Technical note: Intercomparison of three AATSR Level 2 (L2) AOD products overChina

Abstract. One of four main focus areas of the PEEX initiative is to establish and sustain long-term, continuous, and comprehensive ground-based, airborne, and seaborne observation infrastructure together with satellite data. The Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) aboard ENVISAT is used to observe the Earth in dual view. The AATSR data can be used to retrieve aerosol optical depth (AOD) over both land and ocean, which is an important parameter in the characterization of aerosol properties. In recent years, aerosol retrieval algorithms have been developed both over land and ocean, taking advantage of the features of dual view, which can help eliminate the contribution of Earth's surface to top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance. The Aerosol_cci project, as a part of the Climate Change Initiative (CCI), provides users with three AOD retrieval algorithms for AATSR data, including the Swansea algorithm (SU), the ATSR-2ATSR dual-view aerosol retrieval algorithm (ADV), and the Oxford-RAL Retrieval of Aerosol and Cloud algorithm (ORAC). The validation team of the Aerosol-CCI project has validated AOD (both Level 2 and Level 3 products) and AE (Angstrom Exponent) (Level 2 product only) against the AERONET data in a round-robin evaluation using the validation tool of the AeroCOM (Aerosol Comparison between Observations and Models) project. For the purpose of evaluating different performances of these three algorithms in calculating AODs over mainland China, we introduce ground-based data from CARSNET (China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network), which was designed for aerosol observations in China. Because China is vast in territory and has great differences in terms of land surfaces, the combination of the AERONET and CARSNET data can validate the L2 AOD products more comprehensively. The validation results show different performances of these products in 2007, 2008, and 2010. The SU algorithm performs very well over sites with different surface conditions in mainland China from March to October, but it slightly underestimates AOD over barren or sparsely vegetated surfaces in western China, with mean bias error (MBE) ranging from 0.05 to 0.10. The ADV product has the same precision with a low root mean square error (RMSE) smaller than 0.2 over most sites and the same error distribution as the SU product. The main limits of the ADV algorithm are underestimation and applicability; underestimation is particularly obvious over the sites of Datong, Lanzhou, and Urumchi, where the dominant land cover is grassland, with an MBE larger than 0.2, and the main aerosol sources are coal combustion and dust. The ORAC algorithm has the ability to retrieve AOD at different ranges, including high AOD (larger than 1.0); however, the stability deceases significantly with increasing AOD, especially when AOD > 1.0. In addition, the ORAC product is consistent with the CARSNET product in winter (December, January, and February), whereas other validation results lack matches during winter.

[1]  M. Griggs,et al.  Satellite Observations of Atmospheric Aerosols During the E0MET Cruise , 1979 .

[2]  C. Timmreck,et al.  Monthly Averages of Aerosol Properties: A Global Comparison Among Models, Satellite Data, and AERONET Ground Data , 2003 .

[3]  Hui Xu,et al.  The inter-comparison of AATSR aerosol optical depth retrievals from various algorithms , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[4]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Aerosol retrieval experiments in the ESA Aerosol_cci project , 2013 .

[5]  A. Misra,et al.  Validation of MODIS derived aerosol optical depth over Western India , 2008 .

[6]  David J. Diner,et al.  Aerosol source plume physical characteristics from space-based multiangle imaging , 2007 .

[7]  Meinrat O. Andreae,et al.  Aerosol cloud precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols , 2008 .

[8]  T. Eck,et al.  Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land , 2010 .

[9]  Michael J. Garay,et al.  Response to "Toward unified satellite climatology of aerosol properties. 3. MODIS versus MISR versus AERONET" , 2011 .

[10]  Gerrit de Leeuw,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol optical depth over land using two‐angle view satellite radiometry during TARFOX , 1998 .

[11]  E. Vermote,et al.  The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation , 2005 .

[12]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  A regional scale chemical transport modeling of Asian aerosols with data assimilation of AOD observations using optimal interpolation technique , 2008 .

[13]  Tuomas Laurila,et al.  On measurements of aerosol particles and greenhouse gases in Siberia and future research needs , 2011 .

[14]  Kathleen A. Crean,et al.  Multiangle imaging spectroradiometer (MISR) global aerosol optical depth validation based on 2 years of coincident Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations : Global aerosol system , 2005 .

