Measurement of local chromatin compaction by spectral precision distance microscopy

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) offers an appropriate technique to specifically label any given chromatin region by multi spectrally labeled, specific DNA probes. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy, quantitative measurements on the spatial distribution of labeling sites can be performed in 3D conserved cell nuclei. Recently, 'Spectral Precision Distance Microscopy' has been developed that allows 3D distance measurements between point-like fluorescence objects of different spectral signatures far beyond the diffraction limited resolution. In a well characterized and sequenced DNA region, the Prader- Willi/Angelman region q11-13 on chromosome 15, geometric distances between the fluorescence intensity bary centers of four different 'point-like' labeling sites were measured. More than 300 cell nuclei were evaluated with a 3D resolution equivalent better than 100 nm. The geometric bary center distances in nanometers were compared with the genomic bary center distance in kilobases (kb). A direct correlation, for instance linear correlation between geometric and genomic distances was not observed. From the measured values, a local compaction factor for the high order chromatin folding in the analyzed genome region was calculated. Along the 1000 kb chromatin segment analyzed, which spans nearly the compete Prader-Willi/Angelman region, different compaction factors were found. The compaction factor 40 typical for a straight 30 nm chromatin fiber was not observed. This shows that chromatin folding and compaction in intact nuclei may be more complex. With SPDM, however, a microscopical technique is available that can sensitively analyze chromatin organization in the 100 nm range in 3D conserved cell nuclei.

[1]  Jürgen Köhler,et al.  Far-field fluorescence microscopy beyond the diffraction limit , 1999 .

[2]  C Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture. , 2000, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[3]  M. Nöthen,et al.  Sporadic imprinting defects in Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome: implications for imprint-switch models, genetic counseling, and prenatal diagnosis. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  A Klug,et al.  The nucleosome. , 1981, Scientific American.

[5]  Cremer,et al.  High‐precision distance measurements and volume‐conserving segmentation of objects near and below the resolution limit in three‐dimensional confocal fluorescence microscopy , 1998 .

[6]  K. Augsten,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. : J.B. Pawley (Editor), Plenum Press, New York, 1990, xiii + 232 pp., ISBN 0-306-43538-1. , 1992 .

[7]  S W Hell,et al.  Far‐field fluorescence microscopy with three‐dimensional resolution in the 100‐nm range , 1997, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  Frank-Martin Haar,et al.  Non-Enzymatic, Low Temperature Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Human Chromosomes with a Repetitive α-Satellite Probe , 1997, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of biosciences.

[9]  Steffen Lindek,et al.  Fundamental reduction of the observation volume in far-field light microscopy by detection orthogonal to the illumination axis: confocal theta microscopy , 1994 .

[10]  S. Hell,et al.  Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  T. Cremer,et al.  Quantitative motion analysis of subchromosomal foci in living cells using four-dimensional microscopy. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[12]  D H Burns,et al.  Strategies for attaining superresolution using spectroscopic data as constraints. , 1985, Applied optics.

[13]  A. Stewart Genes V , 1994 .

[14]  A. Klug,et al.  Structure of the nucleosome core particle at 7 Å resolution , 1984, Nature.

[15]  Christoph Cremer,et al.  Confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy : In situ determination of the confocal point-spread function and the chromatic shifts in intact cell nuclei , 1999 .

[16]  K M Hahn,et al.  Dynamic elastic behavior of alpha-satellite DNA domains visualized in situ in living human cells , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  C Cremer,et al.  A Dual-Laser, Spatially Modulated Illumination Fluorescence Microscope , 1999 .

[18]  Christoph Cremer,et al.  Non-encymatic, low temperature in situ hybridization of metaphase chromosomes for magnetic labelling and sorting , 1995 .

[19]  Christoph Cremer,et al.  Spektrale Präzisionsdistanzmikroskopie in der Genomforschung , 1999 .

[20]  R Eils,et al.  Compartmentalization of interphase chromosomes observed in simulation and experiment. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  F. Pinaud,et al.  Ultrahigh-resolution multicolor colocalization of single fluorescent probes. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  Subresolution axial distance measurements in far-field fluorescence microscopy with precision of 1 nanometer. , 2000 .

[23]  G. Felsenfeld,et al.  Nucleosome structure. , 1980, Annual review of biochemistry.

[24]  Bernhard Horsthemke,et al.  Inherited microdeletions in the Angelman and Prader–Willi syndromes define an imprinting centre on human chromosome 15 , 1995, Nature Genetics.

[25]  F. Thoma,et al.  Core particle, fiber, and transcriptionally active chromatin structure. , 1986, Annual review of cell biology.

[26]  D. Agard,et al.  A three-dimensional approach to mitotic chromosome structure: evidence for a complex hierarchical organization , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[28]  P. Lichter,et al.  Chromosome analysis by non-isotopic in situ hybridization. , 1992 .