Phylogenetic relatedness as a tool in restoration ecology: a meta-analysis

Biotic interactions assembling plant communities can be positive (facilitation) or negative (competition) and operate simultaneously. Facilitative interactions and posterior competition are among the mechanisms triggering succession, thus representing a good scenario for ecological restoration. As distantly related species tend to have different phenotypes, and therefore different ecological requirements, they can coexist, maximizing facilitation and minimizing competition. We suggest including phylogenetic relatedness together with phenotypic information as a predictor for the net effects of the balance between facilitation and competition in nurse-based restoration experiments. We quantify, by means of a Bayesian meta-analysis of nurse-based restoration experiments performed worldwide, the importance of phylogenetic relatedness and life-form disparity in the survival, growth and density of facilitated plants. We find that the more similar the life forms of neighbouring plants are the greater the positive effect of phylogenetic distance is on survival and density. This result suggests that other characteristics beyond life form are also contained in the phylogeny, and the larger the phylogenetic distance, the less is the niche overlap, and therefore the less is the competition. As a general rule, we can maximize the success of the nurse-based practices by increasing life-form disparity and phylogenetic distances between the neighbour and the facilitated plant.

[1]  Alfonso Valiente-Banuet,et al.  The relative contribution of abundance and phylogeny to the structure of plant facilitation networks , 2011 .

[2]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity--ecosystem-function relationships. , 2011, Ecology.

[3]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[4]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models for phylogenetic analyses of community structure , 2011 .

[5]  P. Ruiz‐Benito,et al.  Disentangling the relative importance of climate, size and competition on tree growth in Iberian forests: implications for forest management under global change , 2011 .

[6]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Neighborhood phylodiversity affects plant performance. , 2010, Ecology.

[7]  David L. Erickson,et al.  Trait similarity, shared ancestry and the structure of neighbourhood interactions in a subtropical wet forest: implications for community assembly. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[8]  A. Clewell,et al.  Bridging Restoration Science and Practice: Results and Analysis of a Survey from the 2009 Society for Ecological Restoration International Meeting , 2010 .

[9]  P. Jordano,et al.  The phylogenetic structure of plant facilitation networks changes with competition , 2010 .

[10]  John-Arvid Grytnes,et al.  Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[11]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[12]  John M. Briggs,et al.  Regeneration niche differentiates functional strategies of desert woody plant species , 2010, Oecologia.

[13]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Species-specificity of nurse plants for the establishment, survivorship, and growth of a columnar cactus. , 2010, American journal of botany.

[14]  Rasmus Astrup,et al.  Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species. , 2010 .

[15]  J. Hadfield,et al.  General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi‐trait models for continuous and categorical characters , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[16]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models , 2010 .

[17]  Erik Postma,et al.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[18]  L. Gómez‐Aparicio,et al.  The role of plant interactions in the restoration of degraded ecosystems: a meta‐analysis across life‐forms and ecosystems , 2009 .

[19]  Lorena Gómez Aparicio The role of plant interactions in the restoration of degraded ecosystems: a meta-analysis across life-forms and ecosystems , 2009 .

[20]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Phylogenetic signatures of facilitation and competition in successional communities , 2009 .

[21]  P. Rey,et al.  Community-level restoration profiles in Mediterranean vegetation: nurse-based vs. traditional reforestation , 2009 .

[22]  Anna Traveset,et al.  A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[23]  C. Canham,et al.  Above‐ versus below‐ground competitive effects and responses of a guild of temperate tree species , 2009 .

[24]  J. Alcántara,et al.  Assessing the long-term contribution of nurse plants to restoration of Mediterranean forests through Markovian models , 2008 .

[25]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[26]  Katherine N. Suding,et al.  Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  J. Losos Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[28]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Phylogenetic Community Structure and Trait Evolution , 2022 .

[29]  Alfonso Valiente-Banuet,et al.  Temporal shifts from facilitation to competition occur between closely related taxa , 2008 .

[30]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Facilitation can increase the phylogenetic diversity of plant communities. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[31]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems , 2007, Nature.

[32]  Joel Dudley,et al.  TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms , 2006, Bioinform..

[33]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Modern Quaternary plant lineages promote diversity through facilitation of ancient Tertiary lineages , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Multi-model analysis of tree competition along environmental gradients in southern New England forests. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  Francisco M. Padilla,et al.  The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments , 2006 .

[36]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  J. H. Burns,et al.  A Comparison of Plastic Responses to Competition by Invasive and Non-invasive Congeners in the Commelinaceae , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[38]  Nico Koedam,et al.  Remote Sensing and Ethnobotanical Assessment of the Mangrove Forest Changes in the Navachiste-San Ignacio-Macapule Lagoon Complex, Sinaloa, Mexico , 2005 .

[39]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Implications of current ecological thinking for biodiversity conservation: A review of the salient issues , 2005 .

[40]  Regino Zamora,et al.  APPLYING PLANT FACILITATION TO FOREST RESTORATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF SHRUBS AS NURSE PLANTS , 2004 .

[41]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  A NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS OF TREE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL IN A HURRICANE‐DRIVEN TROPICAL FOREST , 2004 .

[42]  J. Hódar,et al.  Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration in Mediterranean ecosystems: a meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants , 2004 .

[43]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  J. Bruno,et al.  Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory , 2003 .

[45]  R. Zamora,et al.  Use of Shrubs as Nurse Plants: A New Technique for Reforestation in Mediterranean Mountains , 2002 .

[46]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives , 2002 .

[47]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[49]  R. Callaway Are positive interactions species-specific ? , 1998 .

[50]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities , 1997 .

[51]  R. Yeaton,et al.  Organization of Vegetation Mosaics in the Acacia Schaffneri-Opuntia Streptacantha Association, Southern Chihuahuan Desert, Mexico , 1986 .

[52]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  The theory of limiting similarity , 1983 .

[53]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[54]  J. Runyan The role of nurses. , 1972, JAMA.