Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences.

The main features of domino accidents in process/storage plants and in the transportation of hazardous materials were studied through an analysis of 225 accidents involving this effect. Data on these accidents, which occurred after 1961, were taken from several sources. Aspects analyzed included the accident scenario, the type of accident, the materials involved, the causes and consequences and the most common accident sequences. The analysis showed that the most frequent causes are external events (31%) and mechanical failure (29%). Storage areas (35%) and process plants (28%) are by far the most common settings for domino accidents. Eighty-nine per cent of the accidents involved flammable materials, the most frequent of which was LPG. The domino effect sequences were analyzed using relative probability event trees. The most frequent sequences were explosion→fire (27.6%), fire→explosion (27.5%) and fire→fire (17.8%).

[1]  E Planas,et al.  A survey of accidents occurring during the transport of hazardous substances by road and rail. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  Faisal Khan,et al.  An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect (chain of accidents) in a typical cluster of industries , 2001 .

[3]  C T Kiranoudis,et al.  Statistical analysis of domino chemical accidents. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Prevention of domino effect: from active and passive strategies to inherently safer design. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  Wout Dullaert,et al.  Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim , 2005 .

[6]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Jet fires and the domino effect , 2008 .

[7]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Wout Dullaert,et al.  The use of current risk analysis tools evaluated towards preventing external domino accidents , 2005 .

[9]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Historical analysis of accidents in chemical plants and in the transportation of hazardous materials , 1995 .

[10]  Mercedes Gómez Mares.  Estudio experimental y modelización matemática de dardos de fuego , 2009 .

[11]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area , 2009 .

[12]  Frank P. Lees,et al.  Loss Prevention In The Process Industries , 1980 .

[13]  Martin Crapper,et al.  8th World Congress of Chemical Engineering , 2009 .

[14]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Threshold values for domino effects caused by blast wave interaction with process equipment , 2004 .

[15]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Historical analysis of accidents in seaports , 2004 .

[16]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  An external domino effects investment approach to improve cross-plant safety within chemical clusters. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Predicting the frequency of accidents in port areas by developing event trees from historical analysis , 2003 .