Effect of occlusal contact size on interfacial stresses and failure of a bonded ceramic: FEA and monotonic loading analyses.

OBJECTIVE This study investigated whether contact area (i.e. facet size) would influence the loads necessary for subsurface radial crack formation in porcelain specimens bonded to a dentin analog material. METHODS Dental porcelain discs (0.5 mm, 1 mm, and 1.5 mm thick) were bonded to compliant bases simulating dentin, and loaded with either a 1 mm, 2 mm, or 3 mm diameter aluminum piston until fracture. Pop-in of the subsurface radial crack from the bonded interface was detected using the acoustic emission (AE) method. Pre-test and post-test finite element analysis (FEA) was used to model the experiment and to calculate subsurface failure stresses. RESULTS There were significant differences in loads sustained before fracture according to both the ceramic thickness and the piston diameter (p<0.05; ANOVA and post-hoc Scheffe). Failure loads were found to be proportional to the square of the porcelain thickness. For all thicknesses, significantly higher loads were sustained beneath the 3mm piston than beneath the 1mm piston. FEA calculated failure strengths for the 1 mm thick porcelain (calculated from experimental mean loads) differed significantly for loading with the 1mm piston (168 MPa) or 3 mm piston (60 MPa). CONCLUSIONS It appears that both ceramic thickness and contact facet size may be clinically controlled to increase load-bearing ability of all-ceramic crowns. Single value strengths may not accurately model bonded dental ceramics; adjustments such as with Weibull scaling may improve accuracy. These results further suggest that small spherical indenters do not create clinically analogous contact conditions.

[1]  K. Johnson Contact Mechanics: Non-Hertzian normal contact of elastic bodies , 1985 .

[2]  C. Hsueh,et al.  Modeling of effects of adhesive interlayers on contact-induced radial cracking in brittle coatings on substrates , 2003 .

[3]  H Fischer,et al.  Nondestructive estimation of the strength of dental ceramic materials. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  E. D. Rekow,et al.  Materials Design of Ceramic-based Layer Structures for Crowns , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[5]  B. Lawn Fracture of Brittle Solids by Brian Lawn , 1993 .

[6]  A. Woda,et al.  Occlusal contacts and tooth wear. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  W. Gillette,et al.  Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfractionlike cervical lesions in a population of U.S. veterans. , 2001, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[8]  R. Giordano,et al.  Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics: clinically failed restorations. , 1990, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[9]  P. Petsche,et al.  Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[10]  O Hidaka,et al.  Influence of Clenching Intensity on Bite Force Balance, Occlusal Contact Area, and Average Bite Pressure , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[11]  P. Miranda,et al.  Modeling of contact-induced radial cracking in ceramic bilayer coatings on compliant substrates , 2003 .

[12]  B. Lawn,et al.  Contact-induced damage in ceramic coatings on compliant substrates : Fracture mechanics and design , 2001 .

[13]  B. Lawn,et al.  Characterization of damage modes in dental ceramic bilayer structures. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  S. Campbell,et al.  Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  Mariano A Polack,et al.  Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[16]  K J Anusavice,et al.  Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  R R Seghi,et al.  Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. , 1995, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[18]  K. Anusavice,et al.  Fracture Surface Characterization of Clinically Failed All-ceramic Crowns , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[19]  J. Quinn,et al.  Failure analysis of ceramic clinical cases using qualitative fractography. , 2006, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  M V Swain,et al.  Determination of elastic properties of metal alloys and dental porcelains. , 2001, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[21]  R. DeLong,et al.  Digital imaging of occlusal contacts in the intercuspal position. , 1994, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[22]  J. Quinn,et al.  Fractographic analyses of three ceramic whole crown restoration failures. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  Vince Adams,et al.  Building Better Products with Finite Element Analysis , 1998 .

[24]  B. Lawn,et al.  Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of all-ceramic crownlike layer structures: a review. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  Scherrer Ss,et al.  The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. , 1993 .

[26]  K A Malament,et al.  Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  J R Kelly,et al.  Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[28]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[29]  W. Soboyejo,et al.  Contact damage in model dental multilayers: An investigation of the influence of indenter size , 2003, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[30]  R. Morrell,et al.  Design with non-ductile materials , 1982 .

[31]  David S. Chilton,et al.  Plates on Elastic Foundation , 1990 .