000, Molecular urology.

[5]  W. Catalona A nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session: Editorial comment , 2003 .

[6]  M. Deimling,et al.  Combination of signal intensity measurements of lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate with MRI and serum PSA level for differentiating benign disease from prostate cancer , 2000, European Radiology.

[7]  S. Zangos,et al.  MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results , 2004, European Radiology.

[8]  K. Badani,et al.  Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostastic biopsy: a pilot study. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[9]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  A. D'Amico,et al.  MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5 T MRI scanner , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  S B Malkowicz,et al.  Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging identifies locally advanced prostate cancer in select patients with clinically localized disease. , 1998, Urology.

[13]  William J Catalona,et al.  Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Wolfhard Semmler,et al.  Simple models improve the discrimination of prostate cancers from the peripheral gland by T1-weighted dynamic MRI , 2004, European Radiology.

[15]  M. Kattan,et al.  A nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[16]  W. Ellis,et al.  The significance of isoechoic prostatic carcinoma. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[17]  N Hata,et al.  Feasibility of transperineal prostate biopsy under interventional magnetic resonance guidance. , 2000, Urology.

[18]  D. Beyersdorff,et al.  MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. , 2005, Radiology.

[19]  A. Gelabert-Más,et al.  The value of endorectal MRI in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2003, European urology.

[20]  F W MULSOW,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality , 2019, Health at a Glance: Europe.

[21]  K. Taari,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[22]  M. Resnick,et al.  Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality , 2000, The Prostate.

[23]  W. Catalona,et al.  Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[24]  John T. Wei,et al.  The influence of prostate size on cancer detection. , 1995, Urology.

[25]  J. Vilanova,et al.  The value of endorectal MR imaging to predict positive biopsies in clinically intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients , 2001, European Radiology.

[26]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. , 2000, The Journal of urology.