Monetizing Customer Load Data for an Energy Retailer: A Cooperative Game Approach

When energy customers schedule loads ahead of time, this information, if acquired by their energy retailer, can improve the retailer’s load forecasts. Better forecasts lead to wholesale purchase decisions that are likely to result in lower energy imbalance costs, and thus higher profits for the retailer. Therefore, this paper monetizes the value of the customer schedulable load data by quantifying the retailer’s profit gain from adjusting the wholesale purchase based on such data. Using a cooperative game theoretic approach, the retailer translates their increased profit in expectation into the value of cooperation, and redistributes a portion of it among the customers as monetary incentives for them to continue providing their load data. Through case studies, this paper demonstrates the significance of the additional profit for the retailer from using the proposed framework, and evaluates the long-term monetary benefits to the customers based on different payoff allocation methods.

[1]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Towards Data Markets in Renewable Energy Forecasting , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[2]  A. Conejo,et al.  A Bilevel Stochastic Programming Approach for Retailer Futures Market Trading , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  P. Pinson,et al.  Trading Wind Generation From Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasts of Wind Power , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi,et al.  Information Sale and Competition , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Hermann Scheer,et al.  Energy Autonomy: The Economic, Social and Technological Case for Renewable Energy , 2006 .

[6]  P. Pinson,et al.  The ethical smart grid: Enabling a fruitful and long-lasting relationship between utilities and customers , 2020, Energy Policy.

[7]  K. Littlewood. Special Issue Papers: Forecasting and control of passenger bookings , 2005 .

[8]  Farhad Farokhi,et al.  Review of results on smart‐meter privacy by data manipulation, demand shaping, and load scheduling , 2020, IET Smart Grid.

[9]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Too Much Data: Prices and Inefficiencies in Data Markets , 2019, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics.

[10]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Integrating Renewables in Electricity Markets: Operational Problems , 2013 .

[11]  E. Kohlberg On the Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game , 1971 .

[12]  Benjamin Sovacool,et al.  Electricity market design for the prosumer era , 2016, Nature Energy.

[13]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[14]  D. Bergemann,et al.  Markets for Information: An Introduction , 2018, Annual Review of Economics.

[15]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  A Marketplace for Data: An Algorithmic Solution , 2018, EC.

[16]  John R. Birge,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic programming (2nd edition), Springer verlag, New York , 2011 .

[17]  Gabriela Hug,et al.  Enabling inter-area reserve exchange through stable benefit allocation mechanisms , 2019, Omega.