Nonlinear multi-objective optimization model for a biomass direct-fired power generation supply chain using a case study in China

Using renewable resources to generate electricity is becoming increasingly common all over the world. As the largest energy consumer in the world, China has established many biomass direct-fired power plants in recent years. However, most of these power plants would not survive without government subsidies because of the high cost of fuel. This study focuses on the fuel supply chain of biomass direct-fired power generation, including the collection, transportation, processing, and storage of fuel; the study presents a nonlinear multi-objective optimization model. The purpose of this work is to determine the optimal quantity of electricity generation, as well as the ideal blending ratio, acquisition quantity and price of each kind of fuel so as to maximize the profit margins of biomass power plants and provide the most protection possible of social welfare considering environmental factors. The model we present was applied in a biomass direct-fired power plant in Heilongjiang Province in Northeast China; the subject plant was chosen from 13 biomass power plants that were investigated. Based on the case study, we obtained values for the optimal results and compared them with the actual situation. The optimal results confirmed that under the existing technical conditions, the overall benefit of biomass power generation leaves significant room for improvement, mainly by means of designing a more reasonable fuel supply mode. Finally, a sensitivity analysis showed that the best and most integrated efficiency in biomass power generation was achieved when the biomass electricity on-grid price was approximately 0.65 Yuan/kWh.

[1]  Jicheng Liu,et al.  Present situation, problems and solutions of China׳s biomass power generation industry , 2014 .

[2]  Geraldo Lúcio Tiago Filho,et al.  Electricity generation from biogas of anaerobic wastewater treatment plants in Brazil: an assessment of feasibility and potential , 2016 .

[3]  Ian McCallum,et al.  Optimal location of lignocellulosic ethanol refineries with polygeneration in Sweden. , 2010 .

[4]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Change and Renewable Energy , 2005 .

[5]  D. Wiley,et al.  The impact of biomass quality and quantity on the performance and economics of co-firing plants with and without CO2 capture , 2014 .

[6]  T. Sowlati,et al.  Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives – A review of literature , 2014 .

[7]  Fredrik Haglind,et al.  Optimization of a flexible multi-generation system based on wood chip gasification and methanol production , 2017 .

[8]  Amit Kumar,et al.  A conceptual comparison of bioenergy options for using mountain pine beetle infested wood in Western Canada. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[9]  Ang Li,et al.  A multi-objective sustainable location model for biomass power plants: Case of China , 2016 .

[10]  P. Zambelli,et al.  Matching socio-economic and environmental efficiency of wood- residues energy chain: a partial equilibrium model for a case study in Alpine area , 2014 .

[11]  Fengqi You,et al.  Life Cycle Optimization of Biomass-to-Liquid Supply Chains with Distributed–Centralized Processing Networks , 2011 .

[12]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Optimal grid design and logistic planning for wind and biomass based renewable electricity supply chains under uncertainties , 2014 .

[13]  Sung-Kwan Joo,et al.  Social Welfare Maximization in Transmission Enhancement Considering Network Congestion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Leonardo Tognotti,et al.  High-temperature rapid devolatilization of biomasses with varying degrees of torrefaction , 2014 .

[15]  Ricki G. Ingalls,et al.  Biomass supply chain design and analysis: Basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future , 2013 .

[16]  Yuan Chang,et al.  Biomass direct-fired power generation system in China: An integrated energy, GHG emissions, and economic evaluation for Salix , 2015 .

[17]  A. J. Toft,et al.  A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion , 2002 .

[18]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[19]  Hans Ivar Skjelbred,et al.  Linear mixed-integer models for biomass supply chains with transport, storage and processing , 2010 .

[20]  Mikael Rönnqvist,et al.  Tactical supply chain planning for a forest biomass power plant under supply uncertainty , 2014 .

[21]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Total footprints-based multi-criteria optimisation of regional biomass energy supply chains , 2012 .

[22]  Sebnem Yilmaz Balaman Investment planning and strategic management of sustainable systems for clean power generation: An ε-constraint based multi objective modelling approach , 2016 .

[23]  Edson L. Meyer,et al.  Pre-processing of sugarcane bagasse for gasification in a downdraft biomass gasifier system: A comprehensive review , 2016 .

[24]  Alessandro Tugnoli,et al.  A two-tier approach to the optimization of a biomass supply chain for pyrolysis processes , 2016 .

[25]  Wlodzimierz Blasiak,et al.  Modern Technologies of Biomass Combustion and Pre-treatment for more Efficient Electricity Production: Review and Case Analysis , 2013 .

[26]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Biopower generation from mountain pine infested wood in Canada: An economical opportunity for greenhouse gas mitigation , 2008 .

[27]  Luis Puigjaner,et al.  Design of regional and sustainable bio-based networks for electricity generation using a multi-objective MILP approach , 2012 .

[28]  Tosin Onabanjo Somorin,et al.  Faecal-wood biomass co-combustion and ash composition analysis , 2017, Fuel.

[29]  F. You,et al.  Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input–output analysis , 2012 .

[30]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Current and future technical, economic and environmental feasibility of maize and wheat residues supply for biomass energy application : Illustrated for South Africa , 2016 .