An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition

[1]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[2]  A. G. Goldstein.  Race-related variation of facial features: Anthropometric data I , 1979 .

[3]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[4]  Sheri L. Johnson.  Cross-Racial Identification Errors in Criminal Cases , 1984 .

[5]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[6]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  R. Bruyer,et al.  Features of laterally displayed faces: saliency or top-down processing? , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[8]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[9]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces. , 1996 .

[11]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  The influence of nationality on the accuracy of face and voice recognition. , 1998, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  G. Hole,et al.  Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.

[14]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[15]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[16]  P. Schyns,et al.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Role of Featural and Configural Information in Familiar and Unfamiliar Face Recognition , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[20]  Michael L. Peterson,et al.  Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes (335-355) , 2006 .

[21]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Expert face processing: specialisation and constraints , 2003 .

[22]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  What Are the Routes to Face Recognition , 2003 .

[23]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[24]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[25]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[26]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2006 .

[27]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.