[15]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[16]  A. Kokhanovsky,et al.  Satellite Aerosol Remote Sensing Over Land , 2009 .

[17]  Sietse O. Los,et al.  A global dataset of atmospheric aerosol optical depth and surface reflectance from AATSR , 2012 .

[18]  P. Goloub,et al.  Instrument calibration and aerosol optical depth validation of the China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network , 2009 .

[19]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[20]  Paul Ginoux,et al.  A Long-Term Record of Aerosol Optical Depth from TOMS Observations and Comparison to AERONET Measurements , 2002 .

[21]  Muhammad Bilal,et al.  Validation and accuracy assessment of a Simplified Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm (SARA) over Beijing under low and high aerosol loadings and dust storms , 2014 .

[22]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Retrieval of land surface bidirectional reflectance and aerosol opacity from ATSR-2 multiangle imagery , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Richard Siddans,et al.  Oxford-RAL Aerosol and Cloud (ORAC): aerosol retrievals from satellite radiometers , 2009 .

[24]  Lulu Zhang,et al.  Haze in China: current and future challenges. , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[25]  Costas A. Varotsos,et al.  An observational study of the atmospheric ultra-fine particle dynamics , 2012 .

[26]  B. Holben,et al.  Validation of MODIS aerosol optical depth retrieval over land , 2002 .

[27]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Aerosol optical depth and land surface reflectance from multiangle AATSR measurements: global validation and intersensor comparisons , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Evaluation of seven European aerosol optical depth retrieval algorithms for climate analysis , 2015 .

[29]  M. Higashi,et al.  Change of iron species and iron solubility in Asian dust during the long-range transport from western China to Japan , 2011 .

[30]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[31]  Kai Zhang,et al.  MAC‐v1: A new global aerosol climatology for climate studies , 2013 .

[32]  H. Kraemer,et al.  2 x 2 kappa coefficients: measures of agreement or association. , 1989, Biometrics.

[33]  Costas A. Varotsos,et al.  Tropospheric aerosol forcing of climate: a case study for the greater area of Greece , 2008 .

[34]  B. Holben,et al.  A spatio‐temporal approach for global validation and analysis of MODIS aerosol products , 2002 .

[35]  Gerrit de Leeuw,et al.  The ADV/ASV AATSR aerosol retrieval algorithm: current status and presentation of a full-mission AOD dataset , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[36]  E. Vermote,et al.  Operational remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer , 1997 .

[37]  Yong Xue,et al.  Observation of an agricultural biomass burning in central and east China using merged aerosol optical depth data from multiple satellite missions , 2014 .

[38]  E. Prins,et al.  An overview of GOES‐8 diurnal fire and smoke results for SCAR‐B and 1995 fire season in South America , 1998 .

[39]  David J. Diner,et al.  Comparison of MISR and AERONET aerosol optical depths over desert sites , 2003 .

[40]  T. Eck,et al.  Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols , 1999 .

[41]  Huadong Guo,et al.  Introduction: The Pan-Eurasian Experiment (PEEX) - multidisciplinary, multiscale and multicomponent research and capacity-building initiative , 2015 .

[42]  Yong Xue,et al.  Validation and analysis of aerosol optical thickness retrieval over land , 2012 .

[43]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements , 2000 .

[44]  J. Hovenier,et al.  The adding method for multiple scattering calculations of polarized light , 1987 .

[45]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy , 1997 .

[46]  Lorraine Remer,et al.  MISR Aerosol Product Attributes and Statistical Comparisons With MODIS , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[47]  F. Dominici,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  C. Varotsos Airborne measurements of aerosol, ozone, and solar ultraviolet irradiance in the troposphere , 2005 .

[49]  L. Remer,et al.  The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean , 2013 .

[50]  Robert C. Levy,et al.  MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua's e‐Deep Blue, Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations , 2014 .

[51]  Oleg Dubovik,et al.  Global aerosol optical properties and application to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer aerosol retrieval over land , 2007 .

[52]  G. H. Rosenfield,et al.  A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. , 1986 .

[53]  R. J. Flowerdew,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol optical thickness over land using the ATSR‐2 Dual‐Look Satellite Radiometer , 1996 .