Feedback as dialogue: exploring the links between formative assessment and social software in distance learning

The paper explores the relationship between formative assessment and social software. Formative assessment practices though beneficial for student learning become marginalised and constrained in open and distance learning environments in higher education. Feedback is a key factor in formative assessment and learners can benefit from the deployment of emerging technologies and the opportunities for participation and dialogue afforded by social software. This paper explores and proposes a conceptual framework for this relationship. The claim is that the social dimensions of emerging technologies – specifically, blogs and wikis – allow for formative assessment practices to be re‐invented or at the very least facilitated by essentially participative and student‐focussed interventions. A comparison of these technologies against formative assessment mechanisms identifies the types of processes that these new tools might best support to encourage effective feedback approaches that both empower the learner and enhance their learning experience.

[1]  Iraklis Paraskakis,et al.  Using social software for teaching and learning in higher education , 2009 .

[2]  C. Rust The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning , 2002 .

[3]  D. Sadler Evaluation and the Improvement of Academic Learning , 1983 .

[4]  Stylianos Hatzipanagos,et al.  HOT and Flaming Spirals: Learning and Empathic Interfaces in Discussion Forum Text-based Dialogues , 2006 .

[5]  Alexander E. Voiskounsky Telelogue Conversations , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Lisa K Kervin,et al.  Blogs as a social networking tool to build community , 2009 .

[7]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for learning , 2003, Practical Pedagogy.

[8]  Michael Hammond Blogging within Formal and informal learning contexts : where are the opportunities and constraints? , 2006 .

[9]  Mantz Yorke Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice , 2003 .

[10]  G. Gibbs,et al.  Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning , 2005 .

[11]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  Destructive Creativity on the Social Web: Learning through Wikis in Higher Education , 2009 .

[12]  Stylianos Hatzipanagos,et al.  Handbook of Research on Social Software and Developing Community Ontologies , 2009 .

[13]  Kindler-Rohrborn,et al.  In press , 1994, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[14]  Linda Leach,et al.  Assessment and Empowerment: Some critical questions , 2001 .

[15]  Charles Crook,et al.  Web 2.0 technologies for learning: the current landscape – opportunities, challenges and tensions , 2008 .

[16]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[17]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[18]  D. McConnell,et al.  Examining a collaborative assessment process in networked lifelong learning , 1999, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[19]  D. McConnell E-Learning Groups and Communities , 2006 .

[20]  David A. Huffaker,et al.  Gender, Identity, and Language Use in Teenage Blogs , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Stephen Bostock,et al.  Motivation and electronic assessment , 2004 .

[22]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Higher education evolution: Individual freedom afforded by educational social software , 2006 .

[23]  Lara C. Ducate1,et al.  Adventures in the blogosphere: from blog readers to blog writers , 2008 .

[24]  Sarah Guri-Rosenblit,et al.  ‘Distance education’ and ‘e-learning’: Not the same thing , 2005 .

[25]  Jim Ridgway,et al.  Literature review of e-assessment. , 2004 .

[26]  Maarten De Laat,et al.  'Disruptive technologies', 'pedagogical innovation': What's new Findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Rachel Alley Wikis: Tools for Information Work and Collaboration , 2008 .

[28]  Robin Yeates Wikis: Tools for Information Work and Collaboration , 2007, Program.

[29]  Bo Leuf,et al.  The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web , 2001 .

[30]  Alan Skelton,et al.  Getting the Message Across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback , 2001 .

[31]  D. Prozesky,et al.  Assessment of Learning , 2020, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education.

[32]  Richard Trembath The isle is full of noises , 1991 .

[33]  Robin Farabaugh,et al.  ‘The Isle is Full of Noises’: Using Wiki Software to Establish a Discourse Community in a Shakespeare Classroom , 2007 .

[34]  Carolyn R. Miller Genre as social action , 1984 .

[35]  Stephen Downes E-learning 2.0 , 2005, ELERN.

[36]  Joanna Bull,et al.  A Blueprint for Computer-Assisted Assessment , 2003 .

[37]  J. Pryor,et al.  Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom , 1998 .

[38]  Jeff Utecht Blogs Aren't the Enemy; How Blogs Enhance Learning. Voices from Techlearning.com. , 2007 .

[39]  Effie Maclellan,et al.  Assessment for Learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students , 2001 .

[40]  Routledge Learning, media and technology , 2005 .

[41]  Clay Shirky A Group is Its Own Worst Enemy , 2005 .

[42]  A. de Moor,et al.  An argumentation analysis of weblog conversations , 2000 .

[43]  Patrick Smith,et al.  The Uses of Learning Outcomes , 2003 .

[44]  Lewis Elton,et al.  Professional development in higher education , 2002 .

[45]  Gill Kirkup,et al.  Supporting Student Blogging in Higher Education , 2009 .

[46]  Henry A. Giroux Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education , 1991 .

[47]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[48]  Werner Beuschel,et al.  Weblogs in Higher Education , 2009 .

[49]  Alison Bone Evaluating the impact of formative assessment , 2005 .

[50]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Reflections from the Introduction of Blogs and RSS Feeds into a Preservice Instructional Technology Course , 2006 .