Mobile practices in everyday life: Popular digital technologies and schooling revisited

Mobile phones have rapidly been absorbed into the fabric of our day-to-day lives. They are now a key consumer item, a symbol of social capital and they connect their users to a mobile web with multiple applications. As ownership and access to smartphones has spread into the teenage years, their place in institutions of formal education has been marked by contention. The dominant view that mobiles have no place in the classroom has recently been contested by educators, such as Parry, who suggest that mobile learning, and the literacies involved, should play an important role in education. This paper argues for a more nuanced view of mobile technology, one that focuses on everyday social practices as a way of understanding the relationship between mobiles and learning. Using practice theory as a starting point, I suggest a way of mapping everyday mobile practices on to educational activity to illustrate potential areas for innovation and evaluation. I conclude by returning to the debate about mobiles in education, noting that familiar arguments about popular digital technology and schooling are once again being rehearsed. If ways of accessing, sharing and building knowledge are changing then a more principled consideration of how educational institutions relate to these changes is needed. Practitioner Notes What is already known about this topic There is growing interest in the use of mobiles in educational settings., Practitioners are beginning to look at the advantages and disadvantages of mobile learning., Increased ownership of smartphones and other mobile devices amongst the youth population is well documented., What this paper adds Social practice theory offers a useful perspective for looking at the use of mobiles in different contexts., Comparisons and contrasts between the uses of mobile technology in everyday life and in school settings can help in evaluating its potential., A consideration of ownership and access, and how this may reproduce social inequalities, are important to innovations in technology and education., Implications for practice and/or policy There is a need to move beyond debates about prohibiting or encouraging the use of mobiles to look at more specific examples of their advantages (and disadvantages)., Policy and implementation should be informed by a finer-grained analysis of mobile practices in everyday and educational settings., Mobile devices are highly desirable consumer items. Schools and other educational establishments have a responsibility to adopt a critical approach to ownership and use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Supporting cognitive models as users , 2000, TCHI.

[2]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Education in Liquid Modernity , 2005 .

[3]  Mimi Sheller,et al.  Mobile Publics: Beyond the Network Perspective , 2004 .

[4]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism , 2001, Digital Cities.

[5]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Understanding mobile contexts , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[6]  Andreas Reckwitz Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[7]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age , 2009 .

[8]  Richard Ling,et al.  Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway , 2002 .

[9]  Marcelo Milrad,et al.  Innovation in Mobile Learning: A European Perspective , 2009, Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn..

[10]  Terhi-Anna Wilska,et al.  Mobile Phone Use as Part of Young People's Consumption Styles , 2003 .

[11]  Anne Haas Dyson,et al.  Staying in the (Curricular) Lines , 2008 .

[12]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[13]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Towards a Theory of Mobile Learning , 2005 .

[14]  David Kirk,et al.  Savannah: experiential learning through mobile gaming , 2004 .

[15]  Giasemi N. Vavoula,et al.  Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning , 2004 .

[16]  T. Schatzki Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[17]  Keri Facer,et al.  Beyond the Myth of the 'Cyberkid': Young People at the Margins of the Information Revolution , 2001 .

[18]  M. Prensky Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[19]  C. Dowdall,et al.  Impressions, improvisations and compositions: reframing children's text production in social network sites , 2009 .

[20]  Guy Merchant Writing the future in the digital age , 2007 .

[21]  Guy Merchant Literacy in virtual worlds , 2009 .

[22]  Charles Crook,et al.  The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting , 2012 .

[23]  L. Caronia Feature Report: Mobile Culture: An Ethnography of Cellular Phone Uses in Teenagers’ Everyday Life , 2005 .

[24]  David S. Kirk,et al.  Savannah: mobile gaming and learning? , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  Guy Merchant Unravelling the social network: theory and research , 2012 .