Analytical strategies for controlling polysorbate-based nanomicelles in fruit juice

This study focused on the detection and quantification of organic micelle-type nanoparticles (NPs) with polysorbate components (polysorbate 20 and polysorbate 80) in their micelle shells that could be used to load biologically active compounds into fruit juice. Several advanced analytical techniques were applied in the stepwise method development strategy used. In the first phase, a system consisting of ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography employing a size exclusion column coupled with an evaporative light scattering detector (UHPLC-SEC-ELSD) was used for the fractionation of micelle assemblies from other, lower molecular weight sample components. The limit of detection (LoD) of these polysorbate micelles in spiked apple juice was 500 μg mL−1. After this screening step, mass spectrometric (MS) detection was utilized to confirm the presence of polysorbates in the detected micelles. Two alternative MS techniques were tested: (i) ambient high-resolution mass spectrometry employing a direct analysis in real time ion source coupled with an Orbitrap MS analyzer (DART-Orbitrap MS) enabled fast and simple detection of the polysorbates present in the samples, with a lowest calibration level (LCL) of 1000 μg mL−1; (ii) ultrahigh-performance reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRTOF-MS) provided highly selective and sensitive detection and quantification of polysorbates with an LCL of 0.5 μg mL−1.

[1]  P. Rao Who Food Additives Series , 1973 .

[2]  M. Zobel Toxicological evaluation of some food additives including anticaking agents, antimicrobials, antioxidants, emulsifiers and thickening agents. , 1974, FAO nutrition meetings report series.

[3]  J. Verweij,et al.  Determination of the docetaxel vehicle, polysorbate 80, in patient samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[4]  Y. Kao,et al.  Analysis Methods of Polysorbate 20: A New Method to Assess the Stability of Polysorbate 20 and Established Methods That May Overlook Degraded Polysorbate 20 , 2002, Pharmaceutical Research.

[5]  R. Reed,et al.  Polysorbate 80 UV/vis spectral and chromatographic characteristics--defining boundary conditions for use of the surfactant in dissolution analysis. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[6]  G. Morlock,et al.  New coupling of planar chromatography with direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry. , 2007 .

[7]  H. Bouwmeester,et al.  A review of analytical methods for the identification and characterization of nano delivery systems in food. , 2008, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[8]  A. Boxall,et al.  Detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in food and the environment , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[9]  B. Kerwin Polysorbates 20 and 80 used in the formulation of protein biotherapeutics: structure and degradation pathways. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[10]  Q. Chaudhry,et al.  Applications and implications of nanotechnologies for the food sector , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[11]  Gérard Rivière European and international standardisation progress in the field of engineered nanoparticles , 2009, Inhalation toxicology.

[12]  G. Lowry,et al.  Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[13]  J. Fekete,et al.  Fast and sensitive determination of Polysorbate 80 in solutions containing proteins. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[14]  T. Cajka,et al.  Ambient mass spectrometry employing a DART ion source for metabolomic fingerprinting/profiling: a powerful tool for beer origin recognition , 2011, Metabolomics.

[15]  Q. Chaudhry,et al.  Chapter 5:Nanotechnology Applications for Food Ingredients, Additives and Supplements , 2010 .

[16]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  Chapter 1:Nanotechnologies in the Food Arena: New Opportunities, New Questions, New Concerns , 2010 .

[17]  Y. Picó,et al.  Determining nanomaterials in food , 2011 .

[18]  T. Cajka,et al.  Challenging applications offered by direct analysis in real time (DART) in food-quality and safety analysis , 2011 .

[19]  G. Allmaier,et al.  Identification and characterization of organic nanoparticles in food , 2011 .

[20]  A. Pappenberger,et al.  Degradation of polysorbates 20 and 80: studies on thermal autoxidation and hydrolysis. , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[21]  F. Rossi,et al.  Measuring nanoparticles size distribution in food and consumer products: a review , 2012, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[22]  S. Weigel,et al.  Characterisation and quantification of liposome-type nanoparticles in a beverage matrix using hydrodynamic chromatography and MALDI–TOF mass spectrometry , 2013, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[23]  Y. Mugnier,et al.  Polymer encapsulation of inorganic nanoparticles for biomedical applications. , 2013, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[24]  Haifang Wang,et al.  Progress in the characterization and safety evaluation of engineered inorganic nanomaterials in food. , 2013, Nanomedicine.

[25]  G. Bartosz,et al.  Pitfalls of assays devoted to evaluation of oxidative stress induced by inorganic nanoparticles. , 2013, Talanta.

[26]  J. Choy,et al.  Toxicity evaluation of inorganic nanoparticles: considerations and challenges , 2013, Molecular & Cellular Toxicology.

[27]  B. Gale,et al.  Biased cyclical electrical field flow fractionation for separation of sub 50 nm particles. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